Tests only identify Zimmerman's DNA on handgun

ekg said:
wow.. intelligence just oozes right out of you doesn't it?



assuming you mean "I don't see you questioning TM behavior or thought process"... I actually did bring up his reaction.. At one point Z said,after being confronted by TM, that he reached into his pocket to get the cell phone he was talking to police on..without knowing who this person was, why couldn't TM have felt Z was reaching for a gun.. He did have a gun, so any 'feeling' TM would have gotten from that initial encounter would have been justified....he really was facing an 'armed' stranger who as following him in a car, now out on the grounds,'reaching for' something in his pocket..

It's when you or anyone would then says "So.. " that it really shows how it's "obvious that you are firmly imbeded in the side" of your football team.. most honest (to use your word) people would concede Z's actions and behaviors were also at fault that night..that had he done this that or the other.. he wouldn't be in this predicament and an unarmed teen wouldn't be dead...


hell if you don't think what Z did would be disconcerting... find a cop and follow him, let him see you following him.. when he parks, get out of your car.. walk up to him and 'reach' into your pocket.. and if he doesn't flinch, you win..

if he shoots.. then I guess we'll have a new football game to comment on...
Click to expand...

Your rant falls apart; because Zimmerman wasn't following a cop.
I know, you just KNOW that Zimmerman is guilty and Saint Martin could do no wrong. :palm:
 
ekg said:
wow.. intelligence just oozes right out of you doesn't it?



assuming you mean "I don't see you questioning TM behavior or thought process"... I actually did bring up his reaction.. At one point Z said,after being confronted by TM, that he reached into his pocket to get the cell phone he was talking to police on..without knowing who this person was, why couldn't TM have felt Z was reaching for a gun.. He did have a gun, so any 'feeling' TM would have gotten from that initial encounter would have been justified....he really was facing an 'armed' stranger who as following him in a car, now out on the grounds,'reaching for' something in his pocket..

It's when you or anyone would then says "So.. " that it really shows how it's "obvious that you are firmly imbeded in the side" of your football team.. most honest (to use your word) people would concede Z's actions and behaviors were also at fault that night..that had he done this that or the other.. he wouldn't be in this predicament and an unarmed teen wouldn't be dead...


hell if you don't think what Z did would be disconcerting... find a cop and follow him, let him see you following him.. when he parks, get out of your car.. walk up to him and 'reach' into your pocket.. and if he doesn't flinch, you win..

if he shoots.. then I guess we'll have a new football game to comment on...
Click to expand...


You have to understand...

The hatred for Liberals is just so ingrained into USF and several others here that they automatically took Zimmerman's side when people first spoke out about the initial lack of law enforcement involved with the case.

His inability to admit he's wrong and a Liberal JUST MIGHT BE RIGHT is what drives USF to continually be such a douchebag, regarding this issue.
 
If you don't think what Z did would be disconcerting... find a Maricopa County resident and follow him, let him see you following him.. when he parks, get out of your car.. walk up to him and 'reach' into your pocket.. and if he doesn't flinch, you win..

if he shoots.. then I guess we'll have a new football game to comment on...
 
ZappasGuitar said:
You have to understand...

The hatred for Liberals is just so ingrained into USF and several others here that they automatically took Zimmerman's side when people first spoke out about the initial lack of law enforcement involved with the case.

His inability to admit he's wrong and a Liberal JUST MIGHT BE RIGHT is what drives USF to continually be such a douchebag, regarding this issue.
Click to expand...

he and a cpl others have a rage inside them that's almost frightening.. But since I assume they're 'safe' because they are still allowed to post here, I try to just ignore the rage and keep the conversation flowing..( I don't always succeed,ha, but I try)

what becomes hard to ignore tho is what you said, the inability to admit a liberal may be right.. For comparison tho,Look at USF's 1st reply to me in this thread, as douchey as one could be, but I still tried out his argument and found out his point was valid.. thus proving myself wrong.. and even more than that, I admitted it.

and guess what?

