Prove the US is lying about who used the chemical weapons on whom

Oh the irony ..

Obama wants to conduct an illegal war to punish a supposed illegal act.

Maybe its just me.

Just being consistent... don't like the UN... don't respect the political bullshit that takes place there.

That is not a reason in my opinion to oppose Obama taking action.
 
I think we should absolutely try to prevent genocide when it occurs as it did in Rwanda, Sudan, Congo etc... if there is one group being targeted due to religious or ethnic reasons, then we should step in... especially if they lack the means to fight back.

Syria is currently in a civil war. While we don't like Assad, the other option is another Muslim brotherhood/Al Queda type leader from the opposition. We would like that even less. We should stay out of it. Especially since this has the makings for a full blown Sunni vs. Shia war with the big boys (Iran/Saudi/Turkey) behind the scenes.

Okay I agree with this.
 
certain people are just too scary to enforce chemical weapons bans on.

yeah that will work......NOT
 
who gassed brown babies in their sleep.

sometimes criminals are brown

so you want to kill more brown people to punish the brown people who killed brown people? Yeah, that makes sense. Bomb innocent people because you want to thump your chest and show the world how tough you are.
 
Once Syria's ally, Turkey turned its back on Mr Al Assad after the Syrian government fired against peaceful protesters after the country's uprising began in March 2011. Since then, Mr Erdogan has allowed the Syrian opposition to organise in Turkey and has allowed Syrian opposition fighters to use Turkish territory along the 900-kilometre border with Syria.


Read more: http://www.thenational.ae/news/worl...ia-will-bring-down-assad-regime#ixzz2dkjD6VBb
I'll be darned, didn't know this!

Stick with me kid, you might learn something.
 
I love you too sister.

When did I ever say that Rice made up the false story before the UN vote .. or, did I say this .. in an attempt to persuade nations growing increasingly skeptical about NATO-led attacks on Libya .. Rice went before a closed door meeting of the United Nations Security Council and announced that Gaddafi's forces were issuing Viagra?

This has nothing to do with the UN vote, and everything to do with the lies and deceptions of the Obama Administration .. AND, it does not go without notice that you've still said nothing about the lie, nothing about powerful women like Rice and Hillary Clinton falsely using rape as a tool of propaganda.

This has more to do with the blinders that democrats wear than anyone else.

s-rice_false-offence_en.jpg


s-rice_diagnosis-is-spring_en.jpg

Big deal, so they raped Libyan women without Viagra. Stop the presses!!
 
It was a total and complete fabrication and when it was shown that absolutely no evidence supported the claim they simply ignored the reality which only convinces the True Believer like you Desh.

What about the war in Sierra Leone, sponsored by Ghaddafi, where soldiers would bet on the sex of the foetus by removing it from the mother whilst alive?
 
Again Desh, are the people any less dead? You also ignore that conventional bombs also kill innocent children in homes and the ones next door and so on. Are they any less dead?

What about the 100k or so reported dead already prior to the use of chem weapons?

Also... for someone who demanded to see the evidence that was used to support the claims of Bush for Iraq... you sure are going easy on Obama providing the same evidence to justify lobbing missiles into Syria. Obama doesn't even have a clear objective... another thing Bush fucked up and you held him to account for... yet you give Obama a pass.

Chemical weapons are terrible but the US has never really been brought to task for deploying Agent Orange in Vietnam and white phosphorus in Fallujah. I wonder which is worse suffocating to death from Sarin or being burnt alive by white phosphorus?
 
Chemical weapons are terrible but the US has never really been brought to task for deploying Agent Orange in Vietnam and white phosphorus in Fallujah,


that was one that everyone gave me shit about for trying to prove this happened with facts.

right up until it was accepted as fact and admitted by Bush
 
Chemical weapons are terrible but the US has never really been brought to task for deploying Agent Orange in Vietnam and white phosphorus in Fallujah. I wonder which is worse suffocating to death from Sarin or being burnt alive by white phosphorus?

I don't imagine either are pleasant. Does it really matter if one is marginally worse?
 
I don't imagine either are pleasant. Does it really matter if one is marginally worse?

There is only ONE nation on earth who has ever used nuclear weapons .. and it did so twice.

Is there ANY doubt that if that nation chose to use nukes again that it would do so without regard for international law?
 
Back
Top