Wasn't the Secret Service guy supposed to refute Hutchinson?

If the SS agrees with Hutchinson why doesn't the J6 committee subpoena him to testify? Oh right that is because his testimony would destroy Hutchinson's testimony. The SS will never be given the opportunity to impeach her testimony.

Those agents don't need to wait for J6. If they want to come out and make statements, any network will welcome them. They won't because unlike Hutchinson, they're pussies, hiding under twump's skirt.
 
"A source close to the Secret Service"

What source? Who is this source? And this was three weeks ago, where's the follow up????????

Our twumptard members are trying desperately to trash a courageous young woman. Such pussies. Just another day in twump world.
 
First of all, you don't know if the SS agrees with Hutchinson or not because all you have is an anonymous "source close to the Secret Service"...so it's not even the Secret Service, it's "a source close to the Secret Service" that you are running with here; an unnamed source, who is NOT in the Secret Service, from three weeks ago.

You got grifted AGAIN because you're a fucking sucker and everyone knows it now.

You're such a fucking sucker that I bet you bought into a timeshare and you got the undercoat protection for your jalopi.




What testimony? All you have is a tweet that references "a source close to the Secret Service".

You're basing your entire argument on that tweet from three weeks ago that has never been followed up.




Sure they have. Everyone has an open invitation to testify before the committee, and all you have is "a source close to the Secret Service", but you don't know who that source is, or if the source is even real.

Nice. ExcessPain's nothing but a wing nut troll with a traumatic brain injury.
 
It's looking that way with the Pelosi Punch and Judy show. :dunno:

That committee is not seeking truth.

LOL - translation: You wish they'd shut up because their exposing your lord and savior as an evil traitor who cares nothing about America.

Also, you suck.
 
He's an obnoxious NYer, but he was a good president.

He was a traitorous moron who hopped up a bunch of your fellow white supremacists and attacked our democracy. He knowingly sent armed rioters into our Capitol to disrupt our peaceful transition of power and kill his political enemies. There are people on audio and video discussing it.

You're an idiot.
 
Just because she worked in the Trump administration doesn't mean she was loyal to him. And do I really have to explain what a "pro Trump" witness is? I mean, I know you haven't seen one in this "hearing" (and you won't), but c'mon! It's self-explanatory even for you.



Hearings like this aren't about "the truth". This one's about preventing Donald Trump from getting a second term. Be careful what you wish for. You can't stop people from running on Trump ideas.



Of course they do! And they're not cheerleaders, they're defense witnesses.

Who are the people willing to testify? What are their names? Cassidy Hutchinson wasn't afraid to reveal her name. Why don't your SS buddies do it?
 
Well I don't lie here, so you are a fucking idiot.

You have to be to talk shit for two months about a stolen election and then pussy out on JPP the one day you could have done something about it.

Just leads me to think you're insincere and even you don't believe a single fucking thing you squirt out here.

People like Matt are just so full of rage that they lost in 2020 and their coup failed it's blocking their blood to their brains.
 
Annnnnd once again…they’re the SECRET service, they have SECRETS, so how do you know if they’re the actual secret service or not? But if it helps, close your eyes and dream about the impeachment “whistle blower”.

They don't need to keep their names secret. It's not a national security issue to testify whether twump knew his rioters were armed or not or wanted to go to the capitol. They could issue public statements today if they wanted. But like you they're pussies.
 
"A source CLOSE to the Secret Service" is not in the Secret Service...they are "close" to it.

About as close to the Secret Service as I am to the Atlanta Braves.

Even if the source was the SS its not a national security matter to make statements about the former president's activities as it relates to his transition from office. It's America's business.
 
Wasn't the Secret Service guy supposed to refute Hutchinson?

I think this goes into the "I'm Going to Build A Wall, and Mexico is going to pay for it" category! :laugh:
 
They are investigating NOTHING. They are just trying to make it difficult if not impossible for Trump to run in '24. They've admitted it here and elsewhere. And they're doing this because they've done nothing constructive for the country and its a distraction for the harm they've caused. ..

They? Democrats? So what? Most of them are overly-emotional idiots. Why should I give a shit about them? Why do a bunch of pussified she-males scare you so much???
 
That's not my argument, that's Trump's.

Because she doesn't have sufficient loyalty, she's not to be trusted...that's your argument and it's pretty fucking weak considering she worked for Trump for a long-ass time.

She said the thing that turned her off was twump's tweet while the insurrectionists were inside the capitol. Then twump waited hours to call them off despite everyone from Sean Hannity to Don Jr. texting Meadows begging him to ask twump to call of his dogs. But twump didn't.. he wanted to see if it worked.
 
Back
Top