texas court makes new law out of thin air, negates a right of the people

The author of the Second included a conscientious objector clause. How does that apply to civilians?

and as you are so fond of pointing out that 'inalienable rights' don't exist in the constitution, that conscientious clause doesn't exist in the 2nd............therefore there isn't one.
 
:lolup:

This is going WAY over your head, Jethro.

Where is the “absolute” right to speech, moron?

Another humiliating loss for you. You’re on a roll, “vehicles cannot be necessary”. :rofl2:

you need to make up your mind.........are you going to use the law or the constitution to justify your idiocy. nobody can argue with your stupidity if you're not going to be consistent
 
Ultimately the government does, but we can influence government through elections. Sometimes it works, often it doesn't, but all we can do is keep trying.

Government does not. Government is a necessary evil that should be minimized. The Constitution is that limiting document. BUT, without the right to bear arms, a Government can usurp those rights and institute tyranny which is why we have a second amendment.
 
Pretty much. Which is why it's so important that we don't allow a culture of Fascism to take root in the first place.
And now you know why Batman is punching Trump.

Trump couldn't be further from Fascism. But the leftist ideology is all about Fascism; shutting down speech, shouting down the opposition by methods like race baiting, taking guns away, passing laws from the bench instead of through legislation....etc etc etc.

I do wish you were educated. Really I do.
 
and as you are so fond of pointing out that 'inalienable rights' don't exist in the constitution, that conscientious clause doesn't exist in the 2nd............therefore there isn't one.

You have the attention span of a 3year old. Your post:

“i'm still waiting for any historical documentation from any of the framers or commentators at that time that refer to a well regulated militia as anything but the people with their own arms”.

I just gave you that documentation from the AUTHOR of the 2nd, idiot.

How does a conscientious objector clause apply to all people? It doesn’t, moron. :rofl2:
 
you need to make up your mind.........are you going to use the law or the constitution to justify your idiocy. nobody can argue with your stupidity if you're not going to be consistent

:lolup:

Sad little cretin can’t back up the claim of “absolute” rights.

Are you at a dozen consecutive losses yet? :rofl2:
 
Back
Top