you've become quite disgusting with your inability to see how loathsome she is. She's entering the presidency as a plutocratWhich is why Anatta officially reached moron status with this claim.
I read the OP. No mention of the origin of your thread title.Read the OP for once: I realize you are a hapless partisan - but at least get the facts straight.
Those aren't my characterization -it's part of the higher ups in the Clinton Machine
and to"opposition research" above - yes that is obvious.
It's the sheer scope and size -recall this was even before Trump was the nominee..and they had sections of folders on him.
What chance did Bernie ever have? if you prefer to think of it that way.
The Clinton machine is the culmination of huge money driven donors in every conceivable manner funding this
POTUS campaign in never before seen "yugeness".
It's why ClintonWorld always say "take the money" - money is the 'life blood of politics', but such enormous
reliance on money to win enjoys corruption as a go along tag team.
you've become quite disgusting with your inability to see how loathsome she is. She's entering the presidency as a plutocrat
I hope this was simply a misread on your part ( calling me a moron)
You think a POTUS that is 'spontaneous' is a good idea?what this shows is the narrative was pre-written ( not that you ever thought Clinton had a spontaneous bone in her body)
and faithfully executed by the servile press.
I've never seen a more scripted campaign work so closely with the press to run the entire narrative..amazing
to be clear...you're criticizing the most prepared candidate since Obama, for being prepared?
Trump started out of the gate by denigrating women. That was easy pickins for any opposing candidate.
And...how DARE you refer to this as swift boating. That might be the most idiotic illustration of your blind hatred to date.
Fuckwit!!Which is why Anatta officially reached moron status with this claim.
I'm not voting for her. Odd that you didn't realize...as I did...in '12, that she was our next POTUS. When you refuse to play this game anymore, you see with amazing clarity.you've become quite disgusting with your inability to see how loathsome she is. She's entering the presidency as a plutocrat
I hope this was simply a misread on your part ( calling me a moron)
I had a modicum of respect for Althea in the past but he is now just a partisan hack.Read the OP for once: I realize you are a hapless partisan - but at least get the facts straight.
Those aren't my characterization -it's part of the higher ups in the Clinton Machine
and to"opposition research" above - yes that is obvious.
It's the sheer scope and size -recall this was even before Trump was the nominee..and they had sections of folders on him.
What chance did Bernie ever have? if you prefer to think of it that way.
The Clinton machine is the culmination of huge money driven donors in every conceivable manner funding this
POTUS campaign in never before seen "yugeness".
It's why ClintonWorld always say "take the money" - money is the 'life blood of politics', but such enormous
reliance on money to win enjoys corruption as a go along tag team.
Can you remember to ban Daesh in future, she is just a complete moron.what this shows is the narrative was pre-written ( not that you ever thought Clinton had a spontaneous bone in her body)
and faithfully executed by the servile press.
To criticize Trump for hin inability to take the bait is valid too - but the narrative unfolded just as plannd
thanks to the press acting to reinforce and cover the race as presented by the Clinton Machine.
I've never seen a more scripted campaign work so closely with the press to run the entire narrative..amazing
You're here...aren't you?Holy shit, save your outrage for someone who gives a fuck.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
Hah! I'm not voting for Hillary. And you aren't voting for Trump. So why does your opinion carry more weight?I had a modicum of respect for Althea in the past but he is now just a partisan hack.
Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
then don't give me shit about what you won't read.I read the OP. No mention of the origin of your thread title.
After that, you post another 1000 word compilation from Fox News.
I really won't spend time on anything from Fox.
Therefore I can be more dispassionate, Trump is bad enough but Clinton is truly effing awful. She will start a new full blown Cold War, unleash the PC gauleiters, spent a fuckton of money on chasing the climate change chimera, ensure that the UK is at the back of the queue for a trade deal and allow the crooked bastards that run Wall Street and inhabit the corridors of Capitol Hill to carry on business as usual. Trump wants to drain the swamp, Clinton just wants to fill it up with even more effluent.Hah! I'm not voting for Hillary. And you aren't voting for Trump. So why does your opinion carry more weight?
some imagination instead of plodding right down Cold War 2.0 is called for yes. I do not want a computer for POTUS, I want a nimble mind.You think a POTUS that is 'spontaneous' is a good idea?
The Clinton campaign’s recent attacks on Donald Trump for his comments about a beauty queen’s weight problems were months in the making, according to an opposition research report uncovered in emails released by WikiLeaks on Sunday.
Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton invoked those comments during the first presidential debate on Sept. 26. Near the end of the showdown, during a sustained riff about the Republican nominee's past remarks about women, Clinton cited the case of Miss Universe 1996 Alicia Machado.
“And one of the worst things he said was about a woman in a beauty contest,” Clinton said. “He loves beauty contests, supporting them and hanging around them. And he called this woman ‘Miss Piggy.’ Then he called her ‘Miss Housekeeping,’ because she was Latina. Donald, she has a name.”
Trump responded: “Where did you find this?”
The answer is: in a 157-page opposition research file that Clinton’s campaign had been using since at least Dec. 19, 2015, the day research director Tony Carrk emailed it – and research files on Sens. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio – to Clinton Campaign Chairman John Podesta. Podesta’s emails were subsequently hacked and more than
So why are you such an appalling arselicker then?Hah! I'm not voting for Hillary. And you aren't voting for Trump. So why does your opinion carry more weight?
of course i "realized"she was her next POTUS - am I supposed to just get in line for a lying warmonger?..I'm not voting for her. Odd that you didn't realize...as I did...in '12, that she was our next POTUS. When you refuse to play this game anymore, you see with amazing clarity.
Whereas your hatred has blinded you, and you sink farther and farther into an obsessive mess. You scour her emails like some peeping Tom who stands out in the rain with his cock in is hand.
Now...if you're saying that you don't believe Hillary's methods are the same as Bush's attack on Kerry, then I stand corrected. I apologize for the moron comment, as I sit and worry about just how low you will sink before we crown our new POTUS.