BartenderElite
Verified User
A lot of conservatives spent the past decade or so reassuring all of us that this would "never" happen.
Honestly - I do hate being right all the time.
Honestly - I do hate being right all the time.
We were drinking that night, but if I had cum in her, she'd probably be my woman to this day.
6'3" natural curly-headed blonde. Natural titties (not very big) They turned me on, though.
But dat ass! Oh! She was a great lover, too. I fucked up bad.![]()
Suck my dick.
Suck my dick.
no it's not "radical" Roe's problem was always it's grounded in implied rightsOf course. We have a radical right-wing court now, and will for decades.
A lot is about to change.
no it's not "radical" Roe's problem was always it's grounded in implied rights
Implied rights are real,and not 2nd class, but they rely on stare decisis -not the Constitutional text.
So this court is technically correct, I just think it would have been better to leave it alone
and accept the implied right as stare decisis
I can think of a few I could have and not regretted it.


Suck my dick.

no point in overturning, and stare decisis and implied rights of privacy should have kept Roe v Wade
And this "states decide" -what good is that? Im as big a supporter of federalism as anyone - maybe more-
but I see nothing gained - just more difficult access for women.
your debate skills are almost as childish as this retort.![]()
He's just kidding, he doesn't have one.
Will the leftists send out paid rioters today, or tomorrow?
They've already been talking about murdering Supreme Court justices.
precedent isn't permanent. Like I said the whole thing was a house of cards as there isn't any rights to privacy anymore (another bad thing), and if you only rely on precedence..you are building on quicksandRoe was established precedent.
SCOTUS overturned it because they're a radical body now. It's a right-wing, theocratic court.
Roe was established precedent.
SCOTUS overturned it because they're a radical body now. It's a right-wing, theocratic court.
They are out now.
Wow. I never thought I'd see this. Absolutely wild.
Of course. We have a radical right-wing court now, and will for decades.
A lot is about to change.
Yep! It's called over-reach! It's called politics!
This is where politics has gone in America.
But, it takes a disaster like the attack on Pearl Harbor or this kind of attack on Women's Rights to wake up the sleeping Giant.
The Republican Party has just become the party of MEN who do not have any further claim to protecting women's right to choose.
And this would have not even happened if it has not been for the Filibuster rule- THAT WILL BE HISTORY NOW.
And it won't be the Democrats to end the filibuster- BUT THE REPUBLICANS WILL END IT SHOULD THEY EVER WIN BACK CONGRESS!
That remains questionable now that WOMEN of all political affiliations will join together now as they are the one's who just lost their RIGHT TO CHOOSE!
70% of the Vocal Majority want to have a Women's Choice in this country.
Only 30% of Americans wanted to take away a Women's Choice by overturning Roe- Vs. Wade.
This goes to show you how out of touch the Supreme Court is now with America.
This goes to show you how politics has pissed off 70% of the Vocal Majority.
This was political over-reach by TRUMP APPOINTED JUDGES.
GOOD LUCK IN THE FALL!
Segregation was established precedent at one time.
Shall we return to that?
Wow. I never thought I'd see this. Absolutely wild.