cawacko
Well-known member
Isn't that why the majority voted for the war?
Some in Congress vote with their principles most vote how they best feel they can get re-elected.
Isn't that why the majority voted for the war?
Because we agreed with her platform in 2016, simple.
What did Hillary do as S.O.S. that made you feel she was any less hawkish than when she made the Iraq vote?
Some in Congress vote with their principles most vote how they best feel they can get re-elected.
Then there's one of two things: 1. She couldn't learn from her mistake or 2. She's lying. No other possibilities with herHillary admitted the Iraq War was a mistake over a decade ago. That her vote was a blunder.
So you finally acknowledge I'm a liberal. Because I never, ever supported Iraq even with the false intel.I can tell you as a first hand witness, that virtually every conservative on jpp.com supported the Iraq War Disaster, and defended it for years long after it became apparent to rational people that it was a historic clusterfuck of the first order.
I can count on one hand the number of conservatives who have publically admitted they were wrong, and jpp.com liberals were right.
Some of the original Iraq War supporters are now - belatedly - claiming to have been against the war and against Bush at the time. Will wonders never cease!
No, but I'm speaking within context of the OP. He's starting a thread on a war that started 14 years ago. So if he's bragging about it today and glorifying the people who were against it I don't think it out of line to ask why those same people voted for someone who supported that war.

Hillary Clinton on War & Peace
Continue anti-ISIS actions in Libya, with Europe & Arabs. (Feb 2016)
http://www.ontheissues.org/Hillary_Clinton.htm#War_+_Peace
OMG..![]()
Hillary Clinton is the person most responsible in the world for ISIS being in Libya..do i need to explain??? OMGWe aren't supposed to work against ISIS?
That's not the way the world works, and I think you know it.
Noted liberal senator George McGovern voted for the Tonkin Gulf resolution, before later realizing the Vietnam War was a catastrophic blunder. By 1972, the Democratic Party base was largely anti-Vietnam War. And you know what? I don't think anybody made a credible claim that Democrats were hypocritical to vote for McGovern based on the Tonkin Gulf vote of eight years earlier.
Redemption and learning from a mistake is a real thing Cawacko. The problem is, I have never heard you, and almost none of your Republlcan leaders, explicitly say that the Iraq War was a catastrophic, foolish, and unnecessary disaster of epic proportions. So, while Hillary may have learned a lesson, I have seen no evidence that you or the GOP more broadly learned any lessons from the Iraq War Disaster.
Hillary Clinton is the person most responsible in the world for ISIS being in Libya..do i need to explain??? OMG
OMG.trump campaigned on getting rid of ISIS and he tried to blame it on Hillary but the fact checkers say no.
Politifact
Donald Trump wrongly blames Hillary Clinton for creation of ISIS
Donald Trump and his vice presidential candidate Mike Pence gave their first joint interview to 60 Minutes and used the show to point the finger at Hillary Clinton for ISIS. Trump told CBS’s Lesley Stahl that the United States will have to declare war against ISIS -- and he vowed to do it with very few troops on the ground to wipe out ISIS.
"Hillary Clinton invented ISIS with her stupid policies," Trump said in an interview that aired July 17. "She is responsible for ISIS."
Trump has made this claim repeatedly. It’s wrong, and we’ll explain why.
The roots of ISIS
Trump was referring to Clinton’s actions related to Iraq, Libya and Syria, said Trump spokesman Stephen Miller, who referred us to a previous Trump speech on the topic.
The sources of ISIS are complex and interconnected, said John Pike, an expert on defense and director of GlobalSecurity.org, a website that provides information on defense.
"She may ‘share some of the blame’ but there is more than enough share to go around. She was in no sense the singular author of the thing," Pike said.
For starters, the terrorist group’s roots pre-date Obama’s presidency and Clinton’s role as secretary of state.

this from her own State Dept!
From: Jake Sullivan [mailtc
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 7:40 PM
To: Mills, Cheryl D; Nuland, Victoria
Subject: tick tock on libya
this is basically off the top of my head, with a few consultations of my notes. but it shows S'Clinton leadership/ownership/stewardship of this country's libya policy from start to finish.
let me know what you think. toria, who else might be able to add to this?
Secretary Clinton's leadership on Libya HRC has been a critical voice on Libya in administration deliberations, at NATO, and in contact group meetings — as well as the public face of the U.S. effort in Libya. She was instrumental in securing the the authorization, building the coalition, and tightening the noose around Qadhafi and his regime
https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/23898
I have the NYTimes if more is needed.
Clinton was most responsible -more than any other person for the rise of ISIS in Libya
Once Qadaffi was killed, the country fragmented. Here is ISIS killing Egyptian captive on a beach in Libya
it was not a "repubs against dems" thing. it was a antichrist spirit/ worldbank masters thing. the "global "establishment" which the "Amadeus" character serves has caused most all unlawful bloodshed since 1948. as long as you dumb assholes continue to see the world political "establishment" like a damned ball game [team a against team b] your emotions will render you unable to use the God given ability of deductive reasoning and will remain stupid blind partisans of "established" politics. dummies ..... ps : trump campaigned on a lot of reasonable, sensible, lawful, just and right things; things which the constitution declares as things worth shedding blood for. trump now knows, i hope; and all sensible people know that in order for the things he campaigned on to be fulfilled; a lot of bloodshed of traitors must occur. therefore... see signature... if trump does not "get it" ... see signature... either way,everything is on schedule as The Lord said.
'K, gomie.
with due respect back, because I DO know you read a lot as I do -this is a "slam dunk" ( as Tenent once said about Iraq)With all due respect anatta, I know you hate and despise her so I prefer to read a variety of opinions on what she's done and whether she is or isn't a war monger.
Way to miss the forest for the trees. You're throwing Hillary in as a red herring, as though somehow that disqualifies or mitigates the fact that as it pertains to the topic question, liberals were correct, conservatives were not. Hillary is not a liberal, she lost support from liberals in both presidential elections, and even though she was better than Trump, she was a bad choice for president. From a liberal perspective. Keep in mind that Trump advocated for WAR CRIMES throughout his candidacy. Hillary can't top that as a neocon-lite.
Why not just admit that liberals were and are on the right side of history in this case?