The real "war on women"

And I answered your 2 questions, btw - which, as I explained, were under the guise of the new goalposts, which is why I avoided them for a few posts. They had nothing to do w/ the actual discussion.
 
=Onceler;1006759]Well, since you asked:

Goalpost move #1 (your words in quotes): "No distinction in the war on women" - as I clearly explained over about 3-4 posts, which you probably didn't read, the distinction I was talking about was between comedians telling jokes, and politicians setting policy.

thank you for answering. how this a goal post move when you admitted - "Yes, the discussion is under the topic "war on women.""

Goalpost move #2: "since maher is a comedian, his entire show must be comedy. thus, using your logic, franken is a comedian, thus his job as senator is just comedy." - honestly, this one is just insane. I'd love to see what words I wrote to make you construe that this was my 'logic.'

what? how is my statement a goal post move? from what post did i move it from? the logic is sound and proves how stupid you are for claiming maher's whole show is just comedy.

It's all just BS. You're not here to discuss things intelligently; or maybe you are, and just can't.

sadly, nothing you posted was intelligent. it wasn't even true. there was not a single goal post moved. i don't think you realize just how dumb you come across onceler. do even know what a goal post move is?
 
Well, I gave it a shot.

As another poster said, your mind works in...interesting ways. I'm being as charitable as I can be....
 
lol...onceler once again runs away from the tough questions. you can't answer my questions because you're full of shit onceler. i'm not sure you know it. when you started thinking about my response, you quickly realized you had nothing so you ran away with a lame insult.
 
sure it is. you call using your tired old - i'm right because i say so - routine "trying"....only a simple person believes that works. you need to explain your conclusion onceler. my questions conclusively show your conclusions are false. that is why you're going to ignore them, because to answer them, will only prove how dumb you really are.
 
sure it is. you call using your tired old - i'm right because i say so - routine "trying"....only a simple person believes that works. you need to explain your conclusion onceler. my questions conclusively show your conclusions are false. that is why you're going to ignore them, because to answer them, will only prove how dumb you really are.

LOL - you have such delusions about how tough & incisive your questions are. All you really asked is "how is this a goalpost move?"

It's just like before; I answered your other 2 questions, and you basically ignored the answers. You don't really want to hear anything that doesn't fit your worldview, which is essentially "everyone on the board runs away from my brutally tough questions."

You're a real nutter, Yurts.
 
no surprise onceler can't explain how his conclusions are actual goal posts moves. he lacks the mental capacity to substantiate his claims.

his first claim is totally false as he even admits the issue is about the war on women. the second claim is utterly laughable as i never moved from any other position in making the statement about his logic.
 
no surprise onceler can't explain how his conclusions are actual goal posts moves. he lacks the mental capacity to substantiate his claims.

his first claim is totally false as he even admits the issue is about the war on women. the second claim is utterly laughable as i never moved from any other position in making the statement about his logic.

There's something deeply, irrevocably wrong with you.
 
I suppose it's nothing more than OCD intensified by a dollop of narcissism. The OCD can be treated, the narissism is a problem.

I have CDO. Which is like OCD, only the letters are in alphabetical order... AS THEY SHOULD BE!
 
how so? are you another onceler who can't explain your reasons and rely on the simple - i'm right because i said so?

That actually wasn't my reasoning. I thought by clearly juxtaposing what I was actually saying against what you twisted to dishonestly (or insanely, not sure which) claim I was saying would be enlightening for you.

Unfortunately, it just didn't pan out.
 
That actually wasn't my reasoning. I thought by clearly juxtaposing what I was actually saying against what you twisted to dishonestly (or insanely, not sure which) claim I was saying would be enlightening for you.

Unfortunately, it just didn't pan out.

right...that is why you chickened out and ran away from the questions....:rolleyes:

btw...you never gave any reasons for your claim of goal post shifting, you just stated it as fact with zero explanation.
 
right...that is why you chickened out and ran away from the questions....:rolleyes:

btw...you never gave any reasons for your claim of goal post shifting, you just stated it as fact with zero explanation.

You keep saying that. I answered the questions you had - and you ignored the answers.

I think you just like saying "you ran away" to people. It makes you feel almighty or something. I think Darla is quite correct re: the narcissism.
 
As for the word-twisting & goalpost shifting, quite honestly, I thought putting my words against your "interpretation" of my words would be plenty.
 
thank you for answering. how this a goal post move when you admitted - "Yes, the discussion is under the topic "war on women.""



what? how is my statement a goal post move? from what post did i move it from? the logic is sound and proves how stupid you are for claiming maher's whole show is just comedy.



sadly, nothing you posted was intelligent. it wasn't even true. there was not a single goal post moved. i don't think you realize just how dumb you come across onceler. do even know what a goal post move is?

where are the answers onceler? cite the post number you gave the answers.
 
right...that is why you chickened out and ran away from the questions....:rolleyes:

btw...you never gave any reasons for your claim of goal post shifting, you just stated it as fact with zero explanation.



This love affair is getting pretty serious.......and obnoxious...
 
where are the answers onceler? cite the post number you gave the answers.

My bad - I thought you meant the previous 2 "scary" questions you had for me. I answered those; you basically ignored the answers.

Honestly, I don't know how to answer a question like "how is that a goalpost move" when it's right there in black & white. It's like someone giving me an apple, and then asking me how it's not an orange....
 
My bad - I thought you meant the previous 2 "scary" questions you had for me. I answered those; you basically ignored the answers.

Honestly, I don't know how to answer a question like "how is that a goalpost move" when it's right there in black & white. It's like someone giving me an apple, and then asking me how it's not an orange....

how did i ignore the questions by specifically asking you about them? you just can't help but lie..... if it is right there...show it and explain it. you won't because you can't.
 
Back
Top