texas court makes new law out of thin air, negates a right of the people

[countryboy]

The second amendment doesn't guarantee rights to all arms. It also doesn't give you the right to interrupt people's peaceful lives, just so you can flaunt your arms. Carrying a long gun doesn't fit the situation anyway. I'd love to see someone try, and do certain tasks lugging something like that along.

With a quality sling, you can perform most tasks. How do you think soldiers get along?

Back so soon? I thought you were on break. How are you feeling? Well, I hope.

 

[CFM]

I would normally find it impossible that someone could be as stupid as you.........but you've proved me wrong. go join your liberal brothers in the 'no right is absolute' crowd

Your responses have proven you don't think any right is absolute.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

If you're entering a chain restaurant with a long gun strapped to your body, you are doing so because you know it's 'likely to alarm' people who don't share your delusions.

Wanna go hunting? Go hunting.

why don't you know all the laws? ignorance of the law is no excuse. there is no law making the carry of long guns illegal, thus it is legal. the commission of a legal act cannot be turned in to a crime, which is what this court is doing.

 

[domer76]

Can you show us the Constitutional authority to do this?

SCOTUS ruling on legislatively approved laws.

You’re a fucking fool.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

The LAW says differently, idiot.

You lose.

laws can be wrong, can they not? looks like you lose, cuckboy

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Can you show us the Constitutional authority to do this?

I asked for this proof as well..............nobody can seem to provide it

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Yeah, FUCK SCOTUS

They are established by the Constitution, idiot.

Go ahead and write to them with all your learned legal opinions. I’m sure you’ll be invited to be the 10th justice.

and when they work outside of the constitution, they are no longer relevant

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Your responses have proven you don't think any right is absolute.

your responses have proven you're a moron of the highest caliber. especially if you think that 'absolute' is defined as being able to take anything you need.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

SCOTUS ruling on legislatively approved laws.

You’re a fucking fool.

that is not proof. try again, cuckboy

 

[domer76]

why don't you know all the laws? ignorance of the law is no excuse. there is no law making the carry of long guns illegal, thus it is legal. the commission of a legal act cannot be turned in to a crime, which is what this court is doing.

Free speech is mentioned in the First. Inciting a riot with that speech is a federal crime.

You lose again, dumbfuck.

(This is SO easy!)

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Free speech is mentioned in the First. Inciting a riot with that speech is a federal crime.

You lose again, dumbfuck.

(This is SO easy!)

is inciting a riot a legal act?

(you make this easier)

you know, if I didn't know any better i'd say that you and CFM are the same idiot fucks trying to be legion

 

[domer76]

laws can be wrong, can they not? looks like you lose, cuckboy

They can. That’s why we have SCOTUS to rule on them.

Another loss for you, fool. They are really piling up today!

 

[countryboy]

I asked for this proof as well..............nobody can seem to provide it

They can't, because it doesn't exist. They will perform their usual Kabuki dance of deflection and obfuscation.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

They can. That’s why we have SCOTUS to rule on them.

and when SCOTUS is wrong???? or are you of the mindset that SCOTUS is never wrong?

Another loss for you, fool. They are really piling up today!

what's going to be funny is watching you tie yourself up in knots trying to justify your idiocy

 

[domer76]

i'm still waiting for any historical documentation from any of the framers or commentators at that time that refer to a well regulated militia as anything but the people with their own arms...............do you have some we don't know about?

The author of the Second included a conscientious objector clause. How does that apply to civilians?

 

[domer76]

and when they work outside of the constitution, they are no longer relevant

Says who, “vehicles cannot be necessary”? A fool of your stature?

 

[domer76]

that is not proof. try again, cuckboy

It sure is proof, dumbfuck. You’re just too stupid to realize it.

 

[StoneByStone]

so you approve of throwing away constitutions in favor of government overlords ruling us?

That's a false dichotomy. The truth is, muh constitution has never protected our rights. We can keep them and continue ignoring them, or we can just throw them away, won't make much of a difference.

 

[domer76]

is inciting a riot a legal act?

(you make this easier)

you know, if I didn't know any better i'd say that you and CFM are the same idiot fucks trying to be legion

This is going WAY over your head, Jethro.

Where is the “absolute” right to speech, moron?

Another humiliating loss for you. You’re on a roll, “vehicles cannot be necessary”.

 

[domer76]

and when SCOTUS is wrong???? or are you of the mindset that SCOTUS is never wrong?



what's going to be funny is watching you tie yourself up in knots trying to justify your idiocy

SCOTUS can always overturn a decision, idiot.

What consecutive loss is this for you this morning? Is it 10 yet?