Palin Lied!
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
Way too logical. By saying "yes" to a very clear question, somehow, we have no idea what she was really trying to say...
I have to be honest and say that I have found evidence that she has given very contradictory statements on this, and it appears to depend on whom she was talking to.
She definitely told the Eagle forum what they wanted to hear though. And that was, that "YES" I support abstinence till marriage education. SF can twist and dance all he wants - you know what they say, the last two drops still will end up in his pants.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/120742.php
"Palin in a July 2006 survey was asked if she supported abstinence-only sex education programs instead of "explicit sex education programs, school-based clinics and distribution of contraceptives in schools." Palin wrote, "Yes the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support." In a radio interview in August 2006, Palin was asked whether programs that discuss condoms are included in "explicit" programs. Palin said no and called discussions of condoms "relatively benign." She added, "I'm pro-contraception and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues. So I am not anti-contraception. But, yeah, abstinence is another alternative that should be discussed with kids. I don't have a problem with that. That doesn't scare me, so it's something I would support also.""
"Palin in a July 2006 survey was asked if she supported abstinence-only sex education programs instead of "explicit sex education programs, school-based clinics and distribution of contraceptives in schools." Palin wrote, "Yes the explicit sex-ed programs will not find my support." In a radio interview in August 2006, Palin was asked whether programs that discuss condoms are included in "explicit" programs. Palin said no and called discussions of condoms "relatively benign." She added, "I'm pro-contraception and I think kids who may not hear about it at home should hear about it in other avenues. So I am not anti-contraception. But, yeah, abstinence is another alternative that should be discussed with kids. I don't have a problem with that. That doesn't scare me, so it's something I would support also.""
It's scary because I worry about SF on dates. I feel that, due to his daily displaying of an inability to understand yes and no, he should be getting any woman he has relations with to sign a "I consent" form.
His language skills are extrememly problematic.
Again.
Therefore it matters what program she actually participated in.
Just because her mother believed in one thing does not mean that it happened. Even if her mother believed in the "Watch the farm animals only" education on sex it wouldn't change that at school she went through an entirely different program that may or may not have been inclusive of birth control.
Which was it? I would like to know what program "failed" her rather than assume it because her mother thought something alien to my logic sensors.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
except that Jarod seemed to figure it out, yet you did not. Saying Yes, to abstinence until marriage is not the same as saying yes to abstinence only.
I provided you another direct quote from Palin since that is what you wanted.
Please, enjoy trying to spin your way out of that quote.
I found that 20 minutes ago. You are a slow googler aren't you?
Why do you believe she told the Eagle forum, a right wing religious organization who supports abstinence only one thing, and this interviewer another thing?
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
LMAO... you are the ones that are trying to read into that quote rather than trying to find what her actual position is.
Enjoy the longer quote from Palin. It will show you just how wrong you are.
Socrtease
Verified User
Palin was asked the question during an Eagle Forum. Do the research and find out what Eagle Forum means by Abstinence Until Marriage and that give you the context of the answer. Eagle Forum believes that teaching about contraceptives sends a contradictory message and believes in Abstinence ONLY so the context of the question in an Eagle Forum was exactly that.
It shows that she took two different positions dependent on who was asking - and it shows that there other than the fact that she is a religious right winger, we can't know what her actual position is because of those very conflicting statements.
Yes. Perhaps she got some blowback from that, because she later started tap dancing much like SF and Damo have been on this very thread.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
She didn't tell them different things. She stated in your article that she supports abstinence until marriage and opposes explicit sex education. The article I posted asked her to clarify what she included in "explicit sex education"... she then clarified it. She did so because certain partisan hacks tried to read into her statements and pretend that by opposing the explicity sex education portion that meant she opposed everything but abstinence. Or that by saying she supported abstinence until marriage being taught that THAT somehow meant she opposed everything else.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
It does not matter what Eagle forum believes. It matters what PALIN beleives it to mean. Clearly she does not think teaching kids about contraception is a part of it.
Considering her other social positions, it seems more likely that she didn't lie to them, she lied to the other interviewer.
But with a liar, who can really know for certain.
The only person that is clear to is you SF. But you always were a Palin high heel licker.
