the proof Bush team Knew Iraq had no weapons in 2002

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

You are the one making the allegation. CLearly her rights were NOT violated by his alleged lies. You are just making shit up as you go along.

You cant respond so you ignore or tell me to look it up.

YOU LOOK LIKE A FOOL!

*sigh*

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Jones

According to her story, on May 8, 1991, Paula Jones was escorted to the hotel room of Clinton, then governor of Arkansas, where he crudely propositioned her. She claimed she kept quiet about the incident until 1994, when a David Brock story in American Spectator told a lurid account, sometimes referred to as Troopergate, about an Arkansas employee named "Paula" offering to be Clinton's girlfriend. Jones filed a sexual harassment and eschewal suit against Clinton on May 6, 1994, two days prior to the 3-year statute of limitations.

Clinton and his defense team challenged Jones' ability to bring forward a civil lawsuit against a sitting president for an incident that occurred prior to the defendant becoming president. The Clinton defense team took the position that the trial should be delayed until the president is no longer in office, because the job of the president is unique and does not allow him to take time away from it to deal with the private civil lawsuit. The case wound its way through the courts, eventually reaching the Supreme Court on January 13, 1997. On May 27, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Clinton, and allowed the lawsuit to proceed.

Before the case reached trial, Judge Susan Webber Wright granted President Clinton's motion for summary judgment, ruling that Jones could not show that she had suffered any damages, even if her claim of sexual harassment were otherwise proven. Jones appealed the dismissal to a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, where, at oral argument, two of the three judges on the panel appeared sympathetic to her arguments. On November 13, 1998, Clinton settled with Jones for $850,000, the entire amount of her claim, but without an apology, in exchange for her agreement to drop the appeal. All but $151,000 went to pay, what were by then, considerable legal expenses. Before the end of the entire litigation, her marriage broke apart.

In April 1999, Judge Wright found President Clinton in civil contempt of court for misleading testimony in the Jones case. She ordered Clinton to pay Jones $91,000 for the expenses incurred as the result of Clinton's evasive and misleading answers. Wright then referred Clinton's conduct to the Arkansas Bar for disciplinary action, and on January 19, 2001, the day before President Clinton left the White House, Clinton entered into an agreement with the Arkansas Bar and Independent Counsel Robert Ray under which Clinton consented to a five-year suspension of his law license.

==============================================

Now... How can a "lawyer" possibly ask me, HOW Paula Jones Constitutional rights to due process were violated? The judge awarded her $91,000 precisely BECAUSE her legal Constitutional rights were violated!

 

[Dixie - In Memoriam]

As Jarod said, wrong. Bush had to come up with a sales pitch.

No, he really didn't. Go read your Constitution again! The president certainly has the authority to command the military, in any way he sees fit, at any time. He doesn't have to have your approval or my approval, or even Congress' approval, it is in his presidential authority as commander in chief of the armed forces.

 

[uscitizen]

No, he really didn't. Go read your Constitution again! The president certainly has the authority to command the military, in any way he sees fit, at any time. He doesn't have to have your approval or my approval, or even Congress' approval, it is in his presidential authority as commander in chief of the armed forces.

That same document says congress retains the right to declare war and control any funding for war.
Can't fight a war with no money, now can you....

You really like having a king don't you ?

 

[maineman]

It must be quite painfully sad to see it all slipping away from you, eh Dixie? All the grandeur...all the glory... rose petals at our feet...statues to Bush in great public squares in baghdad.... the democrats in full retreat.... neoconservatism blooming in ascendancy as America's defining policy for the new century....

and now...the whole neocon dream in shambles.....here you are reduced to saying that Bush never lied UNDER OATH....

wow.

I can't imagine how much it must SUCK to be you.

Do you realize that, if civilians were dying in America due to sectarian violence at a rate equal to the rate they are dying in Iraq, that last year, we would have had 350 THOUSAND dead civilians and 400 THOUSAND wounded. Yet you think Iraq is not embroiled in a civil war?

LMFAO

 

[Jarod]

*sigh*

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Jones

According to her story, on May 8, 1991, Paula Jones was escorted to the hotel room of Clinton, then governor of Arkansas, where he crudely propositioned her. She claimed she kept quiet about the incident until 1994, when a David Brock story in American Spectator told a lurid account, sometimes referred to as Troopergate, about an Arkansas employee named "Paula" offering to be Clinton's girlfriend. Jones filed a sexual harassment and eschewal suit against Clinton on May 6, 1994, two days prior to the 3-year statute of limitations.

