Ron Insana: Gun Makers Must Be Held Liable for Every Massacre

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Cars do far far more killing than guns but insana is OK with that. Hell - car makers are allowed to sell cars that do twice the legal speed limit!! Liberals say cool.

http://www.newsmax.com/Finance/Inve...-gun-makers-accountable/2017/10/06/id/818219/

oct 6 2017 Economic guru Ron Insana says investors should strike back at firearms manufacturers and call for gun makers to be held accountable, and legally liable, for every massacre caused by their weapons.

“It would seem that the time for polite debate about gun control is over,” Insana wrote in a blog for CNBC.

“Gun makers, as tobacco companies have been, should be held accountable, and legally liable, for the mass casualties that their products are responsible for, with severe penalties, class-action lawsuits and other disincentives awaiting them at every turn,” the author of four books on Wall Street explained.
Click to expand...
 
TheDonald said:
Then highway makers are responsible for all highway deaths, and what about hospitals, they kill oodles of people all the time
Click to expand...

Hey einstein. There's nothing wrong with the highways. But the auto industry is certainly in the wrong to DESIGN cars to do twice the legal speed limit and also to install internet access and all the other distracting toys. They WANT crashes. Car crashes mean car sales. THINK
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
Cars do far far more killing than guns but insana is OK with that. Hell - car makers are allowed to sell cars that do twice the legal speed limit!! Liberals say cool.
Click to expand...

You can always count on a RW barrel-stroker to attempt the lame car/gun analogy.

Another failure on your part, shitstain. That's a chronic problem for you.
 
domer76 said:
You can always count on a RW barrel-stroker to attempt the lame car/gun analogy.

Another failure on your part, shitstain. That's a chronic problem for you.
Click to expand...

Nothing lame about it. The analogy between guns and cars is extremely strong. You just don't have an answer to it.
 
it's funny that idiot liberal anti gunners use the car/gun analogy when it comes to regulating and licensing, but claim false equivalency when they are confronted with the damage potential and facts..........
 
SmarterthanYou said:
it's funny that idiot liberal anti gunners use the car/gun analogy when it comes to regulating and licensing, but claim false equivalency when they are confronted with the damage potential and facts..........
Click to expand...

Try a society sans vehicles, idiot.

Try a society sans guns, idiot.

Wait, we have in the latter. It minimizes gun deaths. How about that?
 
domer76 said:
Try a society sans vehicles, idiot.

Try a society sans guns, idiot.

Wait, we have in the latter. It minimizes gun deaths. How about that?
Click to expand...

I own both guns and cars. My point is people who attack one must also attack the other, but libs won't do that. They attack guns but support the far bigger and far more correctable problem of vehicle violence. THINK
 
domer76 said:
You can always count on a RW barrel-stroker to attempt the lame car/gun analogy.

Another failure on your part, shitstain. That's a chronic problem for you.
Click to expand...

You can always count on a LW NL like you to downplay the serious of someone dying in a car.

I guess your failures can be summed up by applying genetics. You simply CAN'T do better no matter how hard you try. You've reached a pinnacle and it's still a failure.
 
BenneC20171007_low.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top