FALSE unless you can show me a Cite?
And if you are correct... it was reversed, why? Becuase I was CORRECT.
We need to nominate, then elect Herman Cain!
- Thread starter Dixie - In Memoriam
- Start date
FALSE unless you can show me a Cite?
And if you are correct... it was reversed, why? Becuase I was CORRECT.
THen ole' Supercandy and Damocles will jump all over me for starting a thread when its already being discussed somewhere else.
Alias
Banned
YOU are the one making an excuse for not starting a thread.
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
I don't care to discuss it in my thread about nominating and electing Herman Cain, because it's a completely different topic. That's one of my pet peeves with this place, you fucktards can't stay on message, you have to ruin every thread you participate in, by either detracting, diverting, distracting, or turning it into a shit throwing contest. For once, I would like to see a thread stay on topic! Just once! But I guess that's too much to ask of illiterate nincompoops like you?
I know you dont care to discuss it.
You are the one who wants a new thread, start one, Ill agree to discuss it in your new thread. Otherwise I understand why you would not want to flesh this out any further.
Alias
Banned
Not working on me. I've already proved you wrong.
How? Dixie already ran... you should run also. You are wrong here.
christiefan915
Catalyst
That ruling was overturned on appeal. Funny how you think this means Shari'ah law is encroaching instead of thinking that a judge made a bad decision against the woman, as the courts have done numerous times when it comes to restraining orders. Your fears are irrational.
"In considering the woman's plea for a restraining order after the couple divorced, Charles ruled in June 2009 that a preponderance of the evidence showed the defendant had harassed and assaulted her, but "The court believes that [defendant] was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when and whether he wanted to, was something that was consistent with his practices and it was something that was not prohibited."
Charles' ruling was overturned last month by New Jersey's Appellate Court, which ruled that the husband's religious beliefs were irrelevant and that the judge, in taking them into consideration, "was mistaken."
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2010/08/0...measures-alarmed-judges-ruling/#ixzz1asqPbMYa
christiefan915
Catalyst
In which country?
"Muslims believe sharia is God's law, but they differ as to what exactly it entails.[2] Modernists, traditionalists and fundamentalists all hold different views of sharia, as do adherents to different schools of Islamic thought and scholarship. Different countries, societies and cultures have varying interpretations of sharia as well."
poet
Banned
Indeed. A non sequitur, and code word designed to instill fear and dread in Americans too stupid to differentiate between the rule of law and separation of church and state.
Alias
Banned
No link. Why are you afraid to post a link when you copy and paste?
Alias
Banned
Court cases are already using Sharia Law in the USA. That's why states are passing laws forbidding it. You're in over you're head again.
So, answer the question posed to you previously.....
Should individuals be prohibited from contracting to use whatever rules they choose as long as they are not unconshonable? Should I be allowed to have a pre-nump seting forth my own set of rules to outline how assets will be devided in the case of Divorce?
What if the rules my wife and I agree to are Sharia law?
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
Hey, you illiterate moron, I've already asked you what the fuck is "unconshonable?" You told me to "sound it out" but whenever I do that, the Greek people laugh at me for ordering gyros, because they don't serve an orientation-stabilizing device to eat. So let me help you rephrase your question, since you appear to be too stupid to do that... Should individuals be prohibited from contracting to use whatever rules they choose as long as they are not unconstitutional? And the answer is, no.
Dixie - In Memoriam
New member
Sharia doesn't allow you wife to agree to anything unless you say so. Under Sharia, women do not have equal rights to men. What part of that are you failing to understand?
christiefan915
Catalyst
Interesting that you think forgetting to post a link equates to fear of posting a link. Interesting to me anyway, since I know you hard-line conservatives are ruled by fear.
(2008) Sharia and National Law in Muslim Countries: Tensions and Opportunies for Dutch and EU Foreign Policy. Law, Governance and Development. Research & Policy Notes. Leiden: Leiden University Press.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia