Trouble/Challenges in Milwaukee

Darth Hussein Omar said:
There's no putting a happy face on this one. The victim wasn't innocent but a perp; and he was shot by a black cop. Apparently we're supposed to believe black cops are in on the black genocide too.

It's obvious to many, many, people that racial discord has been ginned up by BLM, a media that refuses to challenge the BLM assumptions; an administration that picks sides in local issues involving race; a racial greviance industry that no one will challenge either out fear of being called racist or out of rank political considerations [theyre afraid to lose the black vote] or both.

And all of this is going on in urban areas run by liberals, many of them black, and run according to liberal policies.

To say it isn't working, is a gross understatement. And if Hillary wins the WH, it will only get worse and not better.
Click to expand...

Have you given much thought as to why eventhough the cop was black there is still trouble??
 
cawacko said:
Most people live in the nicest, safest with best school neighborhoods they can afford. That's generally universal.

The Bay Area is known as the bastion of progressivism yet have forced out many blacks because they don't allow new housing to be built here and blacks get oriced out. Is that subconscious racism?

I don't but the argument that a country that is about 60% white and 10% black is all racist because there exists white and black neighborhoods
Click to expand...

I think, to be honest, it depends on the area. I know there are prejudices and biases in all walks of life. I think certain groups, both black and whites distrust "outsiders". The old rich doesn't like the new rich.

I agree with you for the most part, people live where they can afford to live, but there are still people who resent or try to stop others from changing what others perceive is "their place". You know "movin on up, to the Eastside"
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
There's no putting a happy face on this one. The victim wasn't innocent but a perp; and he was shot by a black cop. Apparently we're supposed to believe black cops are in on the black genocide too.

It's obvious to many, many, people that racial discord has been ginned up by BLM, a media that refuses to challenge the BLM assumptions; an administration that picks sides in local issues involving race; a racial greviance industry that no one will challenge either out fear of being called racist or out of rank political considerations [theyre afraid to lose the black vote] or both.

And all of this is going on in urban areas run by liberals, many of them black, and run according to liberal policies.

To say it isn't working, is a gross understatement. And if Hillary wins the WH, it will only get worse and not better.
Click to expand...

Wait until the relatives file a multi-million dollar lawsuit, against the city, and the city settles out of Court. :palm:
 
Rana said:
I think, to be honest, it depends on the area. I know there are prejudices and biases in all walks of life. I think certain groups, both black and whites distrust "outsiders". The old rich doesn't like the new rich.

I agree with you for the most part, people live where they can afford to live, but there are still people who resent or try to stop others from changing what others perceive is "their place". You know "movin on up, to the Eastside"
Click to expand...

I've followed a long running debate among black friends in Oakland about whether black peoole should stay or move out. (Some of this occurred before gentrification pushing them out anyway.)

One side of the argument said they were sick of oakland crime and bad schools and moved out. Others said they were staying in Oakland because they wanted to be role models for the kids growing up without fathers and who don't have successful black men living around them as role models.

So if living around people who look like you is a bad thing then many blacks moving out of Oakland would be considered a good thing by that standard. But what should a white person who thinks black communities are bad say to this debate/argument?
 
Rana said:
I think, to be honest, it depends on the area. I know there are prejudices and biases in all walks of life. I think certain groups, both black and whites distrust "outsiders". The old rich doesn't like the new rich.

I agree with you for the most part, people live where they can afford to live, but there are still people who resent or try to stop others from changing what others perceive is "their place". You know "movin on up, to the Eastside"
Click to expand...

Interestingly enough 538 talks about people living near people who agree with them politically. We are self segregating that way as well.
 
cawacko said:
I've followed a long running debate among black friends in Oakland about whether black peoole should stay or move out. (Some of this occurred before gentrification pushing them out anyway.)

One side of the argument said they were sick of oakland crime and bad schools and moved out. Others said they were staying in Oakland because they wanted to be role models for the kids growing up without fathers and who don't have successful black men living around them as role models.

