Why We Need Gun Restrictions

[sear]

"Police chiefs don't make laws, they enforce them." R #457

You quote me extensively, and then post prattle like this. It insinuates that your comment is responsive to anything I've written.

It isn't.

I never asserted police chiefs make laws.

Please don't troll me.

"Jordan v New London makes my point." R #457

A concisely quoted portion of it might. But you have provided none. It's not my job to make your point for you. If you have a point to make, get on with it.

 

[Lightbringer]

Ahhhh, love it when the fucking idiots poke their heads out of their ass to once again demonstrate their ignorance. You, being the ignorant ass you are, stated that Congress had modified/eliminated the Militia by US code. Now, what part of US 18 are you referring to?

You got your ass handed to you and now everyone else is a fucking idiot. And on top of that you're asking for a part of the US Code you should have known before you even began the militia conversation. You're ignorant and you started a conversation you didn't belong in.

As I said before, if you want to repeal the Second just admit it up front.

 

[Old Trapper]

You are kind of slow for this, no?

Have you stolen a "modern military rifle" yet since that is your responsibility, and you certainly cannot buy one?

 

[Lightbringer]

Have you stolen a "modern military rifle" yet since that is your responsibility, and you certainly cannot buy one?

Ha ha ha..that's what you resorted to? I'm pretty sure Rune can afford a rifle. I have one too by the way.

 

[Old Trapper]

You got your ass handed to you and now everyone else is a fucking idiot. And on top of that you're asking for a part of the US Code you should have known before you even began the militia conversation. You're ignorant and you started a conversation you didn't belong in.

As I said before, if you want to repeal the Second just admit it up front.

Ahhh, and once again the fucking idiot tries to defend his ignorance. And I tire of it, so I will once again educate the fool.

The Code you need is not USC 18, it is USC 10 passed in 1956. Now, if you can read with your midget brain, you will find that the Congress of the time separated the idea of an "organized" Militia, and an "unorganized" Militia into two different ideas. The first was the National Guard (Organized Militia), and all others into the "Unorganized Militia". Organization, training, etc., was still required for the "unorganized militia". The difference being that one was permanently stationed, the other was not.

Get the idea you fucking idiot? Now you can do your usual thing, and twist it to meet your low IQ standards.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/246

"the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia."

 

[Old Trapper]

Ha ha ha..that's what you resorted to? I'm pretty sure Rune can afford a rifle. I have one too by the way.

Hey idiot class fool, can you read? Do you have a clue as to what a "modern military rifle" is? If yu find one at a gun show you can bet your ass it was stolen.

Ignorant fucking fool.

 

[Lightbringer]

Hey idiot class fool, can you read? Do you have a clue as to what a "modern military rifle" is? If yu find one at a gun show you can bet your ass it was stolen.

Ignorant fucking fool.

Oh, is old fart mad? Your militia play didn't work. Fuck off, gather yourself, and go for the Second like we all know you want to.

 

[Rune]

That is PRECISELY why it's circular!

In shorthand: the banking cliche' is:
Those that need the bank loan don't qualify, and
those that qualify don't need the bank loan.

The confederacy had printing presses too. But their paper wasn't as good a Lincoln's.
Lincoln (aka "the North") had more infrastructure, and thus more of what attends it.

The U.S. War of Northern Aggression killed more Americans (Union & Reb) than any other U.S. War.

Those living today may in our nation of over 300M, reflect with grief over the 58K we lost in Vietnam, or the few hundred we lost in the elder Bush's Gulf War, or perhaps the 4.5K we lost in the younger Bush's Iraq War.
Imagine how out of our 19th century population, our loss of well over half a million Americans affected our War-torn country.

First of all you can fuck right off with your Northern Aggression BULLSHIT.

Second, there is nothing circular about the truth.

 

[Old Trapper]

Oh, is old fart mad? Your militia play didn't work. Fuck off, gather yourself, and go for the Second like we all know you want to.

And the fucking idiot goes

 

[RB 60]

I cannot overstate how much I disagree with you on this.

I didn't say all. My cousin became a cop in Phila. right out of the military, did well and is retired. We hunted together for years, good guy.
Don't you know a vet or two who would make a good cop?

 

[sear]

"First of all you can $#@! right off with your Northern Aggression BULL$#@!." R #468

You flatter me madam. And yes indeed, if you have a great granddaughter of marriageable age, with all the necessary refinements, I may seriously consider her invitation to me for dinner. My thanks in advance for your generous offer.

