Ishmael Pequod
Banned
You don't have to accept it.
Why didn't GLAAD accept Phil Robertson's views? Leftists lie. That's all you need to know.
You don't have to accept it.
why should society feel compelled to get you to believe anything?You are redefining marriage. I don't accept it. It may be legal, but you can't make me believe it is marriage.
Everything???
and yet, I'll bet you still wear cotton and polyester clothing together. I bet you still eat shellfish.
So PiMP's view of the bible is the correct view, and everyone on either side of HIS view - from Rev. Phelps on one side to ME on the other - has got it all wrong.
Yeah... That makes a lot of fucking sense.
unnecessary, as Christ relieved us of the obligation to follow the Levitical code.......since you've been a minister you were aware of that, of course......
unnecessary, as Christ relieved us of the obligation to follow the Levitical code.......since you've been a minister you were aware of that, of course......
So PiMP's view of the bible is the correct view, and everyone on either side of HIS view - from Rev. Phelps on one side to ME on the other - has got it all wrong.
why should society feel compelled to get you to believe anything?
Why didn't GLAAD accept Phil Robertson's views? Leftists lie. That's all you need to know.
I was aware of that... You were the one who said you believed everything the bible had to tell us. By the way... Can you point to some words in red that condemn abortion?unnecessary, as Christ relieved us of the obligation to follow the Levitical code.......since you've been a minister you were aware of that, of course......
bullshit. What happens negatively in YOUR life when gays marry?
....there are Christians who believe they must follow the levitical code....
certainly, not to derail the thread but "Thou shall not murder" covers it......I was aware of that... You were the one who said you believed everything the bible had to tell us. By the way... Can you point to some words in red that condemn abortion?
(See my thread)
Phil Robertson's comments appeared inflammatory. He represents those companies because those companies pay him so much money (as per contract). This is why companies that employ you give you a contract. Phil Robertson is not free to be a bigot or a racist. If that was the case they wouldn't pay him a cent. If you ever worked for a McDonalds or a grocery store you ought to read that fine print. You aren't free to say what you think pubically.
And this is really the crux of the matter. I am an electrician by trade. We were doing some work for a local Pepsi bottling plant. One of the Pepsi drivers got fired because he had Coca Cola in his home fridge. You work for a company, you play by their rules. I have a friend who is straight who worked for a company that was owned by gay men. They decided that all of the corporate meeting would be held in the hot tub in the buff. My friend quit. You work for a company, you follow their rules.(See my thread)
Phil Robertson's comments appeared inflammatory. He represents those companies because those companies pay him so much money (as per contract). This is why companies that employ you give you a contract. Phil Robertson is not free to be a bigot or a racist. If that was the case they wouldn't pay him a cent. If you ever worked for a McDonalds or a grocery store you ought to read that fine print. You aren't free to say what you think pubically.
So you feel all you have to do is say his speech is I flammatory and you then feel you have the right to mess with him? Who in the hell do you think you are?
really?......do they offer sacrifices?......I'm not familiar with that denomination......
certainly, not to derail the thread but "Thou shall not murder" covers it......
Neither am I. My wife's pastor was telling me about a group of Christians who still followed several parts of the levitical law. I'll ask him about it next time I see him.
A and E has the right to fire him, or rehire him at their pleasure. Companies are allowed to look out for their corporate image.
