zimmerman is innocent and trayvon martin deserved to be killed. I can't wait for the day when zimmerman is rightfully acquitted.
do you listen to yourself talk? how about he smashes his head, then in a brief moment goes for the gun. Is that such an impossible concept for you to comprehend? or are you really that stupid?
LMAO... you are reading into it what you want... as I stated, you are making an assumption. But I will play your game... One hand over the mouth/nose could also be the one slamming his head into the ground. The other is then free to grab for the gun. Again... just playing your little game.
You just aren't very bright are you? I don't mind assumptions. What I do mind is when someone tries to pretend their assumptions are facts. Which is what you are doing.
Your ignorance is your problem.
do you listen to yourself talk? how about he smashes his head, then in a brief moment goes for the gun. Is that such an impossible concept for you to comprehend? or are you really that stupid?
zimmerman is innocent and trayvon martin deserved to be killed. I can't wait for the day when zimmerman is rightfully acquitted.
as far as I know, zimmerman never said trayvon grabbed his gun.
he said trayvon went for his gun.
although self evident for people like us, simple sentences like this will still fly over the heads of those that support violent people like trayvon martin.
You are hilarious, I wonder at times if you really believe half the stuff you write.
do you listen to yourself talk? how about he smashes his head, then in a brief moment goes for the gun. Is that such an impossible concept for you to comprehend? or are you really that stupid?
You notice that as soon as I started shooting holes in their convoluted theories, they both begin with the standard issue derision.
It is hilarious to watch! Zimmerman's stories, have more holes than cheese clothe!
as far as I know, zimmerman never said trayvon grabbed his gun.
he said trayvon went for his gun.
BAC... how does this blow a hole in his story?
According to the above, Zimmerman stated that it was he that pulled the gun from the holster. The tests were inconclusive as to DNA on the holster for Martin. Plus, the DNA said that Martin's DNA was not on the grip. If Martin was on top, the most likely place to grab the gun would be near the trigger or barrel... not the grip. (Unless the gun was at a weird angle).
I do not think they are going to be able to get 2nd degree murder charges to stick. The DA over shot and I think he will walk as a result. Manslaughter would have been better suited in my opinion. .
I don't see how that doesn't fit in with Zimmerman's story. Nothing there says that Trayvon ever touched the gun.
It is hilarious to watch! Zimmerman's stories, have more holes than cheese clothe!
Osterman quotes Zimmerman as saying.
“For a brief moment I had control of the wrist, but I knew when he felt the sidearm at my waist with his leg. He took his hand that was covering my nose and went for the gun, saying, “You’re gonna die now, motherf-----.’ Somehow, I broke his grip on the gun where the guy grabbed it between the rear sight and the hammer. I got the gun in my hand, raised it toward the guy’s chest and pulled the trigger.”
DNA reports released Wednesday showed there was no DNA from Trayvon on the gun."
I dont know, he's always sounded pretty consistent to me. You simply make up bullshit he never said and then pretend it's another one of his stories. Zimmerman NEVER has said that trayvon grabbed his gun. I have asked for people to show me this, but no one has. He said trayvon went for it, which is entirely different than actually getting it.
I don't see how that doesn't fit in with Zimmerman's story. Nothing there says that Trayvon ever touched the gun.