I didn't burst into flames or involuntarily flip political parties after admitting it either..

But after he continued to attack, I realized I'll never get the same consideration from him.. he'd never actually try a 'theory' and admit he was wrong.. he'll never actually read an article and admit I was right.. no, instead he'd tell me to stick a thumb up my ass..

message boards are geared towards having your opinion and sticking to it.. rarely is there an opportunity to change someone's mind on an issue... the fact that he had every op in the world to change mine, but chose instead to attack me.. showed a weakness on his 'zimmerman's innocent' side.. one shouldn't have to attack people and their questions if they're right.. it's when they're afraid they're wrong that the questions bother them.. the irony is that line of attack from the USF's of the worldm just solidify 'my' opinion that Z did do wrong that night.. I mean, if he (Z) can't be questioned, if concession can't be made.. you have to ask yourself... why?

I know you've been here for ages and have had a go-around with many on the (R) side.. I've seen some of them. LOL. I've only run into >handful that have been so exquisitely attacking,rude,mean and uncompromising.. OTOH, Jmac was one who was rather civil and superfreak earlier in this thread was another who was civil.. but USF, Facts, Dixie and 1 or 2 others.. make me wonder why I spend any time here at all. If I wanted to just argue with uncompromising,low-brow idiots I'd go to breitbart's site.. ;)

But I crave conversation with my 'equals but opposites'..so for now, I'm still optimistic that I'll find more people like the two positives ones I mentioned and less of the others..
343922.gif
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I think it's high time that we mere citizens were afforded our own version of the 'Garrity' rule.

http://www.njlawman.com/Garrity.htm

By invoking the Garrity rule, the officer is invoking his or her right against self incrimination. Any statements made after invoking Garrity, may only be used for department investigation purposes and not for criminal prosecution purposes. The Garrity Rule stems from the court case Garrity v. New Jersey, 385 U.S. 493 (1967), which was decided in 1966 by the United States Supreme Court. It was a traffic ticket fixing case of all things.

Officers were advised that they had to answer questions subjecting them to criminal prosecution or lose their jobs. The Court held that this was Unconstitutional.
Click to expand...

This source link is inactive. Here is the correct replacement.
 
Trevon (sp?) was walking around while black and Zimmerman assumed he was a criminal and shot him. Travon had committed no crime at all. It was all Zimmerman's fault.
THat guy should be on death row right now. End of story.
 
Micawber said:
Trevon (sp?) was walking around while black and Zimmerman assumed he was a criminal and shot him. Travon had committed no crime at all. It was all Zimmerman's fault.
THat guy should be on death row right now. End of story.
Click to expand...

The jury disagreed. That's all that matters. A thug isn't around to grow up and live a criminal life any more. Keep whining about it 5 years later.
 
Saint Zimmerman has long been exonerated. He killed that punk in self defense, and the world is a better place now.
 
CFM said:
They equate disagreement and something being wrong. They can't understand how if they believe something is a certain way it simply isn't that way because they believe it to be.
Click to expand...

They grew up with participation trophies.
 
Micawber said:
Trevon (sp?) was walking around while black and Zimmerman assumed he was a criminal and shot him. Travon had committed no crime at all. It was all Zimmerman's fault.
THat guy should be on death row right now. End of story.
Click to expand...

Untrue; because Zimmerman was found not guilty, Trayvon is still dead, and that's the true end of the story.

:dealwithit:
 
hilarious thread bump.

Pretty interesting to see me (as usual) methodically breaking down the case while the dopey peanut gallery and usual suspects call me a troll. It's pretty awesome to see how everything I was saying in this thread would eventually be brought up at trial and I would be vindicated in less than a year. Nothing has really changed here.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Untrue; because Zimmerman was found not guilty, Trayvon is still dead, and that's the true end of the story.

:dealwithit:
Click to expand...

Why is it lefties demand the rest of us acknowledge and accept court cases when found in their favor yet refuse to do so when they aren't?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top