Clinton and his defense team challenged Jones' ability to bring forward a civil lawsuit against a sitting president for an incident that occurred prior to the defendant becoming president. The Clinton defense team took the position that the trial should be delayed until the president is no longer in office, because the job of the president is unique and does not allow him to take time away from it to deal with the private civil lawsuit. The case wound its way through the courts, eventually reaching the Supreme Court on January 13, 1997. On May 27, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Clinton, and allowed the lawsuit to proceed.

Before the case reached trial, Judge Susan Webber Wright granted President Clinton's motion for summary judgment, ruling that Jones could not show that she had suffered any damages, even if her claim of sexual harassment were otherwise proven. Jones appealed the dismissal to a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, where, at oral argument, two of the three judges on the panel appeared sympathetic to her arguments. On November 13, 1998, Clinton settled with Jones for $850,000, the entire amount of her claim, but without an apology, in exchange for her agreement to drop the appeal. All but $151,000 went to pay, what were by then, considerable legal expenses. Before the end of the entire litigation, her marriage broke apart.

In April 1999, Judge Wright found President Clinton in civil contempt of court for misleading testimony in the Jones case. She ordered Clinton to pay Jones $91,000 for the expenses incurred as the result of Clinton's evasive and misleading answers. Wright then referred Clinton's conduct to the Arkansas Bar for disciplinary action, and on January 19, 2001, the day before President Clinton left the White House, Clinton entered into an agreement with the Arkansas Bar and Independent Counsel Robert Ray under which Clinton consented to a five-year suspension of his law license.

==============================================

Now... How can a "lawyer" possibly ask me, HOW Paula Jones Constitutional rights to due process were violated? The judge awarded her $91,000 precisely BECAUSE her legal Constitutional rights were violated!

Can you not read, the $91,000 was legal fees she incured as a result of the misleading testamony... NOT BECAUSE HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED.

Stop tryint to make things into something more than they are EINSTEIN!

 

[Cancel7]

Honestly, I didn't give a shit about Clinton lying about a BJ either! I think most men would have lied about getting a BJ from their intern who was half their age


Stop your lying. How many times have cons like you berated clinton for wagging his finger at that press conference and denying he had sex? He wasn't "under oath" then - but, I bet you've expressed manufactured outrage for years over that press conference.

And Cons were obsessed with clinton's sex life for years before monica. Do I need to remind you of Gennifer Flowers, and "troopergate"

What's amazing is that these depraved mf's are still whining like little girlie men about "what we had to tell the chilllllldrreeeeen" because Clinton got a blow job, but don't seem to give one rat's ass what their little darlings learn about depraved indifference to human life and dead babies on television. Of course, they are Iraqi babies. So maybe that's what they tell them.

How laughable. And how disgusting that they are even raising children. Bound to grow into the same depraved little fuckers that their parents were.

 

[Jarod]

No, he really didn't. Go read your Constitution again! The president certainly has the authority to command the military, in any way he sees fit, at any time. He doesn't have to have your approval or my approval, or even Congress' approval, it is in his presidential authority as commander in chief of the armed forces.

Are you unaware of the political realities of a president leading us on a pre-emptive strike of a sovrin nation?

 

[Jarod]

Einstein, put your tail between your legs and run, because you have embarrased yourself in this thread!

 

[uscitizen]

Yes Darla, go girl go!
The Abu grabass things were just college pranks compared to a presidential BJ. Go figure....

 

[Cypress]

If he was having a consensual affair, he doesn't owe ME the truth about that -

There is also a matter of ethics here, and I think good ethics are an important attribute for the man we elect to the highest office in the land. Men who cheat on their wives, and more importantly, forsake their vows to God, are not men of very high moral character. Men who are accused of sexual assault on numerous women, to the most extreme degrees, are not generally considered any more than a scoundrel. Liberals think that's cool.

Yes, I can certainly understand lying about getting a blowjob from my barely legal intern, I just don't understand how a man of that character ever managed to be in that position of power. It didn't really bother me that he lied about it, more-so, that he did it to begin with. We might as well have elected Larry Flynt president, if that is the standard of ethics we accept.

Do you remember the phrase... "Character Matters!"?
I think it defines the difference between left and right, the argument over moral character, and moral character issues. To the left, moral character should be a personal judgement for the individual, and none of anyone elses business. To the right, moral character should be defined by society in establishment of acceptable moral boundaries and norms. Interestingly, this is where many Libertarians split to the left.

