Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
you just said you weren't piling on palin or the tp etc....
yet you've have posted this ad nauseum
could you really be any more dishonest?
So its only the right: Democrat Harry Mitchell Places Opponent in Crosshairs
- Thread starter Cancel 2018. 3
- Start date
you just said you weren't piling on palin or the tp etc....
yet you've have posted this ad nauseum
could you really be any more dishonest?
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
its interesting to note the left wing hacks, except christie, have not bothered to condemn this...while nigel, bfgrn et al keep up their vitriol talk about palin's crosshairs, they don't even bother commenting in this thread
all they care about is smearing their political opponents, they don't want to change the vitriol rhetoric, they want to kick it up notch because they believe, hopefully wrongly, that it furthers their political agenda.
all they care about is smearing their political opponents, they don't want to change the vitriol rhetoric, they want to kick it up notch because they believe, hopefully wrongly, that it furthers their political agenda.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Do you mind? This is between me and fathead bravo.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
LOL....but you're not piling on palin, yet you keep talking about palin and trying to draw a connection to this incident....and you started right after the incident and you haven't let up
if you're going to claim something so ridiculous, its best not to have a written record that proves you're full of it
So you're position is that a 2006 campaign ad stating that J.D. Hayworth is the focus of a Justice Department investigation showing that graphic is "clearly a gun scope aimed at his opponents head." You're kidding, right?
christiefan915
Catalyst
LOL....but you're not piling on palin, yet you keep talking about palin and trying to draw a connection to this incident....and you started right after the incident and you haven't let up
if you're going to claim something so ridiculous, its best not to have a written record that proves you're full of it
You have zero reading comprehension. Maybe you should go back to the original exchange for clarification.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
that you think its not, when it is clearly aimed at his head, is frickin hilarious
i thoiught your tepid condemnation in the other thread was total bs, but now it appears confirmed....at least christie didn't bother to defend it
what a hack
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
You have zero reading comprehension. Maybe you should go back to the original exchange for clarification.
i comprehend quite well thank you
you said you're not piling on
i've shown you that you are in fact piling on
next
I'm all for condemning things that are worthy of condemnation. This doesn't even rank. Jesus. You interpretation of the ad is probably the least reasonable interpretation imaginable.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
yet you condemned palin's crosshairs over a MAP and won't condemn a democrat's crosshairs over an opponent's HEAD
that says alot about you nigel, thanks for the insight
You crack me up.
For those interested, here's the full Mitchell ad:
If your takeaway from that ad is that it clearly depicts "a gun scope aimed at his opponents head" and is suggestive of violence, you need to have your head examined. Or you're just a garden variety wingnut.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
already posted the full ad you moron
its pathetic how you DEFEND crosshairs at aimed at someone's head, but condemn crosshairs aimed a district on a map
what a left wing lunatic
I don't think you really understand the concept of context...
The clip I saw was only 6 second long. I condemn violent rhetoric and imagery. This isn't violent rhetoric or imagery. The voiceover makes clear what the image is referencing and it isn't a gun aimed at Longworth, it's the fact that he's a target of a Justice Department investigation.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
we get it nigel, no need to keep repeating it, its ok for a lefty to use crosshairs on their opponent, but not ok for a righty....
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
of course you can't see your blatent hypocrisy, you never can nigel
No, I can see my hypocrisy and logical flaws sometimes (not always, I admit) and I often reflect on it afterwards. I just don't see the ad as suggesting violence in any respect whatsoever.
Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
of course you don't, because a democrat made the ad....it bad to use crosshairs on a map when a righty does it, and good when a lefty uses crosshairs on someone's head
got it
No it isn't it is not alright for one side to do it and not the other, you are being ridiculous thinking that people on the left feel it is, this is why most people don't talk to you seriously. It is wrong in ALL cases. I hope all politicians take a long hard look at what they have said and use other ways of expressing themselves beside violent metaphors or symbolism. It is time for it to stop because there are those people who can't filter it!