The real "war on women"

Yurt said:
how did i ignore the questions by specifically asking you about them? you just can't help but lie..... if it is right there...show it and explain it. you won't because you can't.
Click to expand...

You ignored them by simply staying on track w/ your twisted logic. I explained - over & over again - what I meant by the word "distinction." It's not something that even needed explaining, really - anyone reading the original comment would be able to discern it. But you kept twisting it into something else, changing its meaning to suit whatever "gotcha" you were after (and by now, I've really lost track of the gotcha's you are after).

It's just a bit maddening. It's another thread derail for you, though - chalk it up.
 
Onceler said:
You ignored them by simply staying on track w/ your twisted logic. I explained - over & over again - what I meant by the word "distinction." It's not something that even needed explaining, really - anyone reading the original comment would be able to discern it. But you kept twisting it into something else, changing its meaning to suit whatever "gotcha" you were after (and by now, I've really lost track of the gotcha's you are after).

It's just a bit maddening. It's another thread derail for you, though - chalk it up.
Click to expand...

so you still can't explain why you admitted we were in fact talking about the war women, but that me saying war on women, is someone how twisting your words. i noticed you dodged - again - the statement concerning your logic.

you're getting so frustrated because you're cornered. you can't rationally explain your claims, so all you do is get angry and lash out.
 
Yurt said:
so you still can't explain why you admitted we were in fact talking about the war women, but that me saying war on women, is someone how twisting your words. i noticed you dodged - again - the statement concerning your logic.

you're getting so frustrated because you're cornered. you can't rationally explain your claims, so all you do is get angry and lash out.
Click to expand...

The bolded are 2 different ideas. That's what's amazing about your simplistic (or insane) way of thinking. Yes, the distinctions I was talking about fall under the category of "war on women." But the distinctions themselves are what I was talking about...not the broad, simplistic way you're trying to portray it.

It's just like when you thought I was saying you couldn't discern the distinction because you said there was "no war on women." It's a reading thing, Yurtsie. I'm sorry, but it just is.
 
Here we are at post 163 and we thought we straightened you out way back in posts 114 and 123......
 
Onceler said:
The bolded are 2 different ideas. That's what's amazing about your simplistic (or insane) way of thinking. Yes, the distinctions I was talking about fall under the category of "war on women." But the distinctions themselves are what I was talking about...not the broad, simplistic way you're trying to portray it.

It's just like when you thought I was saying you couldn't discern the distinction because you said there was "no war on women." It's a reading thing, Yurtsie. I'm sorry, but it just is.
Click to expand...

pay attention...you're still ignoring your second claim. you're running away from the question like a scared school boy. you admit it does fall under the war on women, but somehow, me saying that is shifting goal posts. it isn't. in fact, you kept responding to my posts saying "war on women" several times and you knew exactly what were talking about. you came up with this novel theory of goal post shifting when you started to flounder.
 
Yurt said:
pay attention...you're still ignoring your second claim. you're running away from the question like a scared school boy. you admit it does fall under the war on women, but somehow, me saying that is shifting goal posts. it isn't. in fact, you kept responding to my posts saying "war on women" several times and you knew exactly what were talking about. you came up with this novel theory of goal post shifting when you started to flounder.
Click to expand...

Good christ, dopey - you said my statement meant there was "No distinction in the war on women". Frankly, I don't even know what that means. For the gazillionth time, I was saying you could not discern the distinction between comedians calling names, and politicians setting policy. And you couldn't.

As for politicians setting policy, that also speaks to the difference between Franken & Maher. Do you understand any of this yet? This is yet another wonderful conversation with you. I might try to one-up it this afternoon by engaging in some debate w/ the brick wall next to me.
 
Onceler said:
Good christ, dopey - you said my statement meant there was "No distinction in the war on women". Frankly, I don't even know what that means. For the gazillionth time, I was saying you could not discern the distinction between comedians calling names, and politicians setting policy. And you couldn't.

As for politicians setting policy, that also speaks to the difference between Franken & Maher. Do you understand any of this yet? This is yet another wonderful conversation with you. I might try to one-up it this afternoon by engaging in some debate w/ the brick wall next to me.
Click to expand...


Whats preventing you from understanding "there is no difference between comedians ridicule and politicians setting policy".....
Its is all a part of the war on women, especially Conservative women.....
You trying to claim that war using guns is war, and war using propaganda is not war.....its all war....just different weapons.....are you really that dense ?

Even one of your own told you that in 114.....
 
bravo said:
Whats preventing you from understanding "there is no difference between comedians ridicule and politicians setting policy".....
Its is all a part of the war on women, especially Conservative women.....
You trying to claim that war using guns is war, and war using propaganda is not war.....its all war....just different weapons.....are you really that dense ?

Even one of your own told you that in 114.....
Click to expand...

Oh, be quiet, Muslim hater. To say that there is no difference between being called a name by someone with little to no power, and having a policy that affects you (sometimes in a dramatic way) changed by a politician or a judge WITH power, is completely inane.

