solid proof of evolution

He's using the term theory in the scientific sense. Not in the common sense that you are. In the scientific sense if a theory does not have a factual basis then it's simply not a theory. In the case of the theory of biological evolution by natural selection the theory is supported by three fundamental laws of nature. Those, are the law of inheritance, the law of variation and the law of superfecundancy which are easily observable facts.

thus macro evolution is not a theory in the scientific sense.......
 
Then the old theory gets tossed and you need a new one. Before you can do that though you need to provide empirical evidence of this first cause operating outside of space/time.

You’re conflating science with philosophy.

As a philosophical matter, a First Cause that exists outside of space/time solves the problem of infinite regression.
 
You're high. You're also a liar. There is no way in hell that anyone with a brain doesn't admit that there is a God.

You can't prove God doesn't exist, and you sure as hell can't explain, logically, how unorganized matter comes together and forms intelligent life. It's the stupidest idea ever conceived.

Don't forget that human activity and some link to climate is a hoax, we've got to get that one pounded in as well.
 
But a scientific theory has to explain all the evidence and make predictions. .

apparently it is you that does not know what a scientific theory is......I believe what you just described is actually a scientific law.......a scientific theory is something that must be tested to see if it explains evidence......
 
apparently it is you that does not know what a scientific theory is......I believe what you just described is actually a scientific law.......a scientific theory is something that must be tested to see if it explains evidence......

Says the poser who thinks that amoebas have a penis.
 
Couldn't find one. Will your dad do ?


th

is that a paleo-simian?......
 
Back
Top