School lunch shaming will now be against the law in California

[Text Drivers are Killers]

HAHAHA. Notice how the article has a pic of a white kid even though all the lunch thieves are blacks or illegals. Schools should NOT serve meals. The parents should pack a lunch for the kids.

https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/13/us/california-schools-lunch-law/index.html

oxt 13 2019 (CNN)California just took a step toward making its school environments a little more inclusive.
Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law a new piece of legislation that guarantees all students will receive lunch even if their parents or guardians have not paid their meal fees.
The bill, authored by state Sen. Robert Hertzberg, says students shouldn't be denied a meal of their choice because of unpaid fees. It also ensures "that the pupil is not shamed or treated differently from other pupils."
The legislation also addresses ways to more effectively notify parents and guardians of a negative balance.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Anything to help blacks and illegals steal from working whites. To criminals school is not about education. It's just about free day care and free food.

 

[floridafan]

Anything to help blacks and illegals steal from working whites. To criminals school is not about education. It's just about free day care and free food.

So my little racist piece of shit, you would let poor children starve to death, while of course, giving more and more tax breaks to the wealthy!

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

So my little racist piece of shit, you would let poor children starve to death, while of course, giving more and more tax breaks to the wealthy!

If they starve it's the parent's fault. Why can't they pack a lunch for the kid.? Why do white people have to feed all the non-whites?

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Just don't feed the kids anything and then the problem is solved. My mom used to pack a lunch for me and guess what. That system worked.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

So my little racist piece of shit, you would let poor children starve to death, while of course, giving more and more tax breaks to the wealthy!

it is illegal to call children without lunch, poor........

 

[Flash]

So my little racist piece of shit, you would let poor children starve to death, while of course, giving more and more tax breaks to the wealthy!

If they are poor they qualify for free breakfast and lunch.

 

[Jade Dragon]

Poor butthurt little creampuff, TDAK.

 

[Micawber]

Add pro shaming of kids as a Republican plank

 

[StoneByStone]

HAHAHA. Notice how the article has a pic of a white kid even though all the lunch thieves are blacks or illegals. Schools should NOT serve meals. The parents should pack a lunch for the kids.

And if the parents can't afford food?

 

[CFM]

So my little racist piece of shit, you would let poor children starve to death, while of course, giving more and more tax breaks to the wealthy!

That's funny coming from someone that claims to care so much for poor children but supports the government forcing someone else to feed them.

Why do you support enabling irresponsible parents?

 

[CFM]

And if the parents can't afford food?

Not my problem. Someone else's kids aren't my responsibility.

If you care as much as you seem to claim you care, why aren't you personally feeding them yourself?

 

[CFM]

Add pro shaming of kids as a Republican plank

Addressing irresponsible parents is a bad thing?

 

[CFM]

If they are poor they qualify for free breakfast and lunch.

It's not free. Those of us that feed, or fed, our own kids are required to feed the kids of irresponsible parents. Why does anyone support enabling irresponsible parents to be irresponsible?

 

[CFM]

If they starve it's the parent's fault. Why can't they pack a lunch for the kid.? Why do white people have to feed all the non-whites?

Floridafan supports enabling irresponsible parents to be irresponsible

 

[StoneByStone]

Not my problem. Someone else's kids aren't my responsibility.

If you care as much as you seem to claim you care, why aren't you personally feeding them yourself?

I do, I volunteer at a soup kitchen. And I have no problem with the state government using my taxes to feed kids in school.

 

[CFM]

I do, I volunteer at a soup kitchen. And I have no problem with the state government using my taxes to feed kids in school.

Not the same. Not even close.

If you cared as much as you claim, you wouldn't need someone telling you. You'd voluntarily pay for it yourself.

Typical bleeding heart mentality.

 

[StoneByStone]

Not the same. Not even close.

If you cared as much as you claim, you wouldn't need someone telling you. You'd voluntarily pay for it yourself.

Typical bleeding heart mentality.

Which is why I volunteer. However, I also know that the government has more resources to help more people, which is why I support my taxes being used to fund school lunches.
If you're so cold that you don't care if children starve, you might have some problems.

 

[Earl]

So my little racist piece of shit, you would let poor children starve to death, while of course, giving more and more tax breaks to the wealthy!

Parents who don’t provide food for their own children are responsible for any starvation that would occur.

Poor parents who force others to feed their children shouldn’t have children.

Millions of jobs are provided by the wealthy whose taxes help feed the poor and their children.

 

[CFM]

Which is why I volunteer. However, I also know that the government has more resources to help more people, which is why I support my taxes being used to fund school lunches.
If you're so cold that you don't care if children starve, you might have some problems.

You don't volunteer to pay the taxes. You have to be told. If you cared, you'd provide the money without having to be told.

I'm not letting them starve. Their parents are. Since they aren't my responsibility, I can't be held accountable for something that isn't my responsibility.

Why do you support enabling irresponsible parents to be irresponsible?