Ron Insana: Gun Makers Must Be Held Liable for Every Massacre

SmarterthanYou said:
it's funny that idiot liberal anti gunners use the car/gun analogy when it comes to regulating and licensing, but claim false equivalency when they are confronted with the damage potential and facts..........
Click to expand...

You really think guns get you anywhere besides dead, nutter?
 
domer76 said:
You can always count on a RW barrel-stroker to attempt the lame car/gun analogy.

Another failure on your part, shitstain. That's a chronic problem for you.
Click to expand...

let me help you LEFT WING IDIOTS HERE ,i have a constitutional right to own guns ,you want to change that right see ARTICLE 5 of the CONSTITUTION ,stop whining.
 
iolo said:
You really think guns get you anywhere besides dead, nutter?
Click to expand...

Guns SAVE lives and gun free zones INCREASE deaths. Look at chicago.

OTOH what good comes from letting people drive cars that do twice the speed limit?. Or giving them internet access to play with while driving ? THINK
 
chink said:
let me help you LEFT WING IDIOTS HERE ,i have a constitutional right to own guns ,you want to change that right see ARTICLE 5 of the CONSTITUTION ,stop whining.
Click to expand...

You sure do, bitch. However, bitch, that has NOTHING to do with the absurd car/gun analogy.

Bitch.
 
domer76 said:
You sure do, bitch. However, bitch, that has NOTHING to do with the absurd car/gun analogy.

Bitch.[y

tell you what bad-ass ,you might want to wash out your mouth,you rude child.

"Is there a right to drive a vehicle? Is that really a serious question?"

there is no constitutional right to drive a car ,there is to bear arms ,yes there is such a thing a constitutional right to bear arms,there is not constitutional right to drive a car,but you do have a constitutional right to rum that motor mouth,genius.


it has everything dp dp woth
Click to expand...
 
Yaya said:
Obviously you're too chickenshit to answer it.

Poor Dumber, knows when his ass is kicked so he'll just insult and not address the discussion.
Click to expand...

since he doesn't have a single damned clue what is and isn't a right, he can't address the question, much less the discussion
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Guns SAVE lives and gun free zones INCREASE deaths. Look at chicago.

OTOH what good comes from letting people drive cars that do twice the speed limit?. Or giving them internet access to play with while driving ? THINK
Click to expand...

As you know, Chicago contains ghettoes for the poor, to whom you sell drugs and guns whatever the local laws. Civiiised countries have far safer than your nuthouse. What on earth is the second bit about? It sounds like eight-pint stuff to me.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
worked for me as a Marine. It works for hundreds of thousands of police on a weekly basis, so yes.....it works for me.......serf
Click to expand...

Aye, you kill a lot of people, but mostly you get beat by those who think they'd prefer to be without murderous nutters. Make the world one big Vietnam, I dare you! :)
 
SmarterthanYou said:
hows that work when i'm the one with the guns? ROFL
Click to expand...

They hide behind a bush and shoot you in the back, obviously. Swaggering bullies seldom beat guerrillas, as you frequently demonstrate - and countries run by gunmen soon decline into real crapholes.
 
iolo said:
They hide behind a bush and shoot you in the back, obviously. Swaggering bullies seldom beat guerrillas, as you frequently demonstrate - and countries run by gunmen soon decline into real crapholes.
Click to expand...

so people who are afraid of people with and using guns will use guns to rid themselves of people using guns............wow ROFL
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so people who are afraid of people with and using guns will use guns to rid themselves of people using guns............wow ROFL
Click to expand...

Two separate issues. Armies use guns because they are at war, but beating your chests and roaring don't do the business - you have to have a strategy that works. Only utter barbarians use guns against fellow citizens, as you know.
 
domer76 said:
You sure do, bitch. However, bitch, that has NOTHING to do with the absurd car/gun analogy.

Bitch.
Click to expand...

Absurd gun/car analogy?? HAHAHA. What you mean is you don't have an answer to it. You libs want to ban all guns while you defend your "right" to have cars that do twice the speed limit!!! Nobody likes a hypocrite.
 
iolo said:
Two separate issues. Armies use guns because they are at war, but beating your chests and roaring don't do the business - you have to have a strategy that works. Only utter barbarians use guns against fellow citizens, as you know.
Click to expand...

right, because it certainly makes one compassionate and empathetic to recognize that the human in front of you trying to stab or shoot you is just in a lot of pain and you dying will be great therapy for him.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
right, because it certainly makes one compassionate and empathetic to recognize that the human in front of you trying to stab or shoot you is just in a lot of pain and you dying will be great therapy for him.
Click to expand...

Most people have police. Get rid of those racist gun-men and get some instead.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Absurd gun/car analogy?? HAHAHA. What you mean is you don't have an answer to it. You libs want to ban all guns while you defend your "right" to have cars that do twice the speed limit!!! Nobody likes a hypocrite.
Click to expand...

Go bitch slap your mom for failing you in reading comprehension in home school, you fucking moron.

Your moronic car/gun analogy failed the first time, you fucking idiot. The thousandth or more mention of it doesn't make it true. It just demonstrates that you are a fucking cretin.

But we knew that anyway, cretin.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top