School lunch shaming will now be against the law in California

Typical do-nothing leftist. Why is it okay for people to have kids they refuse to take responsibility for? Who, in the USA, cannot feed their kids? Prove it.

A leftist is someone that is more than willing to spend someone else's money, claim compassion for it, then act like the money came from their pockets.
 
https://www.wlwt.com/article/school...w-be-against-the-law-in-california-1/29450743

read this and then comment.

You seriously want little kids emotionally scarred for want of $40 in a food account? You want them malnourished?
The fiscal impact of paying for school lunches for poor parent's kids has got to be nil. And you, sitting judgment
in tumbleweed connection in Kansas have a problem if OUR duly elected governor and legislature decide NOT
to be assholes? You think that is any of your business. You want to dictate ASSHOLENESS for California? Die quickly,
deplorable Trumptards.
 
I for one have no problem with the school system providing lunch for children. We have been doing it for decades why get your panties in a wad now?
 
Irresponsible parents who can’t or won’t care for their own children are guilty of child abuse.

There are thousands of voluntary charitable groups that care for the children of irresponsible parents.
 
Let’s be clear, Pebble by Pebble, parents are responsible for feeding their own children.

I am not responsible for feeding your children.

If you are too poor to provide food for your children or buy drugs and alcohol instead of food, don’t have children until you can afford to care for your own children.

See how easy that is?

Leftists lack the intelligence it would take to comprehend what "responsibility" means. In their tiny little minds, it means Government welfare.
 
https://www.wlwt.com/article/school...w-be-against-the-law-in-california-1/29450743

read this and then comment.

You seriously want little kids emotionally scarred for want of $40 in a food account? You want them malnourished?
The fiscal impact of paying for school lunches for poor parent's kids has got to be nil. And you, sitting judgment
in tumbleweed connection in Kansas have a problem if OUR duly elected governor and legislature decide NOT
to be assholes? You think that is any of your business. You want to dictate ASSHOLENESS for California? Die quickly,
deplorable Trumptards.

If those kids are emotionally scared or malnourished, the blame should be placed where it belongs. On THEIR parents for refusing to keep money in the account and feed them.
 
Leftists lack the intelligence it would take to comprehend what "responsibility" means. In their tiny little minds, it means Government welfare.


Lefties also think compassion comes from supporting someone else being forced to do what they say should be done.
 
I'm not a big fan of AOC, but she is right about one thing. We always have money for wars and helping out the rich. We only have empty pockets when it comes to helping working-class Americans.

AOC is a lying dumbass. You're an uneducated dunce who is a dupe to her moronic talking points. The Rich don't get anything from Government. They are paying the lions share. The Wars we get into are to free people from despots, tyrants and dictators who START those wars.

You pretentious America hating leftists need to extract your heads from your collective assholes and get educated with the facts.

If you ignore irresponsible people doing irresponsible things and force the American taxpayers to pay for their poor decisions, you get MORE of the same. That is why Democratically controlled urban shit holes are now infested with homeless people living in lice and rat infested communes under bridges and along freeways.
 
If they are poor they qualify for free groceries.
I agree schools should drop cafeterias altogether. Needless expense.

Many of those on food stamps (EBT) also have kids that qualify for free school lunch. Redundancy seems to be a problem. If the family is receiving funds through food stamps to buy food, why are they also receiving free lunch?
 
No, I'm saying it's ok to help people who were made poor by the system because we live in a society and some of us aren't evil.

This is an epic lie; no one can make someone poor in this country. It is FULL of opportunity and provides a taxpayer funded school system so that EVERYONE can have a chance at the prosperity this nation provides.

When you begin your arguments with lies and strawmen, they have already failed and not worthy of further debate.
 
Irresponsible parents who can’t or won’t care for their own children are guilty of child abuse.

There are thousands of voluntary charitable groups that care for the children of irresponsible parents.

It’s understandable why the left supports Socialism. Have some couple who don’t have children be forced to pay for the children of irresponsible parents.

Everyone suffers equally under Socialism.
 
You still haven’t bothered to read the article. Obviously too busy playing with your honey pot. Got a new vibrator.???

You still haven't acknowledged it's not the responsibility of someone that isn't a kid's parent to do for that kid what his/her own parents refuse to do.
 
AOC is a lying dumbass. You're an uneducated dunce who is a dupe to her moronic talking points. The Rich don't get anything from Government. They are paying the lions share. The Wars we get into are to free people from despots, tyrants and dictators who START those wars.

You pretentious America hating leftists need to extract your heads from your collective assholes and get educated with the facts.

If you ignore irresponsible people doing irresponsible things and force the American taxpayers to pay for their poor decisions, you get MORE of the same. That is why Democratically controlled urban shit holes are now infested with homeless people living in lice and rat infested communes under bridges and along freeways.
Hand salute.
 
Back
Top