Into the Night
Verified User
Not in this case. Your position is irrational. You literally support a position that goes against your own self interest. Like a MAGA.
MAGA isn't a person.
Fallacy fallacy. He made no paradox.
Not in this case. Your position is irrational. You literally support a position that goes against your own self interest. Like a MAGA.
I give credit where credit is due.
You seem to forget about nuclear power, developed by private industry; or hydroelectric power, developed by private industry; or coal, methane, or any source of cheap energy that is in use today.
Wind is the 2nd most expensive method of generating energy, watt for watt. It only exists because of socialism. Solar is the most expensive. It also only exists because of socialism. Neither of these forms of energy can compete in an open market.
He does. Better than YOU do!WRONGO. You didn't even understand that point did you?
Buzzword fallacy. There are no such things as 'tipping points' in either weather or climate. There is nothing to 'fix'.We have waaay more than 12 years....but the problem is that maybe within those 12 years we will blow past so many "tipping points" (that we don't even realize at the time) that it effectively means that we won't be able to fix it after that.
Make what worse??? Be specific.We will still go along as normal and you denialists and "skeptics" will go on complaining about AGW while it steadily makes things much worse in about 50 to 100 years.
Fixing what?That's the whole point of the "12 year" thing. You won't necessarily see much different (except more swings in the weather) at 12 years. But folks many decades later will be able to point to our time as being the time that we frittered away our last chances at fixing it.
One would hope so....
Do you wanna cookie?
you mean corrupted computer models, that use bogus metrics?
Been there /done that.
When AGW is blamed for the main reason forglobal warming -not increased solar activity -
can see the whole thing is bogus
Also the compute "modeling" is impossible to verify, since we dont even fully understand climate change
But if you want to believe it -fine by me -just dont try to sell me on renewables being able to replace fossil fuels .
It's a scam and it's impossible to construct that many solar panels/windmills/ compost heaps etc.
And beautiful ships they were and are, too. In Washington, we have the Lady Washington, a brig that still sails the world over. She once appeared in the Pirates of the Caribbean movies as the HMS Interceptor. The Lady Washington was built in 1989 in Aberdeen, WA, where she still berths. Each season, the takes on a new crew to teach them how to sail these tall masted beauties.Of course there is but not by a significant amount. You actually believe that suddenly (within the next 25 years) we'll all be able to drive solar power vehicles or convert all shipping back to wind power? You do realize we have the technology to power shipping with wind, don't you? It's called "sails".
Yeah...the old Hitler routine. How tiresome.Any? You have me confused with somebody else. I own and use a solar powered wristwatch.
Yet you invoke Trump in the same way. A sure sign of desperation in a debate AFAIC.
Science isn't models. Science is a set of falsifiable theories..Couple points:
EVERY Science uses models
No, that would be YOU.YOU don't know a thing about models
No such thing.You wouldn't know a good one from a corrupted one.
Models are not a measurement.No you haven't. You don't even understand what is measured.
Nonsense response. Go read his statement again.Too bad people who actually study the sun disagree with you.
No, that would be YOU. It is YOU discarding the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.You don't know a THING about science! LOL.
Science isn't a university or degree.Guess I'll take my university degree in geology and believe it in peace then.
There is no such thing as 'fossil fuels'. Fossils don't burn. We don't use them for fuel.What in god's name do YOU know about fossil fuels?
Science isn't models.
There is no such thing as 'fossil fuels'. Fossils don't burn. We don't use them for fuel.
I don't know why you keep pulling random words out of thin air. Define 'clean energy'. Define 'big energy'.I don't know why you keep pulling random numbers out of thin air. I'm saying that there is systemic resistance to clean energy because it costs big energy money that they don't want to lose or invest, and the government is owned and controlled by money.
MAGA isn't a person.Then there are the MAGA types
Convert to what?? Define 'clean energy'.who don't want to convert
No science here...move along...move along...because they don't understand science
Science isn't 'progress'. Define this 'progress'.and think every thing even remotely sounding like progress is evil.
YOU brought up Hitler (yet again).That's the MAGA comparison I made, and it's true. Clutch your pearls about Hitler to someone else.
With what? Why do you want government interference with markets?We can be replacing our power plants now.
With what? EVs?? Toyota just announced they are abandoning EVs. There just is no significant market for them.We can be replacing our vehicles now.
So...fascism and communism.The only small scales we've achieved have been the work of governments and activists.
Sure. Government should get OUT of trying to 'manage' (dictate) energy markets. Over 99% of the cars and trucks on the road today use oil products.I understand that you claim to be open to some form of conversion, but that's not what the far right wants as a policy. They think we should be drilling more oil and mining more coal.
Because they did.I'm not sure what people mean when they say environmentalists have gone from calling it "global warming" to "climate change."
Yeah, it was about a couple of decades now, but it's based on the same stupid religion.For starters, it has been that way for 2 decades now - it's not some "sudden" thing. And everyone who understands climate even the smallest bit knows that it IS global warming, but that leads to more extreme weather events, including extreme cold & snow.
No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing.I think environmentalists started switching to "climate change" (years ago) because they realized poorly informed conservatives would always see cold weather events as "proof" that global warming doesn't exist. Because that's all the right cares about - they don't want to have an honest conversation about the health of our planet. Ever.
Yes it is. It is a fundamentalist style religion.It's not a church, dude
So did I. We somewhat agree on that point. It is, however still the Church of Global Warming.- and I addressed the alleged "rebranding."
Nah. No 'gotcha'. Just pointing out the theories of science you discard and the mathematics you discard.What you're doing is distracting from the actual conversation by trying to find some sort of "gotcha."
Did it get caught with it's hands in the cookie jar?The planet is in real trouble.
Buzzwords are not an issue.This is a non-partisan issue,
Save it from what? Define The Problem.and it's only a matter of time before we're all on board with trying to save the only home we have.
Ask Into The Night about the ovens and thermometers. It's funny!![]()
Because they all deny and discard the same theories of science and the same mathematics, just like you do. They are nothing more than high priests in the Church of Global Warming.over 95 percent of climate scientists believe in the essentially same global warming.
Geese don't measure temperature or CO2.The geese are an observation that shows it is staying warmer, longer just as predicted.
Somebody must've been feeding them. A lot of geese never even bother to fly south.They flew off 6 weeks later than they used to.
You are describing yourself again.I would have a better chance talking sense to a goose than you. You use such slanted terms.
Religion is not science, dude.Global warming is science.
Never heard of a church for ants.Ant global warming is like a church based on belief. Of course, you have it backward.
So the temperatures on ovens are a lie?![]()
I don't know why you keep pulling random words out of thin air. Define 'clean energy'. Define 'big energy'.
MAGA isn't a person.
Convert to what?? Define 'clean energy'.
No science here...move along...move along...
Science isn't 'progress'. Define this 'progress'.
YOU brought up Hitler (yet again).
With what? Why do you want government interference with markets?
With what? EVs?? Toyota just announced they are abandoning EVs. There just is no significant market for them.
So...fascism and communism.
Sure. Government should get OUT of trying to 'manage' (dictate) energy markets. Over 99% of the cars and trucks on the road today use oil products.