Religious affiliation of American scientists

[gmark77]

ftfy....^^ Perry is always trying to derail my threads into a discussion about me, and his festering grievances

Sorry Cliffe (since we're just making names up for people and you seem to be a solid thumper like Cliffe Knechtle) but it isn't a derailment to point out your atrocious version of logic.

 

[gmark77]

ftfy....^^ Perry is always trying to derail my threads into a discussion about me, and his festering grievances

Also: please stop changing my posts without the proper "FTFY"" or change my name.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

ftfy....^^ Perry is always trying to derail my threads into a discussion about me, and his festering grievances

IMO, he's retarded and desperately trying to look smart. Remember Spaz from New York?

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I love pulling my pud!

 

[Cypress]

Here's how it breaks out by scientific field.

Field​	% Who believe in God​	% Who don't believe in God, but do believe in a universal spirit of higher power​	% Who don't believe in God​	% Don't know​
Biology & Medical Sciences​	32%​	19%​	41%​	7%​
Chemistry​	41%​	14%​	39%​	7%​
Earth Sciences​	30%​	20%​	47%​	3%​
Physics & Astronomy​	29%​	14%​	46%​	11%​

 

[gmark77]

Here's how it breaks out by scientific field.

Field​	% Who believe in God​	% Who don't believe in God, but do believe in a universal spirit of higher power​	% Who don't believe in God​	% Don't know​
Biology & Medical Sciences​	32%​	19%​	41%​	7%​
Chemistry​	41%​	14%​	39%​	7%​
Earth Sciences​	30%​	20%​	47%​	3%​
Physics & Astronomy​	29%​	14%​	46%​	11%​

And that doesn't make any of those sciences amenable to the "God Hypothesis".

Even if you really love God and want to honor him in every way you can.

Science is atheistic. By definition.

 

[Cypress]

IMO, he's retarded and desperately trying to look smart. Remember Spaz from New York?

There's only one other guy in the last 20 years who followed me around and tried to derail every thread to make it about me and his grievances about me

 

[Cypress]

Science is atheistic!

ftfy...Not the profession of science, as the data on this thread unequivocally show.

There is no rule in science that you are prohibited from making philosophical inferences from the discoveries of science.

 

[gmark77]

Not the profession of science, as the data on this thread unequivocally show.

There is no rule in science that you are prohibited from making philosophical inferences from the discoveries of science.

I see you made another "illegal" post alteration. I'm afraid I'm going to have to report this.

What do you think God is going to think of you if you keep sinning?

 

[gmark77]

Not the profession of science, as the data on this thread unequivocally show.

There is no rule in science that you are prohibited from making philosophical inferences from the discoveries of science.

^^^Dumbass must think a scientist can publish a paper whose conclusion is "God done it!"

 

[Cypress]

You said SCIENCE wasn't atheistic.

You really need to work on your communication skills if you think you said anything else.

You purposefully edited out the rest of the sentence in which the context was clear I was talking about the profession of science and the people who practice it, not the scientific method.

 

[Cypress]

I see you made another "illegal" post alteration. I'm afraid I'm going to have to report this!!

ftfy

 

[gmark77]

You purposefully edited out the rest of the sentence in which the context was clear I was talking about the profession of science and the people who practice it, not the scientific method.

LOL.

No, sweetie. You said what you said. And now you realize you fucked up and you want to run away (as usual).

Usually about this time you'd whine to Dutch to come and harass me. But he's on ignore so it wont' do you any good! LOLOLOLOLOL

 

[gmark77]

ftfy

Hey, good job changing your post you dishonest fuck up.

Wow.

 

[EdwinA]

I was hired twice for adjunct college teacher positions at Sonoma State University, and a community college near Sacramento, and neither time was I ever asked what my religious beliefs were. Nor did anyone ever show the slightest interest in them.

The Oxford University mathematician John Lennox says he was told as a young man that his Christian faith could be detrimental to his research career, but that was back in the 1960s before there were civil rights laws protecting freedom of conscience.

I don't care about anecdotal wonder stories on the innernetz. or about some Jr. college out in the boonies. Quotas are against the Civil Rights Act law, too, yet they are all over the place, even in government job applications. and for decades; it has only recently come under scrutiny. It is especially rampant in science depts, like Biology.

 

[EdwinA]

If you divert my interview questions towards religious discussions like some sort of heterodox you will be pushed to the bottom of the stack, if not tossed aside completely.

At no time in the discriminatory interview process would my questions lead to such a diversion.

Crawl back up your ass and have lunch. You're a tard and I could care less what you say about anything here; you're just good for a few laughs, is all.

 

[gmark77]

I don't care about anecdotal wonder stories on the innernetz. or about some Jr. college out in the boonies.

You can be guaranteed that Cypress was hired to teach an extension course like "how to parallel park" or some such.

 

[EdwinA]

It's unprofessional to discuss politics or religion in positions that have nothing to do with either.

And you're an idiot, so there is that.

 

[EdwinA]

You can be guaranteed that Cypress was hired to teach an extension course like "how to parallel park" or some such.

I was thinking finger painting or something for those senior evening classes.

 

[EdwinA]

Can you back up what you posted?????????????

Yes. Even a biased left wing Google search will turn up all anybody needs, except you, of course; you short bus types will never be able to think on your own.

The PEanut Gallery of course already knows there have been quotas for decades, despite being illegal too under the same statutes; laws routinely get ignores by left wingers and elitist burb brats.