DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Still.TardLibby: *crickets chirping*

Still.TardLibby: *crickets chirping*
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Let me dumb it down for you......if your local hospital has the doctors and facilities that perform abortions, and the hospital is in receipt of State funding of any kind....YOU pay State taxes. If your State receives federal funding for infrastructure, and the same hospital benefits from that....YOU pay Federal taxes.
Are you really that out-of-touch to think that EVERY abortion performed by hospitals and clinics since 1973 were done via private donations? Or maybe you're not aware of what a plethora of other "Pro-lifers" are saying across the country regarding their tax dollars and abortions? Here's a homework assignment for you: do a google search by entering "no tax dollars for abortion"....should be an eye opener for ya! Next time you step up to the plate, bunky.....remember to bring a bat!
????......I fail to see the relevance to the argument......1) you started a thread trying to create a dodge to the anti-abortion position.....2) you made the mistake of thinking the argument was about money.....3) you have been corrected......4) you're left with nothing more than your passion for killing unborn children, which I oppose.....
Y
1) You lie...My opening post was quite clear. I created an option for those who have complained over the years of their tax dollars being used towards facilitating abortions.
2) I didn't create this point of contention....it has at least a 25 year history by anti-abortion activist originating that point of contention. I merely offered a viable option/solution to that particular complaint that for reasons yet to explained has folk like you throwing a hissy fit.
by me....pointing out to you that you have completely missed the true objection to abortion....3) Really? By who? How? To date, people have vented their moral outrage but have yet to logically and factually explain why they won't accept a solution to their complaint.
no, once I again I have pointed out why your arguments are a total waste of time....post #118 does nothing more than demonstrate you are a total fool.....4) Once again, you babble inane propaganda driven slander....a dodge by you to avoid admitting that I schooled you on how tax dollars make their way to hospitals that facilitate abortions, and how the anti-abortion movement has a history of complaints/activism against such. This, along with post #118 pretty much exposes you for the intellectually bankrupt joker that you are.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Y
1) You lie...My opening post was quite clear. I created an option for those who have complained over the years of their tax dollars being used towards facilitating abortions.
Originally Posted by Post Modern Prophet
and tax dollars would still be used to kill children....nothing would change...
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
2) I didn't create this point of contention....it has at least a 25 year history by anti-abortion activist originating that point of contention. I merely offered a viable option/solution to that particular complaint that for reasons yet to explained has folk like you throwing a hissy fit.
Originally Posted by Post Modern Prophet
you personally?....true....but other brain fucked liberals just like you......
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
3) Really? By who? How? To date, people have vented their moral outrage but have yet to logically and factually explain why they won't accept a solution to their complaint.
Originally Posted by Post Modern Prophet
by me....pointing out to you that you have completely missed the true objection to abortion....
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
4) Once again, you babble inane propaganda driven slander....a dodge by you to avoid admitting that I schooled you on how tax dollars make their way to hospitals that facilitate abortions, and how the anti-abortion movement has a history of complaints/activism against such. This, along with post #118 pretty much exposes you for the intellectually bankrupt joker that you are.
Ahhh, but YOU would NOT have YOUR tax dollars used to, in your hyperbole "kill children"
as I have pointed out several times, you are ignorant about our complaints....what we have been saying for years is that it is wrong kill children....that is one of the major complaints that anti-abortionist have used for years
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Ahhh, but YOU would NOT have YOUR tax dollars used to, in your hyperbole "kill children"
so what?....I don't want YOUR tax dollars used to kill children either....
Well bunky, until Roe vs. Wade gets overturned, you're just going to have to muddle through life not getting your way on that one! But by your answer I see that it's really not about you taking any opportunity NOT to enable abortion, but it's about your warped sense of divine righteousness to control others. Get over yourself butch, because you sure as shit don't give a damn about the women in this situation, and you sure as hell cannot supply a home for the tens of thousands of unwanted kids in foster care in America.
that is one of the major complaints that anti-abortionist have used for years
as I have pointed out several times, you are ignorant about our complaints....what we have been saying for years is that it is wrong kill children....
Still.TardLibby: *crickets chirping*
but it's about your warped sense of divine righteousness to control others
it's really not about you taking any opportunity NOT to enable abortion
Most libertarians reject to tax dollars being spent on abortions, regardless of whether they are morally opposed to abortion or not. Don't pretend there isn't a distinction.
Taichiliberal wrote:
but it's about your warped sense of divine righteousness to control others
Taichiliberal wrote:
it's really not about you taking any opportunity NOT to enable abortion
ABORTION IS ALREADY LEGAL
you know, that may be why I am advocating a change, ya think?....I want to make abortion illegal....you want to provide funding for it....perhaps that's why I don't find your idea acceptable.....ya think?......
To whom are you addressing this to?
You said that people who are morally outraged by abortion don't want it federally funded. I pointed out that libertarians oppose funding for a different reason.
BTW, didn't the Hyde Amendment already ban federal funding???
3. You have YET to logically explain WHY you do not find my proposal acceptable.