Sessions met with Russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose

Jarod said:
Why does it even matter he said...

"I did not have communications with the Russians.” That statement was NOT TRUE, regardless of what the question was.
Click to expand...

More stupidity and dishonesty; you're quite full of it fake attorney. :rofl2:

The FAKE attorney loves his FAKE news. :rofl2:
 
Yaya said:
It damn well could be. Did you have communications with Russia as part of Trump's campaign? That would be a no. In your official capacity? Then that would be a lie.

People say you're a lawyer and I thought lawyers were good at seeing both sides of an argument and to be leery about such absolute statements as yours above.
Click to expand...

Jarod isn't an attorney; he's a sociopathic lying liberal on steroids. But that was one of the GOOD things about Trumps election, it has forced them all to shed all pretense of intelligence or honesty.
 
Jarod said:
I think he said... "I did not have communications with the Russians.”

Had he said, I did not have communications with the Russians as a representative of the Trump campaign, that would not have been a lie. He said something totally different. Just like when Clinton said, "I did not have sex with that woman." He might well have meant vaginal sex, not oral sex.

If Clinton had said, "The question was asking about vaginal sex." would you have said.... oh.. never mind, the question changed the lie into a truth?
Click to expand...

More lies; you're quite full of them FAKE lawyer. :rofl2:
 
Yaya said:
Bullshit. Did you have communications as a member of Trump's campaign vs. in your official capacity.

He could honestly answer no to the first question. Stop being such a dumbass. You are not intelligent on this, by any means. You're hysterical. Put on your lawyer hat, and think about this for a second, then get back to me.
Click to expand...

Jarod said:
It does not matter what the question was...
Click to expand...

^This is your brain on dishonest dumbass; don't be one.
 
Yaya said:
And btw, I am sure you are a good lawyer Jarod.
Click to expand...

Based on this guys dishonesty and stupid claims and arguments, there is no way he is even a relation to a lawyer. The man is a dishonest leftist idiot on steroids and that is all he is.

Good lord, just look at the amount of time he spends here desperately trying to remove any doubt what a dumb, dishonest leftist dimwit on steroids he is.

:rofl2:
 
Jarod said:
During his confirmation hearing in January, Mr. Sessions was asked what he would do if any evidence emerged that someone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government during campaign and said: “I’m not aware of any of those activities.”

“I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn’t have—did not have communications with the Russians.”

wsj.com
Click to expand...

I have highlighted to relevant; good lord, even a moron with the IQ of 5 could grasp the reality of that question.

They could also grasp the dishonest lies you post taking the answer OUT OF CONTEXT. Let's face it, you're a FAKE lawyer who couldn't debate your way out of a wet paper sack.

Anyone hiring someone as incompetent as you needs to get their heads examined. :rofl2:
 
Jarod said:
Remember Tom from the Campaign, have you spoken to him?

If you say no, but you did speak with him about how hot Jenna is, then you are lying... even if you did not speak with him about the Campaign.
Click to expand...

Jarod said:
He did not say, "I have not spoken with the Russians as a representative of the campaign." He said, I was affiliated with the campaign and I DID NOT SPEAK WITH THE RUSSIANS.
Click to expand...

biglaugh7_zpsd701e485.gif


You have to be the shittiest FAKE lawyer on the planet. But here is MY prediction of the outcome; the emotional hysterics by the idiots on the left will amount to NOTHING.

Dunce.
 
Jarod said:
no I am not, I am giving you examples. What is sad is that you cant see that the question was clearly open ended to any topic of conversation.

You are pitiful or dumb one of the two. VERY BASIC LOGIC
Click to expand...

Irony from the FAKE lying lawyer. :rofl2:
 
Yaya said:
Christiekins is now just making stuff up and completely ignoring the facts presented in her own link.
Click to expand...

:rolleyes: Yurtikins the secret trumpist is pretending this isn't a big deal when Sessions is found to be lying in a taped hearing. Sessions didn't plead faulty memory, he flat-out lied. Ask yourself yurtikins why he didn't admit he spoke with the envoy if it was all so harmless?

During his confirmation hearings in January, Sessions, however, did not mention his conversations with Sergey Kislyak.

SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign, what would you do?," the Minnesota Democrat asked.

SESSIONS: "I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."

DATE: January 10
--------------------------

SEN. PATRICK J. LEAHY: Several of the President-elect's nominees or senior advisers have Russian ties. Have you been in contact with anyone connected to any part of the Russian government about the 2016 election, either before or after election day?" the Vermont Democrat asked in a questionnaire.

SESSIONS: No.


DATE: January 10

US intelligence officials consider Kislyak a top spy and spy recruiter, according to current and former senior US government officials. Russia's foreign affairs ministry denied the characterization.
Kislyak is the same man who met Trump's former national security adviser, Mike Flynn, before the President took office. Flynn resigned from his post after 23 days over his communications with Russia.
 
Last edited:
Yaya said:
It damn well could be. Did you have communications with Russia as part of Trump's campaign? That would be a no. In your official capacity? Then that would be a lie.

People say you're a lawyer and I thought lawyers were good at seeing both sides of an argument and to be leery about such absolute statements as yours above.
Click to expand...

This was the question and he flat-out lied. He communicated with an envoy of the Russian government in the course of the campaign. He did not qualify his "no" or explain in what capacity he communicated with the government. He said he didn't do it, period.

SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign, what would you do?," the Minnesota Democrat asked.

SESSIONS: "I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."
 
Last edited:
Yaya said:
That wasn't the question Jarod. What was the question. It makes all the difference in the world.

Comparing this to Clinton is the height of dishonesty for you. You have taken a deep dive off the shallow end ever since Trump won.
Click to expand...

Stop lying yurtikins. It was the question.

SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign, what would you do?," the Minnesota Democrat asked.


SESSIONS: "I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I did not have communications with the Russians."
 
Yaya said:
As he was not affiliated with the campaign when he spoke with the guy, I am not sure it is a lie.
Click to expand...

Jeebus. He was affiliated with the campaign. How low are you going to sink to defend this bozo?

Sessions, a former senator from Alabama who was among Trump’s early and most vocal surrogates on the campaign trail, did not disclose the conversations when asked under oath during his Senate confirmation hearing in early 2017 about possible contacts between Trump’s campaign and Moscow.
 
christiefan915 said:
SEN. AL FRANKEN: "If there was any evidence that anyone affiliated with the Trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this (2016) campaign
Click to expand...

Chrispy ignores this part of the question because it serves her purposes better to continue being a lying bitch.......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top