So its only the right: Democrat Harry Mitchell Places Opponent in Crosshairs

No it isn't it is not alright for one side to do it and not the other, you are being ridiculous thinking that people on the left feel it is, this is why most people don't talk to you seriously. It is wrong in ALL cases. I hope all politicians take a long hard look at what they have said and use other ways of expressing themselves beside violent metaphors or symbolism. It is time for it to stop because there are those people who can't filter it!

?

did you read nigel's posts? he said the ad is not wrong and is ok. he is defending the ad, he is not condemning it rana. go back and read his posts...and then get back to me
 
?

did you read nigel's posts? he said the ad is not wrong and is ok. he is defending the ad, he is not condemning it rana. go back and read his posts...and then get back to me

Jarod too-then there's christies never coming out and condemning the lefts use of them-just spinning a dishonest screed of "I have always condemend all hateful and violent imagery".

But getting back to the acual facts here: NO political ads/gimmicks/language have been tied to this or any other violent incident. It was disgustingly irresponsible for people to bring Palin into this-the fact of the matter is that they, certain media and political pundits as well as disingenuous posters right here- used this tragic event to attempt a political score against her and other conservative personalities.
 
?

did you read nigel's posts? he said the ad is not wrong and is ok. he is defending the ad, he is not condemning it rana. go back and read his posts...and then get back to me

Then get back to you, screw off you little booger.
 
I swear ID and her ilk don't have a single working brain cell among them.

When did she ever criticize the RW for all their nasty, threatening comments to those of us who opposed the war? All those people who said we should be hanged for treason, that we were obligated to stand by the prez in war time, that terrorists were monitoring the forums and every anti-war comment we made was aiding and abetting the enemy and putting the US in danger?

How about "you're either with us or you're with the terrorists", "love it or leave it", "if we don't fight them over there we'll be fighting them here". How about their smearing us when we stood up for Muslims or criticized U. S. atrocities?

For years people like ID and her cronies were nothing but drooling, blank-eyed bobbleheads taking in every word that fell from the liar-in-chief's mouth as if it were the Eucharist. Now they have the nerve to criticize us for talking about violent rhetoric.

Phony. Fraudulent. Hypocritical.
 
I swear ID and her ilk don't have a single working brain cell among them.

When did she ever criticize the RW for all their nasty, threatening comments to those of us who opposed the war? All those people who said we should be hanged for treason, that we were obligated to stand by the prez in war time, that terrorists were monitoring the forums and every anti-war comment we made was aiding and abetting the enemy and putting the US in danger?

How about "you're either with us or you're with the terrorists", "love it or leave it", "if we don't fight them over there we'll be fighting them here". How about their smearing us when we stood up for Muslims or criticized U. S. atrocities?

For years people like ID and her cronies were nothing but drooling, blank-eyed bobbleheads taking in every word that fell from the liar-in-chief's mouth as if it were the Eucharist. Now they have the nerve to criticize us for talking about violent rhetoric.

Phony. Fraudulent. Hypocritical.

:lolup:

when this is pointed out that you or other lefties to this, you bitch and moan about it and say i'm being a hack or whatever....can you say hypocritical, phony, fraudulent
 
:lolup:

when this is pointed out that you or other lefties to this, you bitch and moan about it and say i'm being a hack or whatever....can you say hypocritical, phony, fraudulent

I guess you missed your buddy's point about how I was obligated to "call out" Low and Prak for their comments years ago, whereas they were perfectly entitled to their remarks. :palm::palm:
 
Last edited:
It means others should remember the facts before trying to paint me as the bad guy. :pke:

She also always brings up the past and there is no way to prove or disprove her claims. There are more of us here who remember things a little differently than she does. The past is gone, it should stay in the past.
 
She also always brings up the past and there is no way to prove or disprove her claims. There are more of us here who remember things a little differently than she does. The past is gone, it should stay in the past.

At least you and I are trying.:loveu:
 
Back
Top