Pro lifers show no mercy

???....you think you can win an argument just by pointing out the unborn child is unable to speak?.....a day old child is also unable to speak....if the mother tells us he wants to die should we take her word for it and let her kill him?.......

Please post where I wrote that a fetus needed to 'speak.' I said 'consent,' built on the context you dishonestly left out...where I claimed if the 80 yr old could not speak for it's rights, then it's legal guardian or next of kin would.

Neither the 80 yr old (if incompetant) nor the fetus CAN consent and the legal guardian or next of kin makes the decisions for them...even that of removing life support. Oops!

Lost another one PMP.

Back to the loony bin I see:

of course we all know that if the child could speak it would shout "I want to die!"......

But no actual rebuttal.
 
when the mother's life is at risk......yes.....and it isn't my fault you can't comprehend the parallel with self defense, that would be your own fault.....

Her life is at risk any time during the pregnancy, so then I guess self-defense would work for someone who also considers abortion 'murder.' Hey...you choose to define things your way....so there you go.
 
Her life is at risk any time during the pregnancy

the risk of death due to maternity is negligible as the CDC data showed...perhaps for the same reason we wouldn't permit a claim of self defense to someone who killed all motorists on the basis that moving vehicles within his range posed a risk to his life.......
 
Are so callous and narcissistic that you don't think that men don't feel that someone just make a life decision for them, when an abortion takes place?

Men are the target enemy here with Lorca and the whole problem. If men are completely shut out of the pro creation process then Lorca's decision to have the baby and not abort it should relieve men of any responsibilities also in raising the baby such as when Lorca decides to use the no fault divorce option and men are still required to pay child support for many years and also be required to leave his own house. This is called too much power for women which is what Lorca supports because Lorca feels men are responsible for the baby when she says they are and not responsible when she says they're not.

It is destroying our entire society and Lorcas moral relativism on pro creation allows anyone off the street to serve her purposes such as lesbians because the man himself in the whole process is illrelavent.
 
the risk of death due to maternity is negligible as the CDC data showed...perhaps for the same reason we wouldn't permit a claim of self defense to someone who killed all motorists on the basis that moving vehicles within his range posed a risk to his life.......

The difference is that the motorist has a choice, knowing the risks, of getting on the road.

The woman also knows the risks.....and SHE makes the CHOICE....not a stranger and not the govt.

If you thought the risks too high to drive on a particular day...how would you feel if some stranger or the govt FORCED you to do so anyway?

It is not up to you to tell someone else if and how to risk their life. Perhaps you would be more comfortable in a country where they can do so but the Constitution seems to go out the window in discussions of abortion.
 
Last edited:
no, the point is, you refuse to recognize that abortion is the lesser risk........thus you think the choice to kill is rational.....

If abortion is the lesser risk, then it most certainly should remain a choice for the woman.

Kinda irrational and cruel to ask a woman to take a bigger risk to her life, health, and future for something that might never even reach term.
 
when faced with foolishness, there is nothing left to do but point and say "Look! Foolishness!"........


Really? Then try to answer it properly instead of by diversion to try and cover up the huge hole in your argument.

Prove me wrong, ruin my argument...answer the question:

"It has nothing to do with FORCING you do DO something to someone or something else. It has to do with you being FORCED to take a risk that could cost your life or health....would you allow a stranger or the govt to make that choice FOR YOU?"

.........................
 
Still just fat old white men against abortion.

The dude loves this AOD. He gets laid regularly and doesn't have to accept responsibility for doing it if pregnancy occurs. This is the kind of male that Lorca loves.
It's also the reason feminists praise males like Hugh Hefner who gives them millions of dollars toward their organizations.

Hugh Hefner and the dude are what Lorca considers real men and she celebrates both as such.
 
The dude gets laid regularly...

189654d1363885092-hva-lytter-du-til-i-dag-del-3-20120622052737-rofl.gif
 
The difference is that the motorist has a choice, knowing the risks, of getting on the road.

The woman also knows the risks.....and SHE makes the CHOICE....not a stranger and not the govt.

did the child make the choice to get on the road?......she's the one getting killed.....
 
Back
Top