The real "war on women"
- Thread starter Rationalist
- Start date
I'm going to try this another way Yurt. Here is the post in question:
"I think you're way confused. It isn't a "they do it too!" The OP claims to talk about the "real" war on women, and then proceeded to talk about comedians calling people names.
The "real" war on women has to do with policy. Like I said, it's unsurprising that you can't grasp such a massive distinction."
Now, let me add what the distinction refers to - which most people can tell by reading - in parantheses:
"I think you're way confused. It isn't a "they do it too!" The OP claims to talk about the "real" war on women, and then proceeded to talk about comedians calling people names.
The "real" war on women has to do with policy. Like I said, it's unsurprising that you can't grasp such a massive distinction.(between comedians calling people names and policy)."
Does that help? Are you getting close?
"I think you're way confused. It isn't a "they do it too!" The OP claims to talk about the "real" war on women, and then proceeded to talk about comedians calling people names.
The "real" war on women has to do with policy. Like I said, it's unsurprising that you can't grasp such a massive distinction."
Now, let me add what the distinction refers to - which most people can tell by reading - in parantheses:
"I think you're way confused. It isn't a "they do it too!" The OP claims to talk about the "real" war on women, and then proceeded to talk about comedians calling people names.
The "real" war on women has to do with policy. Like I said, it's unsurprising that you can't grasp such a massive distinction.(between comedians calling people names and policy)."
Does that help? Are you getting close?
Why the limitation to politicans and/or comedians ?.......the war on women, especially conservative women is not waged by only those two.....it is waged by everyone that
supports the liberal agenda and that includes politicians, comedians, actors, cooks, students, teachers, truck drivers and anyone you care to put a label on....
Thats seems to be the only way you can claim to school another poster. Put limits on what or who you mean, change the goalposts or the subject, etc.....
You're a hack.
You think Maher's calling Palin a cunt doesn't qualify as the 'war on women'.....???
Poor Onecell....
Spare me, bravs. Stick to being an intolerant bigot spewing hate about Muslims.
It's when you're at your best.
Gonna have you girl friend, wife, sister, or your little daughter's clit removed Onecell......I know you would stick up for the Muslim practice of mutilation...j
Probably see nothing wrong with stoning or honor killing either......
You're no only a stupid hack, you're also a fool and idiot
FGM is a terrible practice; I devote time to working against it.
But it's practiced by a minority. Your issue is, you take the actions of the few & apply them to all.
Ergo, bigot.
mutilation or female children, stoning, honor killing and Sharia Law in general are widespread and common among the barbarians.....
why do you think that petition is going around for stopping it in the UK......
Honor killing is happening right here in the US and cases were reported in Canada not too long ago....
Its time to get your head out of your anus.....
Poor Onecell....
I read newspapers, try it.....
The KKK was a minority as are the white supremacists and American Nazis, but you
have no problem slamming every Republican and Conservative with the that
bulllshit every chance you get.....why is that ?
So, you don't have stats? Of course not. They'd show your thinking to be as small and hateful as it is.
And no, I don't slam the GOP with "the KKK and Nazis" every chance I get. How ridiculous.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
seriously...were you dropped on your head repeatedly as a child? one more time and this is the last time:
1. tell me onceler....the name calling and policy...what is the description used by some for that? could it be "war on women"?
2. and again...how does my saying "there is no war on women" equal i can't grasp the distinction?
answer the questions or STFU. really.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
lol...you jumped in and have no idea what we're talking about. and he has said he is smart. are you really that dumb?
He knows what I'm talking about. It's actually pretty easy, before it goes through the Yurt "you said I said this" and "this was your logic" crazy-filter.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
i knew you wouldn't answer the questions. you're just not smart enough. now kindly STFU.
1) Yes, the discussion is under the topic "war on women." And?
2) You saying there is "no war on women" doesn't = that you can't grasp the distinction. You can't grasp the distinction because you can't grasp the distinction, as evidenced by your simplistic "they do it too!", one of your 1st responses.
There you go. Now, did you get a chance to read through how I spelled out for you how insanely idiotic you've been?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
so what was all your whining about using war on women in my earlier statement? LOL...what a dumbass
if i claim there is no war, then i would obviously not make a distinction as there are no wars to distinguish. i cannot believe how i have to keep explaining such a simple concept to you.
now, if you want to talk about policy vs. comedians....of course there is a distinction. doesn't mean that someone can't consider both of them wars. you simply just love lying about what people are actually say and you make stuff all the time because you can't read and see only what you want to see. i really hope you can rest easy now. you got really mad over this earlier with your multiple angry posts in a row....LOL.
if i claim there is no war, then i would obviously not make a distinction as there are no wars to distinguish. i cannot believe how i have to keep explaining such a simple concept to you.
now, if you want to talk about policy vs. comedians....of course there is a distinction. doesn't mean that someone can't consider both of them wars. you simply just love lying about what people are actually say and you make stuff all the time because you can't read and see only what you want to see. i really hope you can rest easy now. you got really mad over this earlier with your multiple angry posts in a row....LOL.
Well, I will be honest here - I did get ticked, because I am truly sick of you twisting words & making stuff up, and constantly trying to shift the goalposts of an argument, and then demanding that others answer your questions under the guise of the new goalposts.
I don't know why all of this still bothers me sometimes. It's your m.o. - it's who you are on the board. If you have intelligence or honesty, you don't display it here.
So yeah - the repetitiveness of that, especially when the discussion w/ other posters is good, is frustrating.
I don't know why all of this still bothers me sometimes. It's your m.o. - it's who you are on the board. If you have intelligence or honesty, you don't display it here.
So yeah - the repetitiveness of that, especially when the discussion w/ other posters is good, is frustrating.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
what did i twist and what goal posts did i move?
seriously, you're a liar. you made up what i believed and dug your heels in and ran away constantly from two simple questions. you're a coward onceler.
seriously, you're a liar. you made up what i believed and dug your heels in and ran away constantly from two simple questions. you're a coward onceler.
Well, since you asked:
Goalpost move #1 (your words in quotes): "No distinction in the war on women" - as I clearly explained over about 3-4 posts, which you probably didn't read, the distinction I was talking about was between comedians telling jokes, and politicians setting policy.
Goalpost move #2: "since maher is a comedian, his entire show must be comedy. thus, using your logic, franken is a comedian, thus his job as senator is just comedy." - honestly, this one is just insane. I'd love to see what words I wrote to make you construe that this was my 'logic.'
It's all just BS. You're not here to discuss things intelligently; or maybe you are, and just can't.
Goalpost move #1 (your words in quotes): "No distinction in the war on women" - as I clearly explained over about 3-4 posts, which you probably didn't read, the distinction I was talking about was between comedians telling jokes, and politicians setting policy.
Goalpost move #2: "since maher is a comedian, his entire show must be comedy. thus, using your logic, franken is a comedian, thus his job as senator is just comedy." - honestly, this one is just insane. I'd love to see what words I wrote to make you construe that this was my 'logic.'
It's all just BS. You're not here to discuss things intelligently; or maybe you are, and just can't.