We need to nominate, then elect Herman Cain!

Jughead, you can re-post my quotes and bump this thread from now until forever, it will not change Sharia or Islam. You are just plain old fashioned WRONG about this. You have chosen to believe some leftist propaganda to the contrary, because it is convenient for you to believe that and continue thinking you are right. I think you serve as a prime example of why the rest of us need to take this seriously, because people like you are too naive and foolish for your own good. In your simple little mind, you have concocted Sharia and Islam to be akin to the Left as opposed to the Right, which is the Constitution and Christianity. You've equated Sharia and Islam to Liberalism, and feel you MUST defend it against evil right wing Christians who want to destroy it, and in your warped little pea-sized brain, you think you are fighting the "good fight" here. Are we going to have to put a bullet through your head before you realize you are on the wrong side of history?

Ohh, Fun. Looks like I touched a nerve.

Can you please post any evidence what-so-ever to substantuate your claims that, for example, women have no power at all in Sharia? You completely misunderstand that Sharia is a large and complex system of law that has some provisions that subjecate women and other provisions that do not. Americans are FREE to subject themselves to Sharia, much like any other system of law, and if the courts are tasked with enforcing agreements that people enter, so be it, as long as doing so is Constitutional and not unconscionable.
 
You need to learn the definition of a "threat" dumbass.

Oh, that was one, loud and clear. Do we have to put a bullet into your head for you to...blah, blah, blah. That one would hold up in a court of law.
And just may put this forum in legal liability. I think the least that should happen to you is a month's ban. Are you worried? You should be.
 
There's Poet, per usual looking for any way to play victim in order to avoid rational debate since his positions are so pitifully weak. :)
 
Ohh, Fun. Looks like I touched a nerve.

Can you please post any evidence what-so-ever to substantuate your claims that, for example, women have no power at all in Sharia? You completely misunderstand that Sharia is a large and complex system of law that has some provisions that subjecate women and other provisions that do not. Americans are FREE to subject themselves to Sharia, much like any other system of law, and if the courts are tasked with enforcing agreements that people enter, so be it, as long as doing so is Constitutional and not unconscionable.

You are a FOOL! Under Sharia, you would be a FOOL without a head, because you are an abomination! Sharia is indeed a complex system of law, but it is consistently clear and concise, that women have NO authority, NO voice, NO rights which supersede the rights of men. There is NO provision under Sharia that DOESN'T subjugate women, it is consistently articulated throughout Sharia and upheld by Islam and followers of Islam. For you to even be arguing the contrary, is evidence you are an abject IDIOT who doesn't know what the fuck you're talking about.
 
Oh, that was one, loud and clear. Do we have to put a bullet into your head for you to...blah, blah, blah. That one would hold up in a court of law.
And just may put this forum in legal liability. I think the least that should happen to you is a month's ban. Are you worried? You should be.

You're so full of shit.
If you're so sure it would stand up in court, then file charges; you dumb ass.
Otherwise, STFU and STFD.
 
You are a FOOL! Under Sharia, you would be a FOOL without a head, because you are an abomination! Sharia is indeed a complex system of law, but it is consistently clear and concise, that women have NO authority, NO voice, NO rights which supersede the rights of men. There is NO provision under Sharia that DOESN'T subjugate women, it is consistently articulated throughout Sharia and upheld by Islam and followers of Islam. For you to even be arguing the contrary, is evidence you are an abject IDIOT who doesn't know what the fuck you're talking about.

You are likely correct, under Sharia I would likely be headless, because I would not stand for such a take over of my beloved America. You however, would do very well under a government that stones people for not following your religous belifes.

Please show me where Women have NO rights, because in my very little bit of review I have seen where women do have some rights. I have never advocated to have Sharia take over anything, I simply belive that Sharia should be treated as anyother set of rules would be treated in the United States, Freedom, Liberty and Democracy depend on it!
 
You are likely correct, under Sharia I would likely be headless, because I would not stand for such a take over of my beloved America. You however, would do very well under a government that stones people for not following your religous belifes.

Please show me where Women have NO rights, because in my very little bit of review I have seen where women do have some rights. I have never advocated to have Sharia take over anything, I simply belive that Sharia should be treated as anyother set of rules would be treated in the United States, Freedom, Liberty and Democracy depend on it!

I dislike a ton of what Sharia has to offer, the idea that women are "mentally deficient" so it takes two women to testify to equal the testimony of 1 male... Imagine a woman needing another woman to testify at her rape trial because the testimony of her attacker counts for twice hers...
 
I dislike a ton of what Sharia has to offer, the idea that women are "mentally deficient" so it takes two women to testify to equal the testimony of 1 male... Imagine a woman needing another woman to testify at her rape trial because the testimony of her attacker counts for twice hers...

I agree with this. I dislike it also. I also dislike when Christians claim that women should be subservent to men also.
 
Last edited:
I agree with this. I dislike it also. I also dislike when Christians claim that women should be subservent to men also.

Actually in Galatians is specifically says that women are equal to men in the Bible. You may dislike what Christians have to say, but a "they claim" is far different than hadiths and scripture directly stating women are "mentally deficient" as the reason you need two to meet the standard of "one man" in a court...
 
I agree with this. I dislike it also. I also dislike when Christians claim that women should be subservent to men also.

it doesn't......it says that wives should submit to their husbands.....in the same passage it says husbands should submit to their wives.....and children should submit to their parents......in the original text it's one sentence, with one verb for all three statements......are you going to twist that text to claim women should be subservient to rapists?........
 
it doesn't......it says that wives should submit to their husbands.....in the same passage it says husbands should submit to their wives.....and children should submit to their parents......in the original text it's one sentence, with one verb for all three statements......are you going to twist that text to claim women should be subservient to rapists?........

Many men have used the passage to justify raping their wives. Now say they don't.
 
Many men have used the passage to justify raping their wives. Now say they don't.

I'm not aware of such......though I will admit, I've never knowingly spoken with any man who raped his wife......if it has happened, it would be as stupid as Jarod's argument......
 
it doesn't......it says that wives should submit to their husbands.....in the same passage it says husbands should submit to their wives.....and children should submit to their parents......in the original text it's one sentence, with one verb for all three statements......are you going to twist that text to claim women should be subservient to rapists?........

I am not talking about what the bible says, I am talking about what some Christian Churches teach. I agree with you that the True Bible, the spirit of the bible, does not say women are to be subservant to husbands, but that is taught to many Christians. The King James Version flat out says it in many places. My sister was lecturing me about it just the other day, she learned it from her wacko mainstreem warehouse of a mega-church. You cant read the Bible and take it as flat out law. What we call the bible has been edited and rewritten many times and was written many years after Christ's death. You have to read it and then edit it in what you belive to be the true spirit of the bible.
 
Last edited:
I am not talking about what the bible says, I am talking about what some Christian Churches teach. I agree with you that the Bible does not say women are to be subservant to husbands, but that is taught to many Christians. My sister was lecturing me about it just the other day, she learned it from her wacko mainstreem warehouse of a mega-church.
So your sister's a retard, and speaks for all of Christianity?
 
DAMO...

King James Disagrees with you...

Submitting yourselves one to another in the fear of God. Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and He is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church: For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. This is a great mystery: but I speak concerning Christ and the church. Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband" (Ephesians 5:21-33).

"Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in everything" (Ephesians 5:24).

"For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man." (I Corinthians 11:8-9)

"Let the women learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression." (I Timothy 2:11-14)
 
Last edited:
Women are to submit themselves unto there husbands...

Men are to love there wives.

Two different things.
 
Back
Top