Was Global Warming responsible for the many deaths in freezing-snow packed Buffalo?

Into the Night said:
A 'global warming scientist' is nothing more than a high priest in the Church of Global Warming. They routinely discard science and mathematics, just like you do.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth. You can't create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.
Click to expand...

Tell us again how there are not enough thermometers in the world. :laugh:
 
anonymoose said:
Good. That’s what some extremists have said.
So what’s your timetable for the elimination of petroleum based energy before we all die?
Should all petro based nrg be eliminated?
If not, what percent?
Assuming you answer honestly, from where do you get this data and what will the effect on the weather after implementation?

All I hear is either very vague requirements or extreme positions for the elimination of all petroleum nrg within x number of years.
Click to expand...

The Church of Green has been saying we will run out of oil in the next 20 years for some 70 years now.
Fortunately, oil is a renewable resource. We drill more oil than ever before now (with the exception of unconstitutional edicts issued by our current Chief Puppet. Fortunately for all, the courts threw that out.
 
BartenderElite said:
The certainly have NOT been wrong about everything. Most of what we're seeing now was predicted - disappearing habitat, a mass exctinction, the oceanic food supply on the brink.
Click to expand...

The lack of food in the oceans is mostly because of over fishing, not climate problems. Disappearing habitat is mostly because of increasing human populations converting the planet to our purposes not the climate....as for the claim of mass extinction of species that is not at all a sure thing yet and again would probably be due to human driven things like the spread of chemicals and other toxins not climate change.
 
Into the Night said:
The Church of Green has been saying we will run out of oil in the next 20 years for some 70 years now.
Fortunately, oil is a renewable resource. We drill more oil than ever before now (with the exception of unconstitutional edicts issued by our current Chief Puppet. Fortunately for all, the courts threw that out.
Click to expand...

It's not a church. Repeating that it is doesn't make it so, dude.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
The lack of food in the oceans is mostly because of over fishing, not climate problems. Disappearing habitat is mostly because of increasing human populations converting the planet to our purposes not the climate....as for the claim of mass extinction of species that is not at all a sure thing yet and again would probably be due to human driven things like the spread of chemicals and other toxins not climate change.
Click to expand...

That isn't a very in-depth analysis.

The way we produce and consume energy isn't sustainable. Period.
 
BartenderElite said:
It's embarrassing that conservatives still bring up the "Ice Age" cover story from the '70s.

It's like, someone was wrong a half a century ago - so let's ignore everything else when it comes to the health of the planet.
Click to expand...

That story is so old I don't even know it.
 
anonymoose said:
Youtube is your friend.
Click to expand...

I'll let you figure her quote out for yourself. I know you are smart enough.

"Millennials*and Gen Z*and all these folks that come after us*are looking up, and we're like,*'The world is going to end in 12 years if we don't address climate change, and your biggest issue is how are we gonna pay for it?' "

BTW, the figure came from the IPCC report. It talks about the beginning of irreparable damages past between 2030 and 2050.
 
Into the Night said:
The Church of Green has been saying we will run out of oil in the next 20 years for some 70 years now.
Click to expand...

Wow. You don't even know the details of Peak Oil??? Wow. You sure are stupid.

Fortunately, oil is a renewable resource. We drill more oil than ever before now (with the exception of unconstitutional edicts issued by our current Chief Puppet. Fortunately for all, the courts threw that out.
Click to expand...

You don't have a clue. It's hilarious to see you flail at chemistry.
 
Diesel said:
I don't know what the timeframe is. There is obviously debate.

What is mind numbingly stupid is what the right wants to do: Take no steps to reduce consumption of a non-renewable resource that pollutes the environment. Not only that, but we should use it faster and pollute more. It is a galactic intellectual failing of a particular type of person.
Click to expand...

You still haven't defined this 'pollution'. Oil is a renewable resource.
 
Diesel said:
Diesel is a clothing brand.

The globe is not freezing. What just happened in most of the country, including Buffalo, is a result of climate change exacerbated by human activity. That is not disputable, but maybe you can tell us that COVID doesn't exist and windmills cause cancer.
Click to expand...

Define 'climate change'. What is this 'human activity' you speak of?
Covid19 does exist. It is but one variant of several dozen in the Covid/SARS series of viruses. None of them kill.
Windmills don't cause cancer. They are, however, the 2nd most expensive method of generating electricity, watt for watt.
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
No. The GT paper is not a scientific paper. Their article is a propaganda exercise pretending to be a scientific paper. This is indicated by their extensive efforts to explain basic undergraduate physics. No real scientific paper explains basic undergraduate physics, because scientific papers are targeted at an audience of professional scientists. Professional scientists already know this information in far greater depth and detail than undergraduates.

The audience for their article is the slightly technical public that infests climate denier blogs.

Gerlich and Tscheuschner are simply two individuals who have no understanding of atmospheric physics or the greenhouse effect. They are attempting to gain the attention and respect of climate deniers who also do not understand the greenhouse effect.

It’s a classic case of “the blind leading the blind”. That's where you come in!

Try again Poindexter! :laugh:
Click to expand...

Sorry, dude. You are STILL ignoring the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top