Palin's Speech

As for your second comment how about just state what you think? Is your argument the energy coming from Alaska is controlled by the federal government and not the state of Alaska and therefore the Govenor of Alaska plays no role in it and therefore it is a lie to say Palin has any role?



I said what I meant. Alaska is not in charge of that energy which is what they claimed.

Seriously go back to remedial reading comprehension.

You need it.

Like in a seriously bad way.











I'm not even kidding.
 
Convention faces are generally scary, no matter which party it is, but last night took the cake. That's a weird, bug-eyed crew they've got over there this week....

Yeah I made the mistake of turning to PBS during Rudy's rant....I was just amazed....
 
I feel kind of bad, because Cawacko has really been abused, for years now, on this whole reading thing. He was advised on more than one occasion to initiate a class-action lawsuit against the university that graduated him, but I don’t think he ever followed-through. So let’s show him a little sympathy, he’s not a bad guy, just a bad reader, and heck, this is America – where a bad reader can grow up and become President of the United States. So you take heart in that Cawacko, and don’t let em get you down! I still love you!

Reading sucks.
 
Palin is proving to be the best choice McCain could have possibly made.

She's energized his base and his campaign.

His fundraising coffers have exploded since he picked her.

... and democrats continue to focus on all the wrong shit.

There is a reason why democrats are not very good at national elections.
 
Palin is proving to be the best choice McCain could have possibly made.

She's energized his base and his campaign.

His fundraising coffers have exploded since he picked her.

... and democrats continue to focus on all the wrong shit.

There is a reason why democrats are not very good at national elections.

democrats or the media ? And is it intentional ?
 
Palin is proving to be the best choice McCain could have possibly made.

She's energized his base and his campaign.

His fundraising coffers have exploded since he picked her.

... and democrats continue to focus on all the wrong shit.

There is a reason why democrats are not very good at national elections.

Yep, they keep shooting themselves in the feet with the strategy of acting completely outraged. While the Republicans just act like they don't care and are laughing at liberals.
 
Yep, they keep shooting themselves in the feet with the strategy of acting completely outraged. While the Republicans just act like they don't care and are laughing at liberals.

Who’s acting outraged? With OBama/Biden both focusing on the economy, which democrats are focusing on the wrong things? Should they give speeches railing against east coast elites instead?
I don’t get this. I feel like I’m on pills.
 
Who’s acting outraged? With OBama/Biden both focusing on the economy, which democrats are focusing on the wrong things? Should they give speeches railing against east coast elites instead?
I don’t get this. I feel like I’m on pills.

The normal human being has no freakin clue what Obama and Biden are talking about today, or where they are at. The normal human being has interactions with political fruitcakes at least once within a week timeframe. The Democrats are always the loudest, while Conservatives just kinda keep to themselves (unless they are pushing religion, and we see people becoming less and less religious too)
 
Yep, they keep shooting themselves in the feet with the strategy of acting completely outraged. While the Republicans just act like they don't care and are laughing at liberals.

The Democrtaic Party is not "liberals"

It is the center .. which is why they can't win.
 
The normal human being has no freakin clue what Obama and Biden are talking about today, or where they are at. The normal human being has interactions with political fruitcakes at least once within a week timeframe. The Democrats are always the loudest, while Conservatives just kinda keep to themselves (unless they are pushing religion, and we see people becoming less and less religious too)

Ok I still have no idea what this means.
 
I would counter look at Bill Clinton. He ran as a 'new Democrat' and was the first Dem since FDR (?) to serve two full terms.

Hard to imagine he wins in 92 without Perot. 96, yes.

I do believe there is a big opportunity for dems to run more as economic leftist, or, populists.

But the left position on national security is a loser in the general.
 
We need to run someone who wants to legalize gay marriage and institute universal healthcare and also wants to nuke the middle east.

Then we'll just convince him not to afterwards. Fuck the people.
 
I would counter look at Bill Clinton. He ran as a 'new Democrat' and was the first Dem since FDR (?) to serve two full terms.

To take a page from the Gore excusers .. if not for Perot, there would be no Clinton era to talk about.

Clinton couldn't even hold onto Congress even with economic expansion and his DLC cohorts led the party into a plethora of embarrassing election failures.

Even with that economic expansion somehow Gore still managed to lose.

Enter .. the era of almost complete republican control of government.

The surprising victories in 2006 was led by the anti-DLC, democratic wing of the Democratic Party .. which also swept Obama into the nomination .. OVER the DLC candidate Hillary Clinton.

NOW Obama returns to the same tired failed politics of the DLC and Obamaites are wondering what happened.

This is supposed to be the Year of the Democrats .. the easiest election in history. They had everything going for them.
 
To take a page from the Gore excusers .. if not for Perot, there would be no Clinton era to talk about.

Clinton couldn't even hold onto Congress even with economic expansion and his DLC cohorts led the party into a plethora of embarrassing election failures.

Even with that economic expansion somehow Gore still managed to lose.

Enter .. the era of almost complete republican control of government.

The surprising victories in 2006 was led by the anti-DLC, democratic wing of the Democratic Party .. which also swept Obama into the nomination .. OVER the DLC candidate Hillary Clinton.

NOW Obama returns to the same tired failed politics of the DLC and Obamaites are wondering what happened.

This is supposed to be the Year of the Democrats .. the easiest election in history. They had everything going for them.

I agree with much of this, except that, I am not wondering what happened, and I never thought this was going to be the easiest election in history. I never understood why you thought it would be a landslide. My opinion – this country really is that divided. And Obama is winning, and I believe will win. But, that’s just my take on it.
 
Back
Top