So you think the SCOTUS is not the final arbiter of defining the constitution
Really?
That stupid fuck thinks he wrote the Constitution.
So you think the SCOTUS is not the final arbiter of defining the constitution
Really?
Did the founders intend for the Republican party to subvert democracy like they are currently doing?
Stay delusional.Ad homs mean I win. Thanks for playing. Right back at ya pal.
If they are for 'use on the battlefield', why the fuck do you need to carry them around with you?
You are confusing the Second Amendment with my right to life...and by extension, my right to defend my life.
LOL you think you're on 'the battlefield'? Talk about delusional.
There was no insult in that post.Insults get you ignored. Bye.
. That’s what it looks like to me too.I accept your concession
There was no insult in that post.
. That’s what it looks like to me too.
Sorry Joe you demented sod.
The 2nd Ammendment is part of the Bill of Rights.
What is it you don't understand about "Shall not be infringed"?
Nor are U.S. Constitutional law, the voting rights of the 14th Amendment and civil rights laws of 1964, all core values of America etc non negotiable among decrepit and gutter internal and external enemies against Democracy of the USofA! Under God! Yet what should also be non negotiable are tactics among tRump and his fellow un America sewer conspiring GOPer's continued drag at waging war against Democracy, nature and the common decency of humanity on Earth .
You mean prisoners who lost all their rights because of their choices?
Yes, no matter the reason, it’s still infringement... right?
you're a moron. i question your law degree and career as a prosecutor
So the bill of rights is negotiable? Those rights can be taken away from you under certain circumstances, right?
They are avoiding these types of questions because it eviscerates the narrative. The Constitution was intentionally overly broad, and the courts were left to interpret that text in specific circumstances. They hate that.
No.Yes, no matter the reason, it’s still infringement... right?
No.
The put their rights on the betting table and lost them when they chose to commit crimes.
No, they voluntarily gave up their rights when they chose to break the law.So the bill of rights is negotiable? Those rights can be taken away from you under certain circumstances, right?
What was that about ad homs, liar?LOL you think you're on 'the battlefield'? Talk about delusional.
Do you at least understand that the Bill of Rights is a set of restriction on government power?Right... they were taken away by the government! These rights can be taken away when the government decides its right to take them.