Terrible news for the Creation Science museum (and Republicans)

Buckly J. Ewer said:
WTF?

You have an "alternative dictionary", that supports your magical thinking precepts about your own language?
What a stupid fuck you are, FRight...
Stupid and frightened...
The magic formula for blind religious faith.
LMFAO
Click to expand...

lol Merriam Webster is a "magic dictionary"? lol

Because I like to beat down an asshole like you to a stain on the pavement, here it is again, the definition that Carlon obviously used in bold.

Definition of agnostic
1: a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (such as God) is unknown and probably unknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god
2: a person who is unwilling to commit to an opinion about something political agnostics
Click to expand...
 
Right said:
lol Merriam Webster is a "magic dictionary"? lol

Because I like to beat down an asshole like you to a stain on the pavement, here it is again, the definition that Carlon obviously used in bold.
Click to expand...

First time I heard that one. Like it!
 
Amadeus said:
This involves breaking down Brahman into component gods (or divas). The Trimurti in Hinduism involves Brahma (Creator), Vishnu (Preserver) and Shiva (Destroyer). These beings are all infinitely powerful. Shiva alone can break the cosmos with his footsteps, and actually destroys the universe in order to complete a cycle (measured in trillions of years). These beings and all of reality combined are called Brahman (not to be confused with Brahma), which has the following description:
Click to expand...
we have another Hindu member - are you a Hindu or a theologian? both?

Yery good!
 
Right said:
lol Merriam Webster is a "magic dictionary"? lol

Because I like to beat down an asshole like you to a stain on the pavement, here it is again, the definition that Carlon obviously used in bold.
Click to expand...

Def.2 refers back to def.1 not enough known to commit to an opinion.
A person unwilling to commit with knowledge, would not need, or want, to use the word agnostic.
"Uncommitted" would suffice.
Agnostic still means "without knowledge", no matter the application or context.
Carlson admitted to, not knowing, when he chose to use the word.

The pavement is still dry and clean, asshole.
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
Def.2 refers back to def.1 not enough known to commit to an opinion.
A person unwilling to commit with knowledge, would not need, or want, to use the word agnostic.
"Uncommitted" would suffice.
Agnostic still means "without knowledge", no matter the application or context.
Carlson admitted to, not knowing, when he chose to use the word.

The pavement is still dry and clean, asshole.
Click to expand...

No it doesn't. Each numbered definition is completely independent of the others. Example:

Definition of crane
1: any of a family (Gruidae of the order Gruiformes) of tall wading birds superficially resembling the herons but structurally more nearly related to the rails
2: any of several herons
3: an often horizontal projection swinging about a vertical axis: such as
a : a machine for raising, shifting, and lowering heavy weights by means of a projecting swinging arm or with the hoisting apparatus supported on an overhead track
b : an iron arm in a fireplace for supporting kettles
c : a boom for holding a motion-picture or television camera
Click to expand...

m-w.com

The pavement is heavily stained but with some chunks left. lol
 
PostmodernProphet said:
????......no it doesn't......it merely confirms it had already happened 300k years ago......
Click to expand...

Reading comprehension and scientific literacy not your strong points, eh?

I can't waste too much time dumbing it down for you, but this evidence shows that humans did not spontaneously originate in one location, thus ruling out a mythical garden of Eden.

Secondly, you appear to be confused about the nature and timeline of human evolution. Our species, homo sapiens, did not just magically appear 300,000 years ago. We evolved and descended from earlier anatomically similar primates in our genus - thus our DNA has a lineage that can be traced back several million years to our earliest ancestors.

There's not much room for a Garden of Eden in that, either.

But you can believe whatever you want. I am not concerned that you will ever be in a position that our society will need you to make decisions based on scientific knowledge and understanding.
 
Right said:
No it doesn't. Each numbered definition is completely independent of the others. Example:



m-w.com

The pavement is heavily stained but with some chunks left. lol
Click to expand...

You poor stupid fuck...
The word you chose for your illustration only further displays you utter ignorance.
The machine "crane" is taken from the bird "crane" because the moving boom of the machine resembles the animal's long and maneuverable neck
Camera boom and fireplace hook are similar derivations from their similar movement to the birds neck.
To "crane" one's neck means to move one's neck out from the vertical in a searching gesture similar to the bird's hunting movements.
The bird came first and all meanings of the word "crane" come from the animal.
The word "agnostic" means"without knowledge", regardless of its context or use it still references the original meaning ; "not knowing" in any application.

Cranes were so called from the resemblance to the long neck of the bird, cf. Ancient Greek: γέρανος, French grue.[1]
Click to expand...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crane_(machine)

There are words that spell the same and come from completely different origins and mean completely different things, but you are too fucking stupid to find one.

You are too stupid to defend your own ignorance...
LMFAO
 
Last edited:
Amadeus said:
This involves breaking down Brahman into component gods (or divas). The Trimurti in Hinduism involves Brahma (Creator), Vishnu (Preserver) and Shiva (Destroyer). These beings are all infinitely powerful. Shiva alone can break the cosmos with his footsteps, and actually destroys the universe in order to complete a cycle (measured in trillions of years). These beings and all of reality combined are called Brahman (not to be confused with Brahma), which has the following description:
Click to expand...

not seeing your iron chariots.....
 
Cypress said:
but this evidence shows that humans did not spontaneously originate in one location
Click to expand...

how do you conclude that a fossil found in one location proves humans didn't originate in one location?.....

Our species, homo sapiens, did not just magically appear 300,000 years ago.
Click to expand...

agreed.....they were created when they were created.....no magic involved......

There's not much room for a Garden of Eden in that, either.
Click to expand...

how so......do you figure Adam and Eve were only in the garden for six weeks?.......is that because Chapter 2 and Chapter 3 are only a page apart?.......

But you can believe whatever you want.
Click to expand...

thank you......that's very gracious of you......
 
I wonder if homo sapians could have walked from Morocco to Eastern Africa if they had a hundred thousand years to do it.......or vise versa.....

like maybe a hundred thousand times?.....
 
anatta said:
we have another Hindu member - are you a Hindu or a theologian? both?

Yery good!
Click to expand...

I am fascinated by religion, especially Buddhism, Hinduism, and the Shinto-Buddhism amalgam of Japan. Casually study other religions, including Haitian Vodou (which could arguably considered a syncretic variant of Christianity, as the Loa spirits are agents of the Abrahamic God).
 
Amadeus said:
I am fascinated by religion, especially Buddhism, Hinduism, and the Shinto-Buddhism amalgam of Japan. Casually study other religions, including Haitian Vodou (which could arguably considered a syncretic variant of Christianity, as the Loa spirits are agents of the Abrahamic God).
Click to expand...

lol.....
 
All religion is borne out of ignorance, fear and an unwillingness to grasp the reality of ones own mortality.
Mix that with a good healthy dose of leaders willing to try anything to get the masses under their control and there you have the world's religions.
As diverse as they appear on the surface, all religions come from the same source of human frailties weaknesses and fears...
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
All religion is borne out of ignorance, fear and an unwillingness to grasp the reality of ones own mortality.
Mix that with a good healthy dose of leaders willing to try anything to get the masses under their control and there you have the world's religions.
As diverse as they appear on the surface, all religions come from the same source of human frailties weaknesses and fears...
Click to expand...

In one post you claim to not be able to know.

In the next post you claim to know.
 
GazzaQueen said:
In one post you claim to not be able to know.

In the next post you claim to know.
Click to expand...

Never claimed agnosticism, pal...
That was bewildered and somewhat cross eyed Tucker Carlson, claiming ignorance on global warming.
He should have stuck with plaid jackets and bow ties, it fit his tragic, clownish personality better.

I know all religion is pure bullshit ...
I am a well established and convinced atheist without apologies.
 
Buckly J. Ewer said:
Never claimed agnosticism, pal...
That was bewildered and somewhat cross eyed Tucker Carlson, claiming ignorance on global warming.
He should have stuck with plaid jackets and bow ties, it fit his tragic, clownish personality better.

I know all religion is pure bullshit ...
I am a well established and convinced atheist without apologies.
Click to expand...

Eeruh atheism covers many beliefs, lady. Even religious ones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top