So if living around people who look like you is a bad thing then many blacks moving out of Oakland would be considered a good thing by that standard. But what should a white person who thinks black communities are bad say to this debate/argument?
Click to expand...
I don't know, you have to ask them, I don't have problems with communities as long as they don't discriminate.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
OH WELL - FUCK!!

The real estate agent was a Black woman, so that is proof that Rana isn't a bigot and a racist; because I'm sure the real estate agent took Rana's liberalism into account. :palm:
Click to expand...

Hilarious isn't it?

And apparently Rancid fell back asswards into her house with zero forethought as to where she was moving to
 
I Love America said:
Hilarious isn't it?

And apparently Rancid fell back asswards into her house with zero forethought as to where she was moving to
Click to expand...

I guess if the Real estate lady had shown her a house that was within her price range in another neighborhood, she wouldn't have taking into consideration the crack house on the corner, the drug deals going on at the corner, or the house of prostitution that was next door. :palm:
 
cawacko said:
I think people want to live in the best neighborhood they can that is the safest and has the best schools. That's something that transcends race. White people are gentrifying Oakland right now. Many people are pissed about it. So if white's move near blacks it's gentrification and considered bad and if they don't live near blacks it's because their racist.
Click to expand...

Gentrification? Now I'm not calling you out specifically because I've seen this elsewhere. But it's the kind of language that's loaded. It's really insulting to blacks, that their neighborhood sucks until white people move in and class it up.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
.

How do you know they were forced to? Maybe they wanted to live there.
Click to expand...

I didn't say they were forced to. But take a look at this blurb for city-data:

www.city-data.com/City‑Data

Stats about all US cities - real estate, relocation info, crime, house prices, schools, races, income, photos, sex offenders, maps, education, weather, home value ...

Obviously people care about the racial makeup of neighborhoods or sites like this wouldn't reference it.
 
christiefan915 said:
Why are there largely-black neighborhoods today? There are plenty of largely-white neighborhoods all over and I believe it's because they want to segregate themselves.
Click to expand...

Maybe you've got it backwards....there are black neighborhoods because THEY want to segregate themselves....you've even seen it recently at colleges were blacks advertise for black roommates....that would be called racism is if whites did the very same thing......
 
The MSM didn't even report the officer was black. They want riots. Fucking disgusting pieces of filth.
 
cawacko said:
In the early '90's the Gheto Boys were a huge rap group out of the fifth ward in Houston. The fifth ward was a largely minority and poor area. Did you look there as a potential area to live? My guess is you probably didn't and I don't blame you one bit. Most people don't choose to live in higher crime areas of they don't have to. But according to what Christi's saying here you are afraid of black people because you moved to a lily white suburb
Click to expand...

Please cawacko, I didn't say ALL people think like that. But I live in a city with plenty of racism and have seen it up close more than enough.
 
cawacko said:
To Christi's point should blacks not live in largely black communities? Do you see anything wrong with it?
Click to expand...

Should whites live in largely white communities?

Nobody "should" live where they're not happy but I'm uncomfortable with the idea of segregated communities, even if the people living there don't look at it that way.
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
There's no putting a happy face on this one. The victim wasn't innocent but a perp; and he was shot by a black cop. Apparently we're supposed to believe black cops are in on the black genocide too.

It's obvious to many, many, people that racial discord has been ginned up by BLM, a media that refuses to challenge the BLM assumptions; an administration that picks sides in local issues involving race; a racial greviance industry that no one will challenge either out fear of being called racist or out of rank political considerations [theyre afraid to lose the black vote] or both.

And all of this is going on in urban areas run by liberals, many of them black, and run according to liberal policies.

To say it isn't working, is a gross understatement. And if Hillary wins the WH, it will only get worse and not better.
Click to expand...

Ridiculous to blame BLM for what's been going on for centuries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top