"Second, there is nothing circular about the truth." R

- that's nice -

Thank you for agreeing with me, and corroborating my observation. We are in accord (but not a Honda).

 

[sear]

R6 #470

That's fine. But you may be implying a fallacy.
It is not necessarily the military training and experience that suits one otherwise not predisposed to police work. It may more likely be that military and civilian police work attract the same personality profile.

 

[Rune]

You quote me extensively, and then post prattle like this. It insinuates that your comment is responsive to anything I've written.

It isn't.

I never asserted police chiefs make laws.

Please don't troll me.

A concisely quoted portion of it might. But you have provided none. It's not my job to make your point for you. If you have a point to make, get on with it.

It was perfectly relevant, stop nitpicking.
If you can't be bothered to read about the case, I don't give a single fuck.

 

[Rune]

Have you stolen a "modern military rifle" yet since that is your responsibility, and you certainly cannot buy one?

I have my version of it, Yes and it could kill you from a pretty good distance and it cost $70 used with a good scope years ago.

Why would I not be able to afford a rifle you presumptuous prick?

 

[sear]

R #473

I never asserted it wasn't "relevant". I observed that veteran suitability for LEO career may be less a matter of the veteran's experience, but of the veteran's preference. U.S. President Richard Milhous Nixon ended U.S. military conscription generations ago. So our vets are all volunteers now. So any vet at issue here wouldn't be a vet unless s/he wanted to be.

That's not "nitpicking". It's correction. If you do not wish to be corrected, do not quote me, and then pretend to respond to the concept/s I post with your vulgar prattle.

 

[Rune]

Hey idiot class fool, can you read? Do you have a clue as to what a "modern military rifle" is? If yu find one at a gun show you can bet your ass it was stolen.

Ignorant fucking fool.

You really are a retard.
Modern military issue weapons at this time include the Model 1911 Colt ACP.
Even the vaunted M-16 is from the '50s and an M1 Garrand would certainly be considered a modern weapon.

You should really shut the fuck up, about now.

 

[Old Trapper]

I have my version of it, Yes and it could kill you from a pretty good distance and it cost $70 used with a good scope years ago.

Why would I not be able to afford a rifle you presumptuous prick?

Well, yet another ignorant dickhead speaks out of his ass. A "modern military rifle" cannot be bought legally in this country. It is full auto with mags you cannot buy. Often times it has a sniper scope with night vision, and if you bought it "years ago" it sure as hell is not "modern". Never said you could not afford a rifle, even a cheap one. And it is not a "version" of a modern military rifle. Hell, I have a Mauser from WW1. Is that a "version" of a "modern military rifle"?

But thanks for once again proving what an ignorant prick you are.

Modern Military Rifles:

M4/M4A1 Carbine. ...
M249 Squad Automatic Weapon (SAW) ...
M24 Sniper Weapon System. ...
M240L 7.62 Medium Machine Gun. ...
M107 Semi-Automatic Long Range Sniper Rifle (LRSR) ...
M2A1 .50 Caliber Machine Gun. ...
M240B/L/H 7.62mm Medium Machine Gun. ...
M110 7.62mm Semi-Automatic Sniper System

 

[Fentoine Lum]

I didn't say all. My cousin became a cop in Phila. right out of the military, did well and is retired. We hunted together for years, good guy.
Don't you know a vet or two who would make a good cop?

Don't know, would they murder unarmed citizens and then say they were afraid? Shouldn't be cops.

 

[Old Trapper]

You really are a retard.
Modern military issue weapons at this time include the Model 1911 Colt ACP.
Even the vaunted M-16 is from the '50s and an M1 Garrand would certainly be considered a modern weapon.

You should really shut the fuck up, about now.

Which one do you own nut licker? BTW, isn't the Colt a pistol?

Fucking low IQ idiots, and their allowed to vote.

 

[RB 60]

Which one do you own nut licker? BTW, isn't the Colt a pistol?

Fucking low IQ idiots, and their allowed to vote.

Bravo! Yes, the 1911 is a handgun. The M1 Garand and M1-A are rifles. I'll sell you one, or all if you have the money (if you can pass the background check and have an inkling of how to load and fire one).
If I sell you one of my Garands, when loading the magazine, make sure to keep your thumb on top of the cartridges to secure them when the bolt slams shut

Oh, and yes, I'm allowed to vote (by the way, it's they're)