Clue up.
 
Onceler said:
Oh, be quiet, Muslim hater. To say that there is no difference between being called a name by someone with little to no power, and having a policy that affects you (sometimes in a dramatic way) changed by a politician or a judge WITH power, is completely inane.

Clue up.
Click to expand...


Yeah sure.....Poor Onecell.........Limbaugh and O'Reilly have all the power, Maher, Leno, Letterman, The View, MSNBC, Sharpton, Ed Shultz, and dozens of others

don't affect public opinion at all.......

You're a fool and a hack.......

Keep defending female children mutilation, stoning, wife beating, enslavement of women in general and all the rest of what the barbarians practice.....

Poor, poor Onecell.....
 
bravo said:
Yeah sure.....Poor Onecell.........Limbaugh and O'Reilly have all the power, Maher, Leno, Letterman, The View, MSNBC, Sharpton, Ed Shultz, and dozens of others

don't affect public opinion at all.......

You're a fool and a hack.......

Keep defending female children mutilation, stoning, wife beating, enslavement of women in general and all the rest of what the barbarians practice.....

Poor, poor Onecell.....
Click to expand...

Who brought up Limbaugh & O'Reilly? Defensive much?

And who is defending FGM?

I always tell you bravs - you're old, and you're losing a lot of brain cells every day. And you ain't getting 'em back.
 
Yurt said:
lol...you jumped in and have no idea what we're talking about. and he has said he is smart. are you really that dumb?
Click to expand...


Oh I read and followed the discussion between you and Onceler since page one...just using your idiotic question as a jumping off point to highlight the inherent stupidity of your comments.
 
Yurt said:
what did i twist and what goal posts did i move?

seriously, you're a liar. you made up what i believed and dug your heels in and ran away constantly from two simple questions. you're a coward onceler.
Click to expand...

And once again. now that he's made sure the goalposts have been moved, out comes Yurt's alter ego: the clueless rube who can't figure out the answer to 2+2 and has to have everything explained to him over and over.
 
bravo said:
Here we are at post 163 and we thought we straightened you out way back in posts 114 and 123......
Click to expand...


And here I thought you were going to gather stats to prove your insane theory that genital mutilation is a widespread practice in the lives of everyday Muslims...

You remember that comment right? You made it 3-4 pages ago and have yet to actually PROVE it.
 
Onceler said:
You keep saying that. I answered the questions you had - and you ignored the answers.

I think you just like saying "you ran away" to people. It makes you feel almighty or something. I think Darla is quite correct re: the narcissism.
Click to expand...


His use of certain words and phrases is a strong indicator of his basic level of intellect.

His constant use of childish, schoolyard terminology indicates that, despite his chronological age, mentally he's a very immature, juvenile person.
 
no surprise zappa takes a play from onceler's book of debate and doesn't actually explain his conclusions or how i moved any goal posts.

i'm tired of trying to get idiots like you back up this claim. it is fucking stupid. and so sad that you two lack the brain power to explain such simple claims. onceler has completely ignored for at least a half a dozen posts his second claim of goal post moving and he still can't explain the first one without repeating the same nonsense over and over. and of course zappa runs in with absolutely nothing but ad homs because he has no clue what he is talking about. he only knows a lefty is arguing with yurt, so he just assumes i'm wrong, but can't even explain why.

you two a are waste.

carry on.
 
Azathoth said:
I have come to see that there is, indeed, a war on women taking place in the US. This war is waged by the left against conservative women. Take, for example, Bill Maher referring to Sarah Palin as a c**t and Sandra Bernhard insinuating that she hopes Sarah Palin is gang raped by black men. I am certainly no fan of Palin's, but that was unacceptable... and yet we didn't hear a peep from the left.

Now, S.E. Cupp is depicted in a fake pornographic image in Hustler magazine, for no other reason than being conservative.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/fak...e-cupp-reportedly-appears-in-hustler-graphic/

Something tells me we won't be hearing about this on MSDNC or SeeBS, though. Nor will S.E. Cupp be receiving a call from the President. Nor will many liberals on this site condemn it.

The left has a LOT of nerve to claim that conservatives are waging a "war on women" when they're pulling this sort of shit.
Click to expand...

NEW YORK, May 24 (UPI) -- All five hosts of "The View" rallied to defend U.S. conservative commentator S.E. Cupp, whom Hustler photo-shopped to look like she had a penis in her mouth.

Introducing Cupp, who was sitting in the audience, as "a friend of 'The View'" on Thursday's edition of the program, co-host Whoopi Goldberg said: "This is really going to piss a lot of you women off and I hope you're going to make your voices heard ...
"We were not happy when we heard that Hustler magazine photo-shopped her into a fake, very explicit photograph that they published in a recent issue," Goldberg continued. "Tell me, when you first saw this picture -- and I mean it's nasty and disgusting and fake, fake, fake, we need to let you all know that -- what was [your reaction?]"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top