Sessions met with Russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose

Did you talk with the Russians about the SALT treaty?

"I did not have communications with the Russians"


If it later turns out you did talk with them about the price of tea in China, then you lied!
 
"I did not have communications with the Russians.”

Sorry that is a lie, he did have communication with the Russians. It does not matter who he was working for at the time or what he was talking with them about.

Did you have communications with anyone from Russia as part of Trump's campaign?

And if it is true that he only had communications in his official capacity and not part of Trump's campaign, then how is his answer a lie?

Put on your 1L hat and figure it out Jarod.
 
it doesn't matter. he was a senator. it is over the heads of barack's stupid treason bureaus [many whom deserve lawful death sentences for their subversive treasons] and you stupid bastards who do not want the us gov. and the Russian federation [over the heads of the damned U,N. freaks ] to eradicate islam form the face of the earth. we have no choice.
 
Did you have communications with anyone from Russia as part of Trump's campaign?

And if it is true that he only had communications in his official capacity and not part of Trump's campaign, then how is his answer a lie?

Put on your 1L hat and figure it out Jarod.

Cuz he said "I did not have communications with the Russians.” yet it turns out he did.
 
Cuz he said "I did not have communications with the Russians.” yet it turns out he did.

The fact you refuse to actually answer my question, proves to me you know you are wrong, but simply can't admit it.

You just keep repeating conclusions, with zero analysis. Tell me, how well would that go over in court, let alone your first year of lawschool? What does A, in IRAC stand for Jarod?
 
Did you have communications with anyone from Russia as part of Trump's campaign?

And if it is true that he only had communications in his official capacity and not part of Trump's campaign, then how is his answer a lie?

Put on your 1L hat and figure it out Jarod.

1) That is not what he was asked.
2) Because what he said was untrue.
 
1) That is not what he was asked.
2) Because what he said was untrue.

From what I read, that is what he was asked. Please enlighten me as to the actual question.

At least you finally have processed this a bit more and realize that if, he was asked that, it would not be a lie.

Let's see the actual question.
 
During his confirmation hearing in January, Mr. Sessions was asked what he would do if any evidence emerged that someone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government during campaign and said: “I’m not aware of any of those activities.”

“I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn’t have—did not have communications with the Russians.”

wsj.com
 
"Affiliated"
"communicated"

"I didn't have-did not have communications with the Russians."

Yet he did!
 
"what would you do if you learned of any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government?"

"I did not have communications with the RUSSIANS"

Pure and simple lie.
 
Today he released a new statement...

"I did not have communications with the Russian government, about the campaign."

That is NOT a lie... as far as we know.
 
maybe it can be reduced some more for you babies who can't eat solid food yet. barack is an islamic grand jihadist traitor [antichrist]. the world is on fire with islamic terror/ murder/ violence [like the days before noah]. the clintons and the falsely so called enlightened "elites" are in on the global treason game as deeply as barack. you bastards have been his citizenslave enablers. the us gov. is going to cooperate with the people that will help them clean up the apocalyptic holocaust created by barack and hillary which is islam. maybe. wishful thinking anyway.
 
Seems to me his answer was in direct response to him being affiliated with the Trump campaign.

Sure, but he did not limit it to that in his answer. He knows better than that. He was simply lying, did not know he was being investigated by the FBI at the time.


Had he said what he said today.... it would not have been a lie.

Frankin's question said ANYONE AFFILIATED COMMUNICATED. It did not even limit it to discussing the campaign it was open to ALL topics of communication.
 
Did anyone affiliated with the Party talk to you?

"I didnt speak with anyone from the party" is a lie even if you only spoke with Jane from the party about how pretty the moon is and didnt speak about the party itself.
 
Did anyone affiliated with the campaign speak with the Russians?

If you 1) spoke with the Russians and 2) are affiliated with the campaign, the truthful answer then is..... YES.

If you say no, because you did not discuss the campaign, you are LYING!
 
Back
Top