The Charlie Kirk Shuffle: false idol

I remember a lot of his debates when he would Bring someone to the microphone who then questioned him about white Privilege.... His first
reply to them would be, is there anything that you can't do that I can? Is there anything that a black person Can't do that a white person can do? You might guess what the answer was from the Individual answering the question...
And then he would be quoted numerous times parroting old racist tropes. What you describe is deflection ... segwaying to another aspect of racial problems to avoid discussion if the original point. What you ignore is how many opponents would not be deterred, a publicly demonstrated Kirk's in ability to defend his rhetoric. THE OP STANDS VALID.
 
I think it was no so much him being openly racist. It is more about him denying systemic racism in the US.
A slight disagreement. Abraham Lincoln was openly racist. He sincerely believed that African-Americans really were inferior even though he also felt slavery was wrong.

The White Christian Nationalist movement, of which Charlie was a major figure, wears a Christian mask to cover their beliefs of white supremacy.

A good metric to use is empathy. The White Christian Nationalist movement lacks the empathy normally associated with Christianity. Ergo, they are White Nationalists first and only give lip-service to being Christian.

Matthew 7:15-20
15 “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves.
16 By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?
17 Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.
18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit.
19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.

20 Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them

a63jz0.jpg
 
Would your rather go to the neurosurgeon that was top in his class or the one that got in through DEI. I would prefer knowing the neurosurgeon got there through merit like Ben Carson did.

Your racism is showing again, Kleagle. What makes you assume that a Black or female or Asian or atheist or Muslim surgeon is unqualified because they aren't a White male? A real "doctor" would know that admitting and surgical privileges can and are revokved by the hospitals if a physician shows incompetence.

Now toddle along and get your white robe ready for tonight's conclave. Scoot!
 
AI Overview
Diversity Recruiting: Importance, Strategies, and Tools ...
Using gender-neutral job descriptions, blind resume screening, diverse interview panels, and skills-focused selection criteria are all effective strategies for creating a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)-focused hiring process that reduces bias and attracts a wider range of candidates. These methods work by standardizing the application and interview process to assess candidates based on their qualifications and potential, rather than demographic information or subjective factors.
Gender-Neutral Job Descriptions
Focus on skills: Write descriptions that emphasize essential skills and responsibilities rather than using unnecessary jargon or exclusionary language that might deter certain candidates.
Promote inclusivity: Use gender-neutral phrasing to appeal to a broader audience and highlight the company's commitment to DEI.
Blind Resume Screening
Remove personal information: Anonymize resumes by removing identifying details like names, addresses, and graduation dates to prevent unconscious bias during the initial screening.
Focus on qualifications: This process allows hiring managers to evaluate candidates based solely on their experience, skills, and qualifications for the role.
Diverse Interview Panels
Ensure varied perspectives: Include a diverse group of interviewers from different backgrounds to bring a wider range of viewpoints to the evaluation process and minimize individual bias.
Promote fair evaluation: Use a diverse panel to ensure a more comprehensive and objective assessment of candidates.
Skills-Focused Selection Criteria
Establish objective criteria: Set clear, objective, and job-related criteria for evaluating all candidates.
Minimize subjective factors: Avoid relying on subjective elements like "culture fit" or personal connections, and instead base decisions on skills, experience, and potential.
Overall Impact
Attract diverse talent: These strategies help to attract a more diverse pool of candidates, ensuring that underrepresented groups have equal opportunities to apply and be considered.
Reduce bias: By standardizing processes and removing personal information, companies can significantly reduce unconscious and conscious biases in hiring.
Improve objectivity: Skills-focused criteria and structured interviews ensure that all candidates are evaluated fairly and consistently. "
And then he would be quoted numerous times parroting old racist tropes. What you describe is deflection ... segwaying to another aspect of racial problems to avoid discussion if the original point. What you ignore is how many opponents would not be deterred, a publicly demonstrated Kirk's in ability to defend his rhetoric. THE OP STANDS VALID.
Not even remotely valid...
 
Only a complete maga/Alt-Right troll would be stupid enough to try to split a hair. Now, supply us with the quote where your hero denounces Christian nationalism (aka being Christo-fascist). We'll wait.
If you were smart enough to know what a secular government is and that the Constitution supports a secular government and not a theocracy you would understand Charlies point of view. But unfortunatly you just aren't that smart.

I agree with Charlie be cause my brand of Christianity isn't the mainstream brand. Any theocratic government in the US probably would not agree with what I believe. I suspect that might lead to religious persecution. Charlie held some of the same beliefs that I do so a theocracy might also persecute him for his beliefs too. In fact my end times beliefs focus on a US government that functions as a theocracy and persecutes the real Christians. I don't know what Charlie thought about end time prophecies. Our SECULAR government should function fairly to everyone and allow everyone to pressure the God of their choice or no God at all. If religion is good it can survive and prosper without the government pushing it. I only ask that the government only stay out of its way.

That said I'm also a Nationalist that believes in a strong successful US first. I always likened it to the airline instructions in the event of depressurization. They ask you to put your O2 mask first before you help others. If the US takes care of itself first then we will have enough to help others too.
 
Your racism is showing again, Kleagle. What makes you assume that a Black or female or Asian or atheist or Muslim surgeon is unqualified because they aren't a White male? A real "doctor" would know that admitting and surgical privileges can and are revokved by the hospitals if a physician shows incompetence.

Now toddle along and get your white robe ready for tonight's conclave. Scoot!
You didn't answer my question Foulwoman. Any nurse worth her salt would know there are some surgeons that are barely adequate and some that are truly gifted. For me and my family I would prefer a truly gifted one. I worked with a Cardio-thoracic surgeon once that we called 007 because he was licensed to kill. I would not have sent my dog to him. If you weren't a Nursing Home LPN you might know that a few people have to have bad outcomes before hospitals revoke privileges for incompetence.

Now go eat a road kill rodent or something.
 
And then he would be quoted numerous times parroting old racist tropes. What you describe is deflection ... segwaying to another aspect of racial problems to avoid discussion if the original point. What you ignore is how many opponents would not be deterred, a publicly demonstrated Kirk's in ability to defend his rhetoric. THE OP STANDS VALID.

Another amusing thing about that post you responded to is that Toxic Top never even heard of Kirk before his death, nor in the 15 years she's followed me around from forum to forum has she ever mentioned him. She knows nothing about him exc. what RW media says. Many of the MAGATs idolizing him now are the same. He's nothing more than another prop for their grievance circus. And for Toxic to post smarmy memes about as she virtue-signals her grief and sorrow for someone who was not even on her radar till he was turned into a martyr by the Reichwing propaganda machine.
 
Back
Top