Terrible news for the Creation Science museum (and Republicans)

Buckly J. Ewer said:
You poor stupid fuck...
The word you chose for your illustration only further displays you utter ignorance.
The machine "crane" is taken from the bird "crane" because the moving boom of the machine resembles the animal's long and maneuverable neck
Camera boom and fireplace hook are similar derivations from their similar movement to the birds neck.
To "crane" one's neck means to move one's neck out from the vertical in a searching gesture similar to the bird's hunting movements.
The bird came first and all meanings of the word "crane" come from the animal.
The word "agnostic" means"without knowledge", regardless of its context or use it still references the original meaning ; "not knowing" in any application.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crane_(machine)

There are words that spell the same and come from completely different origins and mean completely different things, but you are too fucking stupid to find one.

You are too stupid to defend your own ignorance...
LMFAO
Click to expand...

So? lol

Time for me to get the hose out and wash what's left of you down the storm drain...
 
Milagro said:
He is just an cock-gobbling arse badger!
Click to expand...

I'm going to consider this a cry for help.

All I have ever done is own you on Climate Denial and Islamophobia. I do not think I have even written more than 50 comments to you in the past decade, and I do not believe I have ever stooped to vulgarity and obscenity towards you.

You are putting in a poor showing for our British cousins, mate. I leave you to your insipid rants. Carry on.
 
domer76 said:
Who here believes a guy was born of a virgin mother, was killed and came back to life in a couple of days? lol
Click to expand...

We know you weren't born of a virgin mother. She was the neighborhood doorknob. Everyone had their turn. That's why you don't know which sperm donor is your baby daddy. Your mother doesn't even know.
 
Cypress said:
Oldest Homo sapiens fossils ever found push humanity's birth back to 300,000 years

Digging on a hilltop in the Sahara Desert, scientists have found the most ancient known members of our own species, undermining longstanding ideas about the origins of humanity.

The newfound Homo sapiens fossils — three young adults, one adolescent and a child of 7 or 8 — date back roughly 300,000 years, says a study in this week’s Nature. The next-oldest fossils of Homo sapiens, the scientific name for humans, are about 200,000 years old.

The 200,000-year-old fossils were found in eastern Africa, sometimes called the “Garden of Eden” for its supposedly pivotal role as the birthplace of humanity. But the new fossils are from Morocco in far northern Africa, supporting the theory that the evolution of modern humans was a piecemeal affair that played out across the continent.

“There is no Garden of Eden in Africa,” said Jean-Jacques Hublin, co-author of two new studies describing the fossils and a paleontologist at Germany’s Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. “Or if there is a Garden of Eden, it’s … the size of Africa.”

The new finds confirm “modern humans do not suddenly appear like the Big Bang, with all the bells and whistles that we associate with modern humans,” agrees paleoanthropologist Bernard Wood of George Washington University, who was not associated with the study.

Continued

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/scie...manitys-birth-back-to-300000-years/ar-BBCfiN0


evolution_poll.jpg
Click to expand...

This thread seems out of character assuming I am supposedly a bible thumping, fundamentalist Christian apologist.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top