The Bill of Rights is NOT negotiable.

The founders also built into the system a way for future Americans to amend the constitution


So even they were not originalists
 
the constitution was written to restrict government, not restrict the people.

that's where you fucking statist republicans and democrats are flat wrong
 
SmarterthanYou said:
the constitution was written to restrict government, not restrict the people.

that's where you fucking statist republicans and democrats are flat wrong
Click to expand...

That belief is wrong. It defines the separation of powers that Trump ignored. The founders suggested rewriting the constitution periodically because they knew they could not predict the future. It was in the end rejected, but the assumption that the fathers wanted it enshrined for posterity is incorrect. They agreed to an amendment process because they knew better.
Jefferson suggested every generation should have the solemn opportunity to update it and pass it on til the end of time.
I am sure the second would not have survived that process.
 
Nordberg said:
That belief is wrong. It defines the separation of powers that Trump ignored. The founders suggested rewriting the constitution periodically because they knew they could not predict the future. It was in the end rejected, but the assumption that the fathers wanted it enshrined for posterity is incorrect. They agreed to an amendment process because they knew better.
Jefferson suggested every generation should have the solemn opportunity to update it and pass it on til the end of time.
I am sure the second would not have survived that process.
Click to expand...

You are a completely uneducated idiot. And you prove it every single time you post.
 
Nordberg said:
That belief is wrong. It defines the separation of powers that Trump ignored. The founders suggested rewriting the constitution periodically because they knew they could not predict the future. It was in the end rejected, but the assumption that the fathers wanted it enshrined for posterity is incorrect. They agreed to an amendment process because they knew better.
Jefferson suggested every generation should have the solemn opportunity to update it and pass it on til the end of time.
I am sure the second would not have survived that process.
Click to expand...

not a single word of that drivel you wrote debunks what I stated. the Constitution was written to create the federal government. Prescribe them a set of power that were few and defined. The founder believe that individual rights were paramount. That the federal governments sole purpose was to protect the rights of the individual. where you got the crap you just spewed is.......well, it's just wrong
 
Pretending the founders didn’t intend the living people of this nation to run the show is Russian propaganda


Democracy is not a death pact
 
evince said:
Was there a problem with voter fraud in this nation?
Click to expand...

there might have been 0.001 percent voter fraud............MIGHT. See, YOUR problem is you want to accuse all of those who disagree with you as a 'trumper' who thinks the election was stolen. that's where you end up as nothing but partisan trash................
 
SmarterthanYou said:
there might have been 0.001 percent voter fraud............MIGHT. See, YOUR problem is you want to accuse all of those who disagree with you as a 'trumper' who thinks the election was stolen. that's where you end up as nothing but partisan trash................
Click to expand...


Has the Republican Party cheated in elections?
 
evince said:
Has the Republican Party cheated in elections?
Click to expand...

irrelevant to the topic at hand...........and i'm sure here is where you will fill your sails with the sentiment of winning............because you have to stray from the topic at hand where I was destroying you.............
 
SmarterthanYou said:
irrelevant to the topic at hand...........and i'm sure here is where you will fill your sails with the sentiment of winning............because you have to stray from the topic at hand where I was destroying you.............
Click to expand...

The answer is yes and it’s fully documented


You should hate the Republican Party if you believe in democracy like the founders did
 
Did the founders intend for the Republican party to subvert democracy like they are currently doing?
 
evince said:
The answer is yes and it’s fully documented

You should hate the Republican Party if you believe in democracy like the founders did
Click to expand...

1. the founders did not believe in 'democracy', and when I say that I mean they didn't believe in a majority rules democracy, like YOU do. they believed in a republic where the rights of the minority were protected from the wants of a majority
2. If you had actually paid attention on this forum, instead of the usual left/right hatred and lets see who can say the most sarcastic and hateful things......you'd realize that I actually hate BOTH parties............of course, YOU being a democrat, will likely jump to their defense and call me a right winger or conservative disguised as a Libertarian who lies about voting for trump...........and if that's the case we can be done now
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top