apple0154
MEOW
Maybe, however, their "eugenics corporate medicine voodoo" results in a longer life span. Check the data.
Where's the moral outrage?
- Thread starter Canceled2
- Start date
Maybe, however, their "eugenics corporate medicine voodoo" results in a longer life span. Check the data.
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
Civilian? No, not from my perspective. He is an enemy of the state, he published our classified defense documents, in the days of Ben Franklin, that would certainly get you the firing squad. He committed an act of war against the United States, and he is a prime target of our military, as far as I'm concerned. His ass would be in a morgue somewhere in about 36 hrs., if not sooner. This is how such an incident should be handled.
Your argument is weak, he is not the one who stole the documents, he only published them!
http://charonqc.wordpress.com/2010/...ange-of-wikileaks-actually-committed-a-crime/
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-...rip-of-u-s-law-commentary-by-ann-woolner.html
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
Oh, the guy who stole them should be pushing up daisies already, why is his ass still alive?
I took out your links sweetie, I don't use them. I understand Assage only published the documents, but the act of publishing them, is a direct attack on the US military and our national security, and should be dealt with swiftly and harshly, and in no uncertain terms. Sorry if that hurts your liberal heart.
No, I, like most thinking progressives, follow the rule of law and not the mob mentality!
You go ahead and be the mob, Doxie! Fetch!
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
It's not mob mentality, it's rules of war. Mr. Assage should understand that, it's business, it's what is done when you perpetrate an act of aggression on the US. And yes, it was fully intended to do harm to the military, so it was an act of aggression. You, like most progressives, have your head up your ass when it comes to securing and defending the nation.
/MSG/
Uwaa OmO
Dixie, we need more people like you in office. So many things would be done faster in America if we only got rid of those little restrictions on government prosecution. Damned 'laws'. If I suspect someone of something, that's good enough to kill them in my book.
He doesn't use my links, no wonder he doesn't get any smarter!
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
We don't "suspect" Assagne is doing this, he has admitted it. And those "damned laws" don't apply to acts of war, against enemies of the state, different category, different rules apply.
Sorry, but supporting left-wing blogs and propaganda outlets, is not going to ever make you smarter.
They have made me smarter than thou! You promote lawlessness and chaos! The world under your rule would be a disaster!
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
The fungus under my big toenail is smarter than you, sweetie. No, I don't support (or condone) lawlessness or chaos. I do support the US having a big enough set of balls to go after someone like Assage, I hate to think Liberals have so PC-ified the military, that an internet geek can take us down, but that looks to be the case. This is embarrassing, aren't you embarrassed?
Yes, I am embarrassed by people like you who live in America and talk this way.
I support that rule of law, that makes me toe jam smarter than you!
Yes. He expanded the PATRIOT act to make unwarranted listening to calls even stronger, and continued rendition only using outside agencies that were not even under our control. Taking people to Egypt to be "questioned" by people who aren't even US agents.
Yeah, those two especially.
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
I support the rule of law too, you ignorant hick. WAR has nothing to do with the rule of law! This guy isn't even subject to US laws, he's not a citizen of the US! He committed an act of war against the US, and should be treated as an enemy target, not a citizen suspected of a crime. I don't really give a damn if you don't like the way I talk, this guy should have been eradicated months ago. If Richard Nix--hell--BILL CLINTON, were president, this guy would have just mysteriously vanished one day... *poof* gone! It's not about "rule of law" it's about taking care of business. TCB!
Citations?
On the first, my recollection is that Congress passed a law that legalized the unlawful surveillance that the Bush Administration was performing. If Obama is simply utilizing the authority granted to him (by him, in part, since he voted in favor of the bill) then his administration hasn't expanded anything. Congress did. It sucks and it's stupid, but it isn't an expansion of anything by the Obama Administration.
On the second, I don't know what you're talking about so a link would be helpful.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
LMAO.... you are such a hack...
your mantra is 'if you got some, I am taking it'
which is worse?
Obama's Admin filed it themselves.
http://www.alternet.org/rights/1356...h's_legal_defense_of_warrantless_wiretapping/
In a stunning defense of President George W. Bush's warrantless wiretapping program, President Barack Obama has broadened the government's legal argument for immunizing his Administration and government agencies from lawsuits surrounding the National Security Agency's eavesdropping efforts.
In fact, a close read of a government filing last Friday reveals that the Obama Administration has gone beyond any previous legal claims put forth by former President Bush.
More at link...
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/25/us/politics/25rendition.html
Now, he "promises" to monitor it closely, but previously he "promised" to end the practice. Neither are reality. They hire outside entities to perform the rendition and questioning.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
(1) Expanding the legal justification for a practice is not an expansion of the underlying practice.
(2) He never promised to end renditions.
(3) Where's the source for the claim that Obama somehow expanded rendition?