I didn't fault the sleazebag for lying about sticking his 54-year-old dick in babygirl's mouth... it was expected from his unethical ass. I did not approve of him lying under oath to a grand jury, or lying to me on TV with the finger-wagging denials, but again, I understand why he did. I felt that his actions caused injustice to Paula Jones, and denial of her Constitutional rights as an American, to due process. I felt that this action rose to the level of 'high crimes and misdemeanors' and warranted impeachment, and Congress agreed. I also felt he should have been removed from office, and Congress disagreed. Perhaps it was 'payback' for the Nixon pardon, perhaps it was the droning political rant of 'we must put this behind us and move forward' ...who knows?

The point still remains, it was an issue of character. Moral and ethical character, in the person we elect to the highest office of the land, and how important that actually is. Clinton is the best evidence ever, of how liberals will simply overlook issues of moral and ethical character, as long as he vetos the ban on partial birth!

Take a deep breath, and think about what you're doing.

Minutes after saying you "didn't care" if Clinton got a bj, you launch into a long-winded rant-filled diatribe about a blowjob that happened a decade ago.

Get help dixie. Your obsession with Clinton's penis is freaking me out.

 

[leaningright]

Take a deep breath, and think about what you're doing.

Minutes after saying you "didn't care" if Clinton got a bj, you launch into a long-winded rant-filled diatribe about a blowjob that happened a decade ago.

Get help dixie. Your obsession with Clinton's penis is freaking me out.

OK, that was funny, Cypress.

 

[Jarod]

OK, that was funny, Cypress.

Its not a lot different from his obsession with Bush's blue jeans!

 

[uscitizen]

I think the obsession thing is the key with Dixie.

 

[Jarod]

Remember when he "visited the Green Zone"?

 

[Cancel7]

Take a deep breath, and think about what you're doing.

Minutes after saying you "didn't care" if Clinton got a bj, you launch into a long-winded rant-filled diatribe about a blowjob that happened a decade ago.

Get help dixie. Your obsession with Clinton's penis is freaking me out.

Do you remember how obsessed spider was with Clinton’s penis? I don’t know if you were around when he was there a lot, but he’d always call him “Willie 5 inch Clinton” and then <snicker> and then talk about it having a bend in it? I mean, I didn’t read the Starr report, maybe it does have a bend in it, but it’s weird to be obsessed with it you know? And finally I got so sick of it I had to tell him, look freak, first of all it’s very revealing for a homophobe such as yourself to be obsessed with anyone’s penis and second of all, this snickering at the 5 inches is weird. That’s an average size, and I’m sorry if it’s not enough for you when you’re with a man, but it’s enough for me! And then I said something like, maybe you’ve been around too much, you slut. It was funny.

But they’re really all weirdos, I swear.

 

[Cypress]

Do you remember how obsessed spider was with Clinton’s penis? I don’t know if you were around when he was there a lot, but he’d always call him “Willie 5 inch Clinton” and then <snicker> and then talk about it having a bend in it? I mean, I didn’t read the Starr report, maybe it does have a bend in it, but it’s weird to be obsessed with it you know? And finally I got so sick of it I had to tell him, look freak, first of all it’s very revealing for a homophobe such as yourself to be obsessed with anyone’s penis and second of all, this snickering at the 5 inches is weird. That’s an average size, and I’m sorry if it’s not enough for you when you’re with a man, but it’s enough for me! And then I said something like, maybe you’ve been around too much, you slut. It was funny.

But they’re really all weirdos, I swear.

LOL

Yeah, I remember it. "Blowjob Billy" is the one I most remember. Its astonishing: here we are a decade later, and Cons like Dixie are still writing thousand-word essays on Clinton's blowjob.

Isn't there medication for that kind of homo-erotic obsession with another man's penis?

 

[Cancel7]

LOL

Yeah, I remember it. "Blowjob Billy" is the one I most remember. Its astonishing: here we are a decade later, and Cons like Dixie are still writing thousand-word essays on Clinton's blowjob.

Isn't there medication for that kind of homo-erotic obsession with another man's penis?

Oh, I only wish I was in a right wing male persona, do I ever have an answer for this! But as a lady, I can’t say it.

 

[Lucifer]

Oh, I only wish I was in a right wing male persona, do I ever have an answer for this! But as a lady, I can’t say it.

Well, they could always turn to Jezus. He can cure that sort of thing you know. Trust me.

 

[Jarod]

ALso remember when Jesus gave Dixie financial advice in the shower?

 

[Cancel5]

i don't recall libs getting pissed about clowntoon lying. they were only pissed about him be called on the carpet for it.

I thought it very stupid of him to lie...

I thought it even sillier of the Republicans to pursue this...