"Who is in charge of the Trump swift boat project?"

Which is why Anatta officially reached moron status with this claim.
you've become quite disgusting with your inability to see how loathsome she is. She's entering the presidency as a plutocrat
I hope this was simply a misread on your part ( calling me a moron)
 
Read the OP for once: I realize you are a hapless partisan - but at least get the facts straight.
Those aren't my characterization -it's part of the higher ups in the Clinton Machine



and to"opposition research" above - yes that is obvious.
It's the sheer scope and size -recall this was even before Trump was the nominee..and they had sections of folders on him.
What chance did Bernie ever have? if you prefer to think of it that way.

The Clinton machine is the culmination of huge money driven donors in every conceivable manner funding this
POTUS campaign in never before seen "yugeness".

It's why ClintonWorld always say "take the money" - money is the 'life blood of politics', but such enormous
reliance on money to win enjoys corruption as a go along tag team.
I read the OP. No mention of the origin of your thread title.

After that, you post another 1000 word compilation from Fox News.

I really won't spend time on anything from Fox.
 
you've become quite disgusting with your inability to see how loathsome she is. She's entering the presidency as a plutocrat
I hope this was simply a misread on your part ( calling me a moron)

you smeared a war hero evil one
 
what this shows is the narrative was pre-written ( not that you ever thought Clinton had a spontaneous bone in her body)
and faithfully executed by the servile press.



I've never seen a more scripted campaign work so closely with the press to run the entire narrative..amazing
You think a POTUS that is 'spontaneous' is a good idea?
 
to be clear...you're criticizing the most prepared candidate since Obama, for being prepared?

Trump started out of the gate by denigrating women. That was easy pickins for any opposing candidate.

And...how DARE you refer to this as swift boating. That might be the most idiotic illustration of your blind hatred to date.

Holy shit, save your poutrage for someone who gives a fuck.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
you've become quite disgusting with your inability to see how loathsome she is. She's entering the presidency as a plutocrat
I hope this was simply a misread on your part ( calling me a moron)
I'm not voting for her. Odd that you didn't realize...as I did...in '12, that she was our next POTUS. When you refuse to play this game anymore, you see with amazing clarity.

Whereas your hatred has blinded you, and you sink farther and farther into an obsessive mess. You scour her emails like some peeping Tom who stands out in the rain with his cock in is hand.

Now...if you're saying that you don't believe Hillary's methods are the same as Bush's attack on Kerry, then I stand corrected. I apologize for the moron comment, as I sit and worry about just how low you will sink before we crown our new POTUS.
 
Read the OP for once: I realize you are a hapless partisan - but at least get the facts straight.
Those aren't my characterization -it's part of the higher ups in the Clinton Machine



and to"opposition research" above - yes that is obvious.
It's the sheer scope and size -recall this was even before Trump was the nominee..and they had sections of folders on him.
What chance did Bernie ever have? if you prefer to think of it that way.

The Clinton machine is the culmination of huge money driven donors in every conceivable manner funding this
POTUS campaign in never before seen "yugeness".

It's why ClintonWorld always say "take the money" - money is the 'life blood of politics', but such enormous
reliance on money to win enjoys corruption as a go along tag team.
I had a modicum of respect for Althea in the past but he is now just a partisan hack.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
what this shows is the narrative was pre-written ( not that you ever thought Clinton had a spontaneous bone in her body)
and faithfully executed by the servile press.

To criticize Trump for hin inability to take the bait is valid too - but the narrative unfolded just as plannd
thanks to the press acting to reinforce and cover the race as presented by the Clinton Machine.

I've never seen a more scripted campaign work so closely with the press to run the entire narrative..amazing
Can you remember to ban Daesh in future, she is just a complete moron.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
I had a modicum of respect for Althea in the past but he is now just a partisan hack.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Hah! I'm not voting for Hillary. And you aren't voting for Trump. So why does your opinion carry more weight?
 
I read the OP. No mention of the origin of your thread title.

After that, you post another 1000 word compilation from Fox News.

I really won't spend time on anything from Fox.
then don't give me shit about what you won't read.
It's in the OP I bolded it, and quoted it and put quotes in the thread title.
 
Hah! I'm not voting for Hillary. And you aren't voting for Trump. So why does your opinion carry more weight?
Therefore I can be more dispassionate, Trump is bad enough but Clinton is truly effing awful. She will start a new full blown Cold War, unleash the PC gauleiters, spent a fuckton of money on chasing the climate change chimera, ensure that the UK is at the back of the queue for a trade deal and allow the crooked bastards that run Wall Street and inhabit the corridors of Capitol Hill to carry on business as usual. Trump wants to drain the swamp, Clinton just wants to fill it up with even more effluent.

Don't you have any decent women politicians like our Theresa May?

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
You think a POTUS that is 'spontaneous' is a good idea?
some imagination instead of plodding right down Cold War 2.0 is called for yes. I do not want a computer for POTUS, I want a nimble mind.
Clinton is dogmatic in both foreign and domestic politics
 
The Clinton campaign’s recent attacks on Donald Trump for his comments about a beauty queen’s weight problems were months in the making, according to an opposition research report uncovered in emails released by WikiLeaks on Sunday.

Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton invoked those comments during the first presidential debate on Sept. 26. Near the end of the showdown, during a sustained riff about the Republican nominee's past remarks about women, Clinton cited the case of Miss Universe 1996 Alicia Machado.

“And one of the worst things he said was about a woman in a beauty contest,” Clinton said. “He loves beauty contests, supporting them and hanging around them. And he called this woman ‘Miss Piggy.’ Then he called her ‘Miss Housekeeping,’ because she was Latina. Donald, she has a name.”

Trump responded: “Where did you find this?”

The answer is: in a 157-page opposition research file that Clinton’s campaign had been using since at least Dec. 19, 2015, the day research director Tony Carrk emailed it – and research files on Sens. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio – to Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta. Podesta’s emails were subsequently hacked and more than

The big difference is that the Swift Boat shit was untrue, this "Mrs. Piggy" stuff is true!
 
I'm not voting for her. Odd that you didn't realize...as I did...in '12, that she was our next POTUS. When you refuse to play this game anymore, you see with amazing clarity.

Whereas your hatred has blinded you, and you sink farther and farther into an obsessive mess. You scour her emails like some peeping Tom who stands out in the rain with his cock in is hand.

Now...if you're saying that you don't believe Hillary's methods are the same as Bush's attack on Kerry, then I stand corrected. I apologize for the moron comment, as I sit and worry about just how low you will sink before we crown our new POTUS.
of course i "realized"she was her next POTUS - am I supposed to just get in line for a lying warmonger?..

So you apologize for the moron comment
( accepted -it's water under the bridge and I am used to butting heads with you -it doesn't mean we aren't friends)

and then this about the Emails?? :rolleyes:

I don't know if you were on DCJ 2. But i've been covering the Emails scandal since it broke in the NYTimes.
Every damn Dem told me for months I was "obsessed"as the story unfolded.

Most people can't put it together -but start from the premise EVERYTHING she said at the United nations speech ( March 2015)
and going forward has been a lie
or at minimum a deflection.

This isn't some small potato like an Access Hollywood" remark on an open mic -it's who she is.
Her character is to deceive and aggregate money,, and now power, regardless of where it takes her -
and it takes her to some really disgusting,dark places.

It's why she is so slimey close to the Wall st crowd where she said the are best able to regulate themselves.

* eewe ..ick..grotesque* -she's an enemy of accountability and transparency as well as a corporate stooge/
 
Back
Top