Senate passes bill to give police protection to families of Supreme Court justices

TOP said:
Great story for every occasion...Why not just roll down your window, though?
Click to expand...

It's funny how you Reichtards are in favor of law and order, and Blue Lives Matter, except on January 6. :laugh:

Now toddle along and whine on your #JustAboutDeadThread about TDS and how you took over another thread. Scoot, Ugmo, scoot!
 
Jarod said:
Because she shouted orders and needed to learn the government does not have that right in that situation. Police are the most direct representatives of the government and when they overstep, if we allow it, we become subjects not citizens.
Click to expand...
Why not just roll down the window? And then report her later.... You said you have her on video....That's odd to begin with...Why were you videoing? Sounds like you were in the wrong to begin with....
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
WTF. Over a fucking parking violation? Why did she want you to roll down a back window? Dumb question: Are you a person of color?
Click to expand...

No, she claimed it was for officer safety, I never got a answer as to why she demanded the window be opened. Had she asked me nicely acknowledging that it was my right to choose to do it, I would’ve gladly opened the window. My theory is that the condo commandos were upset about people having beach access, and more demanding the police do something about it.
 
TOP said:
Why not just roll down the window? And then report her later.... You said you have her on video....That's odd to begin with...Why were you videoing? Sounds like you were in the wrong to begin with....
Click to expand...

Report her for yelling at me? No, I don’t let the government bully me.
 
Jarod said:
Report her for yelling at me? No, I don’t let the government bully me.
Click to expand...
Officers don't bully out of the blue...;) Roll down the window.. Be a Great role model for the kids...Especially if you were violating the law to begin with...
You could have avoided everything with a bit of common sense...and a bit of cooperation...
What a wasted opportunity... No surprise though...
 
TOP said:
Officers don't bully out of the blue...;) Roll down the window.. Be a Great role model for the kids...Especially if you were violating the law to begin with...
You could have avoided everything with a bit of common sense...and a bit of cooperation...
What a wasted opportunity... No surprise though...
Click to expand...

Some officers bully out of the blue. My example for the kids was to not be bullied by the government.
 
You would comply when an agent of the government shouts a demand at you that you are not required by law to comply with?
 
Jarod said:
Some officers bully out of the blue. My example for the kids was to not be bullied by the government.
Click to expand...
So what did they learn? Not a thing that will ever benefit them in the future... You were breaking the law...it was up to you to handle it...You chose not to...Such a shame... I'm sure there's much more to this story than we hearing here....
 
Jarod said:
Good, the Democratic majority is protecting our government.

I believe in the right to protest. I believe protesters have a right to protest at the homes of S.Ct. Justices, but I don’t think they should.

Families should be left alone.
Click to expand...

So basically Senate had to pass a law to once again protect people from violence from the party that loves to bill itself as tolerant, loving, caring and fair. And you wonder why no one takes democrats seriously.
 
Jarod said:
Good, the Democratic majority is protecting our government.

I believe in the right to protest. I believe protesters have a right to protest at the homes of S.Ct. Justices, but I don’t think they should.

Families should be left alone.
Click to expand...

what police does Congress control ? if its Capital police that protection is pretty suspect.
 
TOP said:
So what did they learn? Not a thing that will ever benefit them in the future... You were breaking the law...it was up to you to handle it...You chose not to...Such a shame... I'm sure there's much more to this story than we hearing here....
Click to expand...

They learned that even at the street level do not let the government take power they should not legally have.
 
Jarod said:
Good, the Democratic majority is protecting our government.

I believe in the right to protest. I believe protesters have a right to protest at the homes of S.Ct. Justices, but I don’t think they should.

Families should be left alone.
Click to expand...
The law says they don't have the right to protest at any judge's home. Aren't you a lawyer?
 
Last edited:
Jarod said:
They learned that even at the street level do not let the government take power they should not legally have.
Click to expand...
So they learned nothing except for something that may eventually may get them into trouble.. I hope you don't eventually regret what you've done... You accomplished nothing...
 
When did we start allowing Justice's spouses of the Supreme Court to participate in insurrections and trying to illegally change the outcomes of presidential elections?

When did we start allowing the President and his Cabinet members to participate in insurrections and trying to illegally change the outcomes of presidential elections?

When did we start allowing the legislative branch members to start participating in insurrections and trying to illegally change the outcomes of presidential elections?

Just some honest questions!

Is it just me, or is anyone else concerned about these atrocities?

I think what we have here is a corruption of all 3 branches of government- AND IT WAS CORRUPTED BY TRUMP AND HIS TRUMPTARDS!

And since Trump is still the leader of the Republican party, and as long as that is the case, it seems as if a vote for Republicans in any race today, is a vote for further corruption of our government!

Because Republicans clearly do not care about these atrocities! In fact, Republicans are in favor of them!

Let the denials begin PLEASE!

Who's first?
 
Last edited:
Geeko Sportivo said:
When did we start allowing Justice's spouses of the Supreme Court to participate in insurrections and trying to illegally change the outcomes of presidential elections?
Click to expand...

you mean when did we allow the spouse to text questions about the legitimacy of an election and options available. did she do anything more than that? not to my knowledge

you shit stains would criminalize speech - not actions - speech. thought crimes and disinformation cabinets. how do you sleep at night?
 
Phantasmal said:
Yes, and women’s right to privacy in their healthcare should be left alone as well, but Alito feels he can overturn 50 years of precedent, people become passionate. The protest if peaceful, should not be prohibited. If they become violent, then action can be taken. I doubt Alito and his family are in harms way.
Click to expand...
There was 185 year precedent of the states deciding about abortion before Roe. Currently Federal law prohibits protesting at judges homes. The protesters are violating the law. They should warn these people that what they are doing is illegal. Then if they don't disperse they should make arrest. Trying to intimidate judges isn't how American justice should work. So you can assure Alito that the wacko that fire bombed that abortion counseling organization won't firebomb his and his family's home.

18 U.S. Code § 1507 - Picketing or parading

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Click to expand...
 
Jarod said:
Good, the Democratic majority is protecting our government.
Click to expand...

Signs of third world shit holeism thanks to the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses and their senile unaccomplished leader Biden.

How sad to watch them erect a riot fence to protect the highest court in the land from angry, triggered, brain dead mobs who hate democracy and this country's institutions.

How sad that we need to protect the families and homes of jurists from these same mobs. This isn't a sign of prgressivism. It's regressing to the lowest common denominator of mob rule. Democrats and leftists should be ashamed to see what they have regressed to. But alas, they're stupid and uneducated and don't care about the destruction they wreak, as long as they get their way. Much like spoiled little, narcissistic children.

Jarod said:
I believe in the right to protest. I believe protesters have a right to protest at the homes of S.Ct. Justices, but I don’t think they should.
Click to expand...

For a self-described attorney, you sure know very little about the law. They do NOT have that right and it is a Federal crime. 18 USC § 2261A and 18 U.S.C. 1507.

If democrats truly cared about our "LAWS" they would be asking the Justice Departments to start arresting organizations that posted their addresses and plan/promote attacks on the court and places of worship.

Jarod said:
Families should be left alone.
Click to expand...

You're not very sincere. You're not very honest. These are YOUR people and it's YOUR side that thinks it's A OK to harass and attack those they disagree with. We saw that in the summer of 2020.

The ONLY time leftists care about privacy and crime is when it comes to THEIR homes and THEIR judges. :palm:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top