Most likely, but read up on the Oath Keepers and you can see just how unhinged this group is. And they are in large part former military and law enforcement. They believe in no central government, and they believe they have the right to impose their view of the country onto others by force. If there's a group that might actually engage in organized violence, that's the group. And they are proud of it. I'm sure they're being watched closely. But I wouldn't underestimate what that bunch is willing to do. The sooner they wind up in jail, the better.
Rep. Abigail Spanberger (VA-D) - Never use the words 'socialist' or 'socialism'
- Thread starter Dutch Uncle
- Start date
Most likely, but read up on the Oath Keepers and you can see just how unhinged this group is. And they are in large part former military and law enforcement. They believe in no central government, and they believe they have the right to impose their view of the country onto others by force. If there's a group that might actually engage in organized violence, that's the group. And they are proud of it. I'm sure they're being watched closely. But I wouldn't underestimate what that bunch is willing to do. The sooner they wind up in jail, the better.
Your handle indicates you are lying. This isn't rocket science.
So easily triggered, little boy. lol I don't need to mandate anything -- the 2A of our Constitution clearly states "well-regulated," and YOU agreed as to the meaning of that phrase.
You are not very good at this. Hopefully, if you actually do own firearms, you're better with them than you are at making any sort of cogent point in a political discussion. Simply shooting your mouth off about how you can pick off a message board participant at 500 yards, or enslave and rape another message board poster, is meaningless, paper tiger. It earns you no respect, only well-deserved mockery.
I've read about them. You are right; they are one of the groups closely watched by our intelligence agencies. Truly bad boys though have no need to get on an obscure message board and threaten others and brag about their firepower. When you really got it, you have no need to flaunt it.
A little blurb about them for other readers:
https://www.adl.org/sites/default/f...ombating-hate/The-Oath-Keepers-ADL-Report.pdf
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I have more important things to do than keep up on all my title/avatar crap on message boards....but if it makes you feel better, i'll change it..........thanks for letting me live rent free in your head
SmarterthanYou
rebel
or you can be shocked in 4 years when it actually happens. If you're cute, maybe i'll buy you
LOL, It's a fucking message board, hammerhead. People post here. Yes, I think it's fair to note that you have pledged alliance (and continue to do so) to far right wing militias that believe the Federal Government has overreached and are prepared to take up arms. I think that's a fair point of discussion, don't you? I notice you head for the hills every time an actual discussion breaks out. Common troll.
Because it's the truth.
It's why I did. Biden's voting record is more right wing than left wing. The corporate owned Dems are a large part of the reason we had a Trump rise to power.
Why have any restrictions on rights at all? Are people restricted from carrying a gas-powered chainsaw around? A gallon of gasoline and matches?
When did rights require a need? Do you need a computer? Internet access? Buying whatever size shoes you want regardless of how they cost or how much they hurt to wear?....or, in Legion's case, Kong Dongs at a store of his choice?
no mandated training. the "well regulated militia" is a dependent clause.
SCOTUS keeps ruling the right to bear arms is an individual right not contingent on any "training"
Of course users of the bang stick should get some training,
but the Constitution doesn't require common sense to acquire that natural right
SmarterthanYou
rebel
interesting how you think that anyone who thinks the feds have overreached is automatically far right wing.........as if NOBODY else could ever think that the feds have overreached................why is that?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
there is ZERO dependancy clauses when it comes to rights.........period.
but it's not incumbent upon government to require it.........especially since the founders limited the government
since the constitution is nothing but a document that limits government, it can't possibly require anything for someone to gain a natural right
If you get close enough, maybe I'll drink from your skull. No cleaning beforehand needed.
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure that chainsaws and painful shoes have seldom been implicated in mass murders, attacks on law enforcement, or suicides. Shoes, computers, and chainsaws are not mentioned in the Constitution. I am afraid to ask what a Kong Dong is, but have a fairly good idea. lol
I have no issues with ppl owning firearms. I do not want to live in a society where everyone feels the need to walk around displaying them. That is not what America is about.
Am I an extremist?? I want a strong, free, and prosperous United States. I believe we need to completely cut off the flood of illegal immigrants into our nation.
I do NOT believe:
We should welcome terrorists with open arms.
We should allow Black Lies Matter and Antifa to intimidate us and force us to alter our behavior.
The government knows better than I do how to spend my money.
If we take money away from those who earn it and distribute it among everybody else, we'll all be happy, free, and equal.
We should reward parasites for having baby after baby after baby which the rest of us have to support.
We can end global warming by destroying people's livelihood and taking away their transportation.
Colleges and employers should give preference to certain applicants based on their skin color.
Which of those make me an extremist, Dutch Uncle??
I love you for who you are but you are wrong. You're missing the point. Anyone who thinks banning guns would stop man from killing man is fooling themselves.
Humankind is a finite species with terrific capabilities and many limitations. In a Universe of established limitations, a Universe of physical laws, then it's logical to assume a limited range of events. Odds. Like betting odds.
Please quote where I said I want to ban guns. I OWN guns. I simply want restrictions on where they can be carried in public, as noted in my reply to StupiderThanAll.
No, I think you are far right wing because of your agreement with the principles of the three percenters. You are known by the company you keep.
Sorry, but the Democrats have always said we "simply want restrictions" and, once given, wanted more restrictions.
You're as smart as anyone on this forum and you certainly know this to be true. Words matter, but honesty matters more.
Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
That, unfortunately, is pretty much what Trump does!