Trumppers… huge win for Walker?

AProudLefty said:
If it is "easily resolved" as you say, then why is it in the bill?

Just answer the question and get over with it. Unless you like to be punished.
Click to expand...

This is attention whoring, and gives her "double Os," even though to normal ppl it appears to be an epic Toxic ass-kicking. lol
 
In the future, if you get someone to run interference for you try to find someone who knows what they're talking about:laugh:
 
TOP said:
We've discussed what happens if a child is "falsely accused"...many times... easily resolved... but do share your story... why are you hesitating now?
Click to expand...

If you had said it's because you worship and adore DeSantis, your savior, then that would have been over.
 
TOP said:
Boys and the boys teams...girls on the girls teams.. if there's any question ?birth certificate school records previous medical records and if necessary DNA test .....but that won't even be necessary...There...That was easy....
Click to expand...

So you think Life is Golden is retarded? That isn't very nice to your "students".
 
Definitely find someone who knows what they're talking about...at least one...;)
 
TOP said:
It won't happen
Click to expand...

You said it "very probably" wouldn't happen, which isn't the same thing.

So you moved the goalposts, got caught moving the goalposts, and are now stalling.


There's never been a debate here by the way
Click to expand...

So at least now you recognize that there is a potential for malicious use of the law.

Baby steps.
 
TOP said:
If you've read the bill why don't you understand it?
Click to expand...

i do understand it, it's you who is denying the words on the page.

That came before you hedged your own position.

So you said earlier that malicious use of the law would "never happen", then you shifted that to "very probably will never happen".

So that means there is a possibility for it to occur, and you've admitted as such.

So who does this bill actually protect? Not kids, but perverts who want to leer at naked kids.

And you support it.
 
LV426 said:
i do understand it, it's you who is denying the words on the page.

That came before you hedged your own position.

So you said earlier that malicious use of the law would "never happen", then you shifted that to "very probably will never happen".

So that means there is a possibility for it to occur, and you've admitted as such.

So who does this bill actually protect? Not kids, but perverts who want to leer at naked kids.

And you support it.
Click to expand...

I'd say the victory here is yours. The dumb twat is down to repeating the same b.s. over and over. Good job.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
At least she's given up gossiping and self-petting for a while to actually attempt to discuss something political -- on a political discussion platform. And now we all see why she so seldom does that
Click to expand...

Top should stay in her lane, I just am not sure that lying is a lane to stay in...
 
TOP said:
that's why I told you not to worry
Click to expand...

There is nothing in the bill that supports anything you're saying.

The bill offers no options...all the bill does is make it legal for pervert Conservatives to pull down kids' pants and stare at their genitals.
 
TOP said:
and in the end you've got nothing... but a lot of wasted posts...;)
Click to expand...

Consciousness of guilt.

Top is projecting her insecurities and deficiencies on me because she fucked up the debate for herself with her big, fat mouth.
 
TOP said:
We've discussed what happens if a child is "falsely accused"...many times
Click to expand...

Nope. Not once have you ever discussed it. In fact, you maintained that there wouldn't even BE any false accusations.

Now that you are realizing there are, you're making shit up about the remedies for a false accusation.

I gave you the bill so you could show us all what you're talking about, and you squandered that opportunity because you don't know what you're talking about.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top