PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I have a solution.....what if Russia agreed to take possession of his WMD stockpiles.....
do we have the necessary missiles following sequestration?..........
we are NOT partaking in a war.
we are bombing the delivery system of a country that has proven it will gas its own people to retain control of a dictatorship.
listen to your self
why did you believe Bush lies but refuse to believe the truth now?
we are NOT partaking in a war.
we are bombing the delivery system of a country that has proven it will gas its own people to retain control of a dictatorship.
listen to your self
I think the only real question we should ask is How many threads on Syria will Gerud start?
And the answer is, as many as I choose!
it was reported world wide that emergency care givers were dying from secondary exposure by treating patients
why did you believe Bush lies but refuse to believe the truth now?
And the answer is, as many as I choose!
I love how it gets your panties all bunched in a wad!thanks for confirmation that you are indeed a fucking idiot.
It does not appear to me that we are taking sides, in this instance, other than to back up a threat we have made for decades.
The fallacy of your argument brother. The US is indeed and of course taking sides in this.
If you don't have the ability to recognize that obvious truth, you don't have the ability to recognize truth at all on this issue.
Obama did the same thing in Libya .. and ooops, regime change happened.
LOL.
Are you denying that if Romney were president and pursuing these actions, the libs would be screaming about innocent lives that will be lost due to bombing?
Guess SF is against freedom of speech.
There are a lot of dud threads being created but not by you.
Jarod is so retarded he creates 10-25 threads on teh same topic, posting the same retarded statements over and over and over again. Life is so much better with him on ignore.
The United States has been blessed with AWSOME military power and with it the ability to affect the outcome of battles and wars worldwide. In most cases we generally choose not to do so, but we have said in the past that there are certain things we choose not to allow.
The question currently before Congress is IF the United States will back up the Red Line about the use of chemical weapons we have blustered about for decades. We have the ability to make the use of chemical weapons a net loss for any group planning on using them in the future. If we hit the Syrian regime for using the chemical weapons any group in the future that considers using chemical weapons will have to weigh in the risk that the United States will cause more harm than benefit the Chemical Weapons will have provided. It does not appear to me that we are taking sides, in this instance, other than to back up a threat we have made for decades. If the rebels had used Chemical Weapons I would hope we would be considering hitting them.
So will the Congress allow politics to weaken a stance taken by both parties for decades or will they stand with the Current President in such a time?