You dummy most of those are bots.go to the top of the page and click on Quick Links....then scroll down to "who's online" and click....it'll give you a list of people who are on-line and scrolling through the threads. At any time there are numerous guests and various users viewing the posts. There's no law that says they have to comment either way...but they are there, reading.
Got it now, Freedumb?
Told you, time for the silly links back to posts that have already been refuted.
http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=673015&postcount=292
Bottom line: Damo is just another neocon parrot with delusions of intellectual superiorty to those who spew the EXACT same BS as he does. Pathetic, yet slightly amusing.
Told you, time for the silly links back to posts that have already been refuted.
Thanks, TaiChi, you make it easy! (Time for the victory lap).
See folks....all this Damo does is just keep repeating self aggrandizing tripe that has NO basis in reality. Damo time and again keeps trying to substitute his opinion, supposition and conjecture for FACTS and logic. He fails every time, but Damo figures if he denys all and claims otherwise, no one will notice.
I suspect you will again post links to posts that don't make your point and have been addressed several times. Then you'll start getting all excited and cursing while talking about "the chronology of the posts". (hint: It is hard to "refute" the very real chart from the actual government entity you seek to defend, in fact, you haven't done it because they are simple facts.)
Again folks, Damo makes reference to a chart that he offered as proof of his assertions. Pity the damned fool just INGNORES THE FACT that I used the very same chart to demonstrate Damo's "selective" reporting...and provided the information that basically refuted Damo's original assertion. In short, Damo's either a lame ass liar or truly delusional. But as always, the chronology of the posts will always be his undoing.
It is imminently plain to all of us that you have had your foot in your mouth for the past 100 posts in this thread, but rather than remove it you have tried desperately to fit the other foot in too.
And there you have it folks....Damo gets proven wrong and has a melt down. Bottom line: Damo is just another neocon parrot with delusions of intellectual superiorty to those who spew the EXACT same BS as he does. I'll let the little dope have the last word (a predictable collage of repeated disproven claims and personal attacks, as we've already seen Damo do).
You can't verify what you claim either Libby. But I have ran one of these boards with this same software- bots scour the boards all the time whether the board owner likes it or not. And this board has interactive advertisement, which means essentially that the board owner invites the ad bots in. They "read" what you write so they can determine the next ad for your next click.Every day? All of them? Because there are registered users that DON'T POST on many threads, but read them. I do, and so do others. Thing is, YOU just can't verify what you claim.
No matter how much you try, Southy...your picayune attempts to discredit anything I say just falls apart under simple logic. You such a pathetic person, Southy....you can't get past me in an honest debate on various topics, and your aim at throwing rocks in frustration is abysmal....but such is the plight of the Southern Man. Carry on.
Incredible irony here. The Jones Act is an entirely different issue than the 15ppm EPA standard. You're so ignorant of a simple technical issue that you're apparently can't understand what I wrote, and in the simplest language possible.
And your calling the 15ppm issue a "neocon talking point" is laughable if it wasn't so sad. What major politician or talking head has discussed this?
Do you even know what this issue is? Let me try to explain it to you again:
The skimmer ships take a mixture of oil and water off the surface of the ocean. Its a crude process, and this mixture is typically 30 to 70% oil. So for every gallon of oil that you pick up you might have one or two gallons of water to dispose of. The mixture then flows into the ship and into a settling tank. The oil floats to the surface of the tank and the water sinks, like a bottle of salad dressing. In reality this settling process is only 99% or so efficient at separating the oil and water. Common sense would dictate that you should them pump out this water and dump it behind the ship, because even if the water contained 1% oil, it was cleaner then before and is being dumped into a spill area, which itself is contaminated with oil, and the oil might get picked up in a second pass.
But The Obama's EPA insists that the water has to be cleaned to less than 15ppm before being dumped. That requires a land based treatment technology. So the ship has to steam all the way back to port with the mixture of oil and water, stirring up more polluted water, making it harder to skim off, through some booms, causing more oil to be released into adjacent waters. Then it has to pump the water into land based tanks for further treatment, steam back to the soil site, through more booms and then stir up more floating oil....
Its a totally retarded way to clean up an ocean, Libby. It is ineffective, wastes a tremendous amount of resources, and the end result is that very little gets cleaned up relative to what could be done should common sense prevail.
And again, the only person who can stop all this nonsense is your beloved black president, The Obama.
I never even attempted to combine the two issues Libby. Its not up to me to defend your baseless allegation.
But it is up to you to prove your claims, asshole. And you claimed I combined the two issues....PROVE IT! Put up or shut up!
Congrats on finally having some common sense on the 15ppm issue. Now all you have to do is realize that The Obama bears responsibility for ordering the EPA to stand down. What other person has that power? I don't think anyone, really, not even the head of the EPA.
Can't you read, you ignorant lout? Didn't I say in no uncertain terms that the bureaucracy needs a kick in the ass? Didn't I say previously that Obama should have pulled a Slick Willy and gotten everyone in a room and throw corporate and gov't protocol rules aside, demanding consensus solutions or rolling heads? Pay ATTENTION!
I used the term "the black president" because you did, Libby, several weeks ago. If I'm racist for doing so then so are you.
