texas court makes new law out of thin air, negates a right of the people

archives said:
Anyone can pretty much find something some Founding Father said to support just about anything one wants, not difficult, especially if you take it out of context and reframe it
Click to expand...

LIE and LAME. The only one's trying to "re-frame" it are loony leftists who don't have the intelligence to comprehend the OBVIOUS. There is no grey area in the second amendment.

archives said:
And the Second Amendment is anything but clear, there's a reason it has been infront of the SCOTUS so often
Click to expand...

The only reason it comes up to the Supreme Court is because loony leftists struggle to comprehend the OBVIOUS. It is perfectly clear what the second means.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
your idiocy is showing again. the constitution limits the government, it does not define our rights, or their limits. that is because our rights are absolute, which is why you see 'SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED'..........so federal gun regulations based on the commerce clause are unconstitutional and should be null and void, but you'd like to see your enemies killed by the government, wouldn't you, traitor?
Click to expand...

I don't know why this is so hard for leftists to comprehend.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Poor Earl. You really should finish fifth grade before trying to discuss things with the adults.
Click to expand...

That's some major IRONY coming from a whiny know-nothing like you snowflake.

ThatOwlWoman said:
“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Click to expand...

the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
 
jimmymccready said:
When I was young a lifetime ago, carrying a long arm or a handgun at your waist in parts of CA or AK or OR or UT, etc., did not cause excitement or alarm.

That is not the case now. The Constitution is a living document that must adapt and govern change in an ever morphing world.
Click to expand...

WRONG! The Constitution is sacrosanct and rights cannot be removed from it at the whim of leftists. It was never intended to be a "living" document but the supreme law of the land that LIMITS what our Government can do.

You should move to Cuba or Venezuela. Perhaps when you get back you would learn to appreciate the importance of the US Constitution.
 
Althea said:
If you're entering a chain restaurant with a long gun strapped to your body, you are doing so because you know it's 'likely to alarm' people who don't share your delusions.
Wanna go hunting? Go hunting.
Click to expand...

The restaurant has the right to refuse service to anyone carrying a long rifle in public. Does it not?
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Poor Earl. You really should finish fifth grade before trying to discuss things with the adults.

“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Click to expand...

i'm still waiting for any historical documentation from any of the framers or commentators at that time that refer to a well regulated militia as anything but the people with their own arms...............do you have some we don't know about?
 
domer76 said:
:lolup::rofl2:

There you go again, idiot, with your “infringed” bullshit.

Write SCOTUS with your legal opinion, dumbfuck. I’m sure they’ll give it all the consideration it deserves. lol
Click to expand...

and as always, FUCK SCOTUS!!!! they no longer rule according to the constitution, but make shit up as they go along. we'll replace them when we restore the republic.
 
jimmymccready said:
When I was young a lifetime ago, carrying a long arm or a handgun at your waist in parts of CA or AK or OR or UT, etc., did not cause excitement or alarm.

That is not the case now. The Constitution is a living document that must adapt and govern change in an ever morphing world.
Click to expand...

the framers disagreed. the government has no authority or power to modify the constitution according to the times or ever morphing world
 
archives said:
Why is it you people can't recognize the fact that Constitutional rights can be regulated, that no right, none, are absolute, ever one can be, and are, regulated, simple fact. Carrying long guns in public can be legally regulated
Click to expand...

Can you show us the Constitutional authority to do this?
 
SmarterthanYou said:
and as always, FUCK SCOTUS!!!! they no longer rule according to the constitution, but make shit up as they go along. we'll replace them when we restore the republic.
Click to expand...

Yeah, FUCK SCOTUS :lolup:

They are established by the Constitution, idiot.

Go ahead and write to them with all your learned legal opinions. I’m sure you’ll be invited to be the 10th justice. :rofl2:
 
CFM said:
Two rights that come into conflict with another in the exercise of them can't both be absolute. That is impossible.
Click to expand...

I would normally find it impossible that someone could be as stupid as you.........but you've proved me wrong. go join your liberal brothers in the 'no right is absolute' crowd
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top