Sessions met with Russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose

Stop lying yurtikins. It was the question.

SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign, what would you do?," the Minnesota Democrat asked.


SESSIONS: "I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."

What would you be saying if he ignored his duty as a Senator and not meet with foreign emissaries ?

He told the truth, he didn't meet with foreign emissaries as a surrogate of the Trump campaign, but only in his role as Senator, its just my hysteria on the pinhead side .......
 
What would you be saying if he ignored his duty as a Senator and not meet with foreign emissaries ?

He told the truth, he didn't meet with foreign emissaries as a surrogate of the Trump campaign, but only in his role as Senator, its just my hysteria on the pinhead side .......

How dim are you anyway? He said "I did NOT have communications with the Russians." He could have said that he met with the Russians in his role as senator, but he didn't. He out and out lied. Deal with it.
 
are you people totally retarded? they asked him specifically as part of trumps campaign did he meet with russia and he said no. He didn't say he never met with russia in his life as a member of the armed services committee. You people are pants on head fucking DUMB
 
If Sessions was acting in his capacity as a United State Senator and did not discuss the election campaign, then he did not commit perjury. In other words, his statements to the Judiciary Committee were truthful, not lies as Pelosi claims. Yet, armed with no evidence whatsoever, she has convicted Sessions without the benefit of a trial. Her accusations are not just baseless, given the known facts, but contemptible.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017...sessions-did-not-commit-perjury-or-crime.html

Poor Runetroll.
 
If Sessions was acting in his capacity as a United State Senator and did not discuss the election campaign, then he did not commit perjury. In other words, his statements to the Judiciary Committee were truthful, not lies as Pelosi claims. Yet, armed with no evidence whatsoever, she has convicted Sessions without the benefit of a trial. Her accusations are not just baseless, given the known facts, but contemptible.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017...sessions-did-not-commit-perjury-or-crime.html

Poor Runetroll.

Say goodbye to Jeffy
 
Well, it would be a mistake. America now has no faith in the us atty general.

That is not true. I don't think anyone's opinion of him changed because of this. The only people making a stink about it are lefties, which never liked him to begin with. It is clear he didn't lie.
 
Back
Top