You see...why do you people that hate EV's make up this shit?
No offense, but you clearly have NO IDEA what you are talking about on this and just are guessing.
No, he knows what he is talking about and is not guessing.
How POSSIBLY could an electric motor need more maintenance than an ICE (internal combustion engine).
Easy. It's a moving part.
How much maintenance have you EVER done on ANY electric motor in ANY appliance you have ever had?
Me? A fair amount. Mostly fixing a wiring problem, cleaning, or changing out starting capacitors. I've had to replace just about every electric motor at one time or another on aircraft.
Even the bloody GM website says that their Chevy Bolt EV requires less maintenance.
You believe the sales pitch, eh?
And batteries need maintenance?
Where did you get that one?
Yes. Batteries need maintenance.
Does you phone battery need maintenance?
I have NEVER heard of a phone battery, EVER needing maintenance.
Not the same battery.
And they are the EXACT, same type of battery in most EV's (Lithium Ion).
Nope. Not the same battery.
In fact, ALL a Tesla battery pack is, is hundreds of tiny, 'AA' battery-shaped Lithium Ion batteries - attached together.
https://www.ctvnews.ca/autos/tesla-batteries-better-than-expected-1.3888199
Look on YouTube?
Any schmuck with even tiny, electrical knowledge can build a car/bicycle battery.
Battery packs pushing heavy currents used in EVs MUST be cooled. Many EVs use liquid coolant for that, which must be changed from time to time. Building a battery does not require electrical knowledge. It requires chemistry and engineering knowledge.
They are relatively simple.
No, they are not.
First, you must obtain the materials, primarily lithium and cobalt, both hard to get, and both use strip mining to get it. You will also need aluminum, also strip mined, but fortunately more available.
There is very limited supply of lithium and especially of cobalt. As more EVs get build, supply will not meet demand, meaning costs go way up, and the price of the car correspondingly so.
Then you have to smelt the lithium to lithium metal. This metal is highly reactive, so you have to do this under carefully controlled conditions. These conditions MUST be maintained during battery manufacture. Once manufactured, the metal is protected by a plastic and aluminum wrapping.
Then you have to assemble them into packs. They MUST be reasonably matched to work in a pack. That means each and every one of them MUST be tested for internal resistance and charge characteristics. Today, this is automated in some plants, but it must be done.
Once the pack is assembled, you have a potentially dangerous incendiary on your hands. You MUST install protective guards when handling the thing and installing in the vehicle. These are heavy packs too, requiring special equipment to lift and mount them. They are the bulk of the weight of the car, which is a fair bit heavier than an ICE vehicle of the same size.
Charging them is tricky. They can only charge so fast. Any faster and the batteries are destroyed. They can only discharge so fast. Any faster and the batteries are destroyed. Destruction usually takes the form of catching fire. Such a fire is a class C fire. You can't put it out with water. Most fire departments are ill equipped for large class C fires. They usually just let the thing burn, and put out any fires it starts by doing so.
Besides, EV manufacturers include HUGE, battery warranties.
Chevy's is 8 years.
Do you really think they would offer that if it was going to cost them a bundle to service the battery?
It IS costing them.
It IS costing them.
And electronics?
Electronics have no moving parts.
Motors are a moving part. So are relays, controls, etc. Connectors are also major points of failure. Overheating of electronics, particularly displays, is also a problem. Wiring will also chafe under the vibration sustained by the vehicle. As wiring ages, insulation becomes brittle and cracks, and corrosion is always a problem.
How much maintenance have you done on your PC/laptops/smartphones?
A fair amount. I keep my PC up to date, even replacing it from time to time as POST software becomes unable to cope with my needs.
I have never done ANY.
And most of them work fine.
Even one's that are 10 years old.
So you run outdated machines. Meh.
I have my first iPhone 3GS I bought in 2009 and I still use it for a clock for sleeping.
It works fine.
'The correct answer is that you don’t need to do anything to maintain your electric vehicles’ main motor and electric drivetrain. Nowadays, electric motors are so reliable that your EVs other components will fail first before the motor. Even every internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicle comes with a starter motor that never fails.
You're still on 3GS????!!? You DO realize, don't you, that 3GS carriers are in the process of shutting down?
Any motor can fail, even a brand new one. You are dreaming.
EV motors run hot. They MUST be cooled. Oil is used for lubrication and as a coolant. It must be changed from time to time (though not as often as ICE engine oil, more like ICE transmission oil). In addition, the gearing in some electric cars also require lubricant which much be changed from time to time. Further, battery coolant is often liquid coolant, which must be changed from time to time, or corrosion will set in and possibly cause a fire.
The motor and electric drive units have lubricating oil.
Which much be changed. This oil is also used for cooling the motor, using a radiator.
However, almost all EVs do not require to change this lubricating oil for its lifetime.
An outright lie.
For example, the motor of any Tesla cars — Model 3, Model S, Model X — do not need to replace the motor lubricating oil.'
Yes they do. Not maintaining your motors will cause that motor to fail.
And ask ANYONE who runs an auto parts store.
They HATE EV's because they need such tiny amounts of maintenance.
Yes they do. They body must be maintained like any car. So do the tires and brakes. Newer cars such as the EV you lease require little engine maintenance.
'As a rough estimate, electric vehicles have about 1/10th of the ongoing requirement for repair and replacement parts.'
Making up numbers isn't helping you. The cost of replacing a battery (it will become necessary at some point) on a Tesla is currently about $20,000; just for the PART, then you pay more for the schmuck to put it in. It requires a special shop set up for this procedure as well.
https://seekingalpha.com/article/4177868-evs-disrupt-retail-auto-parts
The EV1 came about because of California's proposed zero emission law.
PERIOD.
And it failed. Auto parts stores don't sell dealer parts. You have to go to the dealer for practically every bit of of maintenance (other than body and tire maintenance) for an electric car. EXPENSIVE!
'The decision to mass-produce an electric car came after GM received a favorable reception for its 1990 Impact electric concept car, upon which the design of the EV1 drew heavily. Inspired partly by the Impact's perceived potential for success, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) subsequently[when?] passed a mandate that made the production and sale of zero-emissions vehicles (ZEV) a requirement for the seven major automakers selling cars in the United States to continue to market their vehicles in California.'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Motors_EV1#Costs
Wagoner is full of it.
GM had NO CHOICE.
They HAD to build an EV for California (their biggest market).
But later...California backed off from the law, and GM was off the hook.
The SDTC is NOT the largest market for vehicles. Your arrogance is astounding.
GM HATED EV's because they have such tiny maintenance requirements and they last so long....this hurts their dealer networks as up to 50% of all profits for these businesses comes from parts and service.
Wagoner was lying to cover up the fact that ALL major manufacturers HATE EV's because they have such low maintenance costs.
Plus, it is very difficult for manufacturers to make money on EV's.
Especially way back then.
Tesla NEVER posted a yearly profit for the first 13 years.
Why the fuck would GM destroy every EV1 they could get their hands on?
RQAA. Because the car only had a range of about 100 miles, and the batteries were dangerous as they aged more and more, and the cost to GM to maintain the things became prohibitive.
And refused to let the owners keep theirs, once the leases ran out?
The answer is obvious - they did NOT want people to get used to EV's low maintenance/operating costs.
HIGH maintenance costs. That's what killed the EV1.
You seem like a relatively, level-headed guy.
Do yourself a favor and do not guess about something you do not understand.
Nah. That would be YOU. You comparing a new car to an old car, dealer parts and maintenance to third party sources, have never repaired much of anything in your life so you don't appreciate just what it takes to build and maintain anything, have almost zero knowledge of chemistry and electricity (as demonstrated by not understanding battery technology or electrical and electronic engineering and maintenance).
EV's cost far, FAR less to use and maintain than ICE's.
But they are expensive to buy.
You are making up numbers. You are also failing to account for costs. Argument from randU fallacy.