You're a lawyer who opines on events you are completely--deliberately--ignorant about.
so why dont you tell us the case history, the relevant issues involved and the likely outcome -and why?
Or hold your powder until it becomes clear
You're a lawyer who opines on events you are completely--deliberately--ignorant about.
so why dont you tell us the case history, the relevant issues involved and the likely outcome -and why?
Or hold your powder until it becomes clear
I did. it's all kind of competing interests, split decisions,amicus briefs and allegation Kennedy changed his story.Why don't you read the goddam story I posted, you bullshitting buffoon.
I did. it's all kind of competing interests, split decisions,amicus briefs and allegation Kennedy changed his story.
So the sane thing to do is listen to the orals - especaily since you show no ability to understand
even the outline of the appeal
I will never understand what football has to do with religion. You are asking God to smote your enemies?!
It will be very interesting to me if these conservative judges believe in a living changing constitution when faced with a conservative cause that would require it.
but does the kid have the right to do so? is the questionAs the colorful Al McGuire used to comment when he saw a kid make the sign of the cross before a foul shot, "I think God has more important things to do than interfere in a basketball game"
As the colorful Al McGuire used to comment when he saw a kid make the sign of the cross before a foul shot, "I think God has more important things to do than interfere in a basketball game"
nobody really knows. there is a cornucopia of issues to settle - so a narrow ruling might not be possibleYou are right, puts them in a bit of a bind, guarantee they will come out with some nebulous ruling that doesn't resolve anything but gives the right wing media enough content to frame the decision as a victory
And this is nothing compared to the guns and abortion decisions due out in June
a group of Satanists demanded equal access to the field.
but does the kid have the right to do so? is the question
It's like going to war and praying for victory, while the other side does the same
"who is on God's side") ( salafist jihadi will justify Allah to kill even)
God doesn't intervene in human affairs,but humans of faith still pray -even at football games
ya i know..i was simply responding to your post.This case involves a bit more than some kid making the sign of the cross prior to a foul shot
"Kennedy began giving motivational speeches that included prayer and religious content. Kennedy alleged that he never required or asked any student to pray or participate in any religious activity. School principal John Polm later testified that a parent complained about the prayers, stating that his son felt compelled to participate or risk losing playing time during games (https://ballotpedia.org/Kennedy_v._Bremerton_School_District)
nobody really knows. there is a cornucopia of issues to settle - so a narrow ruling might not be possible
maybe i heard the same thing about abortion, Afghan and Ukraine and gawd knows what elseThese Court decisions may turn out to play a role in next November's elections. If the conservative Court gets orthodox it would be a boost to the Democrat's effort to turn out the vote
Is he supplying prayer mats for Muslim players?And why is the coach so insistent in pushing his legal case after being rejected many times? He clearly wants to promote religion.
It will be very interesting to me if these conservative judges believe in a living changing constitution when faced with a conservative cause that would require it.
Nonetheless, Kennedy v. Bremerton School District arrives before the justices Monday. It brings vexing questions about the ability of public employees to live out their faith while on duty and the government’s competing responsibility to protect schoolchildren from coercion and to remain neutral on the subject of religion.
The case offers a court that has recently been overwhelmingly protective of religious rights the chance to transform decades of Supreme Court jurisprudence that started 60 years ago with the admonition that government cannot organize and promote prayer in public schools.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/04/21/supreme-court-praying-football-coach/
These Court decisions may turn out to play a role in next November's elections. If the conservative Court gets orthodox it would be a boost to the Democrat's effort to turn out the vote
Good to see that you support kneeling during the anthem.The prayers were COMPLETELY VOLUNTARY.
READ THE 1st AMENDMENT.
IT DOESN'T SAY THAT THE FREE PRACTICE OF RELIGIION SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED, "UNLESS IT MAKES THE LEFTIDIOTS MAD".
Is he supplying prayer mats for